14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Struggle for Certainty: Ontological Security, the Rise of Nationalism, and Australia-China Tensions after COVID-19

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Australia-China relations have been relatively stable over the last decade. However, soon after the outbreak of COVID-19, Australia took an increasingly assertive stance toward China, one that is arguably even more assertive than those of its Western allies. What prompted Australia to adopt a tougher policy against China? This article argues that COVID-19 has brought significant uncertainty to the international system and, hence, to Australia’s external environment, which has affected the country’s decision-making, accelerating the formation of a hardline policy toward China. A contributing factor behind this policy is Australia’s quest for ontological security, which, in the context of COVID-19, has triggered a rise in anti-China sentiment. Meanwhile, this strategy backfired when it encountered China’s own nationalism, which exacerbated the widening political chasm, dragging the two countries into an unprecedented diplomatic confrontation. The core of ontological security lies in maintaining the stability of the identity needed for the formation of consistent policy. The uncertainties created by the COVID-19 pandemic have changed the familiar external environment and challenged Australia’s ability to interpret this new environment and adjust to it, which has triggered ontological insecurity. By analyzing Australia’s identity as a middle power in the context of changing regional security and its commitment to certain values, the article shows how COVID-19 has accelerated Australia’s quest for ontological security, which has changed the country’s China policy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The state as person in international theory

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Anxiety, fear, and ontological security in world politics: thinking with and beyond Giddens

              Research on ontological security in world politics has mushroomed since the early 2000s but seems to have reached an impasse. Ontological security is a conceptual lens for understanding subjectivity that focuses on the management of anxiety in self-constitution. Building especially on Giddens, IR scholars have emphasized how this translates to a need for cognitive consistency and biographical continuity – a security of ‘being.’ A criticism has been its so-called ‘status quo bias,’ a perceived tilt toward theorizing investment in the existing social order. To some, an ontological security lens both offers social theoretic foundations for a realist worldview and lacks resources to conceptualize alternatives. We disagree. Through this symposium, we address that critique and suggest pathways forward by focusing on the thematic of anxiety. Distinguishing between anxiety and fear, we note that anxiety manifests in different emotions and leaves room for a range of political possibilities. Early ontological security scholarship relied heavily on readings of Giddens, which potentially accounts for its bias. This symposium re-opens the question of the relationship between anxiety and subjectivity from the perspective of ontological security, thinking with and beyond Giddens. Three contributions re-think anxiety in ontological security drawing on existentialist philosophy; two address limitations of Giddens' approach.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Guangyi.pan@unsw.edu.au
                a.korolev@unsw.edu.au
                Journal
                J Chin Polit Sci
                J Chin Polit Sci
                Journal of Chinese Political Science
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                1080-6954
                1874-6357
                5 January 2021
                : 1-24
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Newcastle, Australia
                [2 ]GRID grid.1005.4, ISNI 0000 0004 4902 0432, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, , University of New South Wales, ; Sydney, Australia
                [3 ]GRID grid.1005.4, ISNI 0000 0004 4902 0432, UNSW, ; Morven Brown Building, Kensington, NSW 2052 Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8398-242X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2794-8187
                Article
                9710
                10.1007/s11366-020-09710-7
                7783695
                5ac41b80-36b5-4839-b81c-27f113b57a7b
                © Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 2021

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 23 November 2020
                Categories
                Research Article

                australia-china relations,ontological security,nationalism

                Comments

                Comment on this article