19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The prevention of COVID-19 in high-risk patients using tixagevimab–cilgavimab (Evusheld): Real-world experience at a large academic center

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality among immunocompromised patients. Tixagevimab–Cilgavimab (Tix-Cil) is a combination of two monoclonal antibodies approved for the prevention of COVID-19 complications in this high-risk group.

          Methods

          We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who received Tix-Cil during the Omicron variant period (January 17 to April 23, 2022), with a follow-up period until May 24, 2022. We collected data regarding patient underlying comorbidities and post Tix-Cil COVID-19 infections, deaths, and hospitalizations.

          Results

          There were 463 patients with a median age of 68, of which 51% were male, 79% White, 13.2% Hispanic, 1.7% Black/African American, and 5.8% who identified as Other. A total of 18% had undergone a solid organ transplantation (SOT) or Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT). Only 6/98 (6.1%) had a SARS-CoV-2 detected by PCR at a median 48 days (IQR 27.5, 69) follow-up. Forty-two patients (9.1%) were hospitalized, and four (0.9%) died, but none were attributed to COVID-19 or Tix-Cil. One hospitalized patient had an incidental, asymptomatic, positive SARS-CoV 2 by PCR. The median days from Tix-Cil administration to non-COVID-19 related hospitalization and death were 30 (IQR 17, 55) and 53 (IQR 18, 91), respectively.

          Conclusion

          Tix-Cil provides protection against COVID-19 complications in immunocompromised patients with suboptimal immune responses to vaccines.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Broadly neutralizing antibodies overcome SARS-CoV-2 Omicron antigenic shift

          The recently emerged SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant encodes 37 amino acid substitutions in the spike protein, 15 of which are in the receptor-binding domain (RBD), thereby raising concerns about the effectiveness of available vaccines and antibody-based therapeutics. Here we show that the Omicron RBD binds to human ACE2 with enhanced affinity, relative to the Wuhan-Hu-1 RBD, and binds to mouse ACE2. Marked reductions in neutralizing activity were observed against Omicron compared to the ancestral pseudovirus in plasma from convalescent individuals and from individuals who had been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, but this loss was less pronounced after a third dose of vaccine. Most monoclonal antibodies that are directed against the receptor-binding motif lost in vitro neutralizing activity against Omicron, with only 3 out of 29 monoclonal antibodies retaining unaltered potency, including the ACE2-mimicking S2K146 antibody1. Furthermore, a fraction of broadly neutralizing sarbecovirus monoclonal antibodies neutralized Omicron through recognition of antigenic sites outside the receptor-binding motif, including sotrovimab2, S2X2593 and S2H974. The magnitude of Omicron-mediated immune evasion marks a major antigenic shift in SARS-CoV-2. Broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies that recognize RBD epitopes that are conserved among SARS-CoV-2 variants and other sarbecoviruses may prove key to controlling the ongoing pandemic and future zoonotic spillovers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Antibody evasion properties of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sublineages

            The identification of the Omicron (B.1.1.529.1 or BA.1) variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Botswana in November 2021 1 immediately caused concern owing to the number of alterations in the spike glycoprotein that could lead to antibody evasion. We 2 and others 3 – 6 recently reported results confirming such a concern. Continuing surveillance of the evolution of Omicron has since revealed the rise in prevalence of two sublineages, BA.1 with an R346K alteration (BA.1+R346K, also known as BA.1.1) and B.1.1.529.2 (BA.2), with the latter containing 8 unique spike alterations and lacking 13 spike alterations found in BA.1. Here we extended our studies to include antigenic characterization of these new sublineages. Polyclonal sera from patients infected by wild-type SARS-CoV-2 or recipients of current mRNA vaccines showed a substantial loss in neutralizing activity against both BA.1+R346K and BA.2, with drops comparable to that already reported for BA.1 (refs. 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 ). These findings indicate that these three sublineages of Omicron are antigenically equidistant from the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and thus similarly threaten the efficacies of current vaccines. BA.2 also exhibited marked resistance to 17 of 19 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies tested, including S309 (sotrovimab) 7 , which had retained appreciable activity against BA.1 and BA.1+R346K (refs. 2 – 4 , 6 ). This finding shows that no authorized monoclonal antibody therapy could adequately cover all sublineages of the Omicron variant, except for the recently authorized LY-CoV1404 (bebtelovimab). A study reports on the antigenic characterization of SARS-CoV-2 BA.1, BA.1.1 and BA.2 and the neutralizing activity of different monoclonal antibodies and sera against them.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Intramuscular AZD7442 (Tixagevimab–Cilgavimab) for Prevention of Covid-19

              Abstract Background The monoclonal-antibody combination AZD7442 is composed of tixagevimab and cilgavimab, two neutralizing antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that have an extended half-life and have been shown to have prophylactic and therapeutic effects in animal models. Pharmacokinetic data in humans indicate that AZD7442 has an extended half-life of approximately 90 days. Methods In an ongoing phase 3 trial, we enrolled adults (≥18 years of age) who had an increased risk of an inadequate response to vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), an increased risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2, or both. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive a single dose (two consecutive intramuscular injections, one containing tixagevimab and the other containing cilgavimab) of either 300 mg of AZD7442 or saline placebo, and they were followed for up to 183 days in the primary analysis. The primary safety end point was the incidence of adverse events after a single dose of AZD7442. The primary efficacy end point was symptomatic Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by means of reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction assay) occurring after administration of AZD7442 or placebo and on or before day 183. Results A total of 5197 participants underwent randomization and received one dose of AZD7442 or placebo (3460 in the AZD7442 group and 1737 in the placebo group). The primary analysis was conducted after 30% of the participants had become aware of their randomized assignment. In total, 1221 of 3461 participants (35.3%) in the AZD7442 group and 593 of 1736 participants (34.2%) in the placebo group reported having at least one adverse event, most of which were mild or moderate in severity. Symptomatic Covid-19 occurred in 8 of 3441 participants (0.2%) in the AZD7442 group and in 17 of 1731 participants (1.0%) in the placebo group (relative risk reduction, 76.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 46.0 to 90.0; P<0.001); extended follow-up at a median of 6 months showed a relative risk reduction of 82.8% (95% CI, 65.8 to 91.4). Five cases of severe or critical Covid-19 and two Covid-19–related deaths occurred, all in the placebo group. Conclusions A single dose of AZD7442 had efficacy for the prevention of Covid-19, without evident safety concerns. (Funded by AstraZeneca and the U.S. government; PROVENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04625725.)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Am J Med
                Am J Med
                The American Journal of Medicine
                Elsevier Inc.
                0002-9343
                1555-7162
                29 September 2022
                29 September 2022
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Infectious Disease, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A.
                [2 ]Division of Nephrology, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A.
                [3 ]Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A.
                [4 ]Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A.
                [5 ]Division of Nephrology, The University of Arizona, COM, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A.
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding Author: Tirdad T. Zangeneh, DO, MA, FACP, FIDSA, FAST, Professor of Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Ave., Tucson, AZ.
                Article
                S0002-9343(22)00637-4
                10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.08.019
                9519524
                36181789
                5aed0336-746c-4f6c-9d36-def82d5d5af7
                © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Clinical Research Study

                tixagevimab–cilgavimab,covid-19,immunocompromised host

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content108

                Cited by13

                Most referenced authors354