8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tumor-Specific D-Dimer Concentration Ranges and Influencing Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          D-dimer level in cancer patients is associated with risk of venous thromboembolism and deep venous thrombosis. Most cancer patients have “abnormal” D-dimer levels based on the current normal reference range. To investigate tumor-specific D-dimer reference range, we compared D-dimer levels for nine different tumour types with healthy controls by using simultaneous quantile regression and constructing a median, 5th percentile, and 95th percentile model of normal tumour D-dimer concentration. Associations with tumour primary site, stage, pathological type, and treatment were also explored. Additionally, 190 patients were tracked to reveal the relevance of initial D-dimer levels to cancer prognosis. D-dimer ranges (median, 5th, 95th) in various cancers (mg/L) were: liver 1.12, 0.27, 5.25; pancreatic 0.96, 0.23, 4.81; breast 0.44, 0.2, 2.17; gastric 0.65, 0.22, 5.03; colorectal 0.73, 0.22, 4.45; lung 0.7, 0.25, 4.0; gynaecological 0.61, 0.22, 3.98; oesophageal 0.23, 0.7, 3.45; and head and neck 0.22, 0.44, 2.19. All were significantly higher than that of healthy controls (0.18, 0.07, 0.57). D-dimer peaked 1–2 days postoperatively but had decreased to the normal range by 1 week. Additionally, cancer patients with high initial D-dimer were shown a tendency of poor prognosis in survival rate. In conclusion, D-dimer levels in cancer depend on patient age, tumour primary site, and tumour stage. Thrombosis prevention is necessary if D-dimer has not decreased to the tumor-specific baseline a week after surgery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          High D-dimer levels are associated with poor prognosis in cancer patients.

          Systemic activation of hemostasis is frequently observed in cancer patients, even in the absence of thrombosis. Moreover, this activation has been implicated in tumor progression, angiogenesis and metastatic spread. Increased levels of D-dimer, which is a degradation product of cross-linked fibrin, indicate a global activation of hemostasis and fibrinolysis. In a prospective and observational cohort study, we assessed the prognostic value of D-dimer levels for overall survival and mortality risk in 1178 cancer patients included in the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS). Patients were followed over 2 years at regular intervals until occurrence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism or death. D-dimer levels were measured with a quantitative D-dimer latex agglutination assay The main solid tumors were malignancies of the lung (n=182), breast (n=157), lower gastrointestinal tract (n=133), pancreas (n=74), stomach (n=50), kidney (n=37), prostate (n=133), and brain (n=148); 201 of the patients had hematologic malignancies; 63 had other tumors. During a median follow-up of 731 days, 460 (39.0%) patients died. The overall survival probabilities for patients with D-dimer levels categorized into four groups based on the 1(st), 2(nd) and 3(rd) quartiles of the D-dimer distribution in the total study population were 88%, 82%, 66% and 53% after 1 year, and 78%, 66%, 50% and 30% after 2 years, respectively (P<0.001). The univariate hazard ratio of D-dimer (per double increase) for mortality was 1.5 (95% confidence interval: 1.4-1.6, P<0.001) and remained increased in multivariable analysis including tumor subgroups, age, sex and venous thromboembolism. High D-dimer levels were associated with poor overall survival and increased mortality risk in cancer patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A comparison of three months of anticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism.

            Patients who have a first episode of venous thromboembolism in the absence of known risk factors for thrombosis (idiopathic thrombosis) are often treated with anticoagulant therapy for three months. Such patients may benefit from longer treatment, however, because they appear to have an increased risk of recurrence after anticoagulant therapy is stopped. In this double-blind study, we randomly assigned patients who had completed 3 months of anticoagulant therapy for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism to continue receiving warfarin, with the dose adjusted to achieve an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0, or to receive placebo for a further 24 months. Our goal was to determine the effects of extended anticoagulant therapy on rates of recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism and bleeding. A prespecified interim analysis of efficacy led to the early termination of the trial after 162 patients had been enrolled and followed for an average of 10 months. Of 83 patients assigned to continue to receive placebo, 17 had a recurrent episode of venous thromboembolism (27.4 percent per patient-year), as compared with 1 of 79 patients assigned to receive warfarin (1.3 percent per patient-year, P<0.001). Warfarin resulted in a 95 percent reduction in the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (95 percent confidence interval, 63 to 99 percent). Three patients assigned to the warfarin group had nonfatal major bleeding (two had gastrointestinal bleeding and one genitourinary bleeding), as compared with none of those assigned to the placebo group (3.8 vs. 0 percent per patient-year, P=0.09). Patients with a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism should be treated with anticoagulant agents for longer than three months.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A comparison of six weeks with six months of oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of venous thromboembolism. Duration of Anticoagulation Trial Study Group.

              The optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of venous thromboembolism is still a matter of debate. We performed a multicenter trial comparing six weeks of oral anticoagulant treatment with six months of such therapy in patients who had a first episode of venous thromboembolism. Anticoagulant therapy consisted of warfarin or dicumarol. Of the 902 patients enrolled, 5 were later excluded because they had congenital protein C deficiency; 443 were randomly assigned to receive six weeks of oral anticoagulant therapy with a targeted international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0 to 2.85, and 454 were randomly assigned to receive six months of such therapy. The initial diagnoses were confirmed by means of venography in cases of deep-vein thromboses (n = 790) and with perfusion-ventilation scanning or angiography in cases of pulmonary embolism (n = 107); recurrences were confirmed in the same way. After two years of follow-up, there had been 123 recurrences of venous thromboembolism that met the diagnostic criteria, 80 in the six-week group (18.1 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 14.5 to 21.6) and 43 in the six-month group (9.5 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 6.8 to 12.2). The odds ratio for recurrence in the six-week group was 2.1 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.4 to 3.1). There was no difference in mortality or the rate of major hemorrhage between the six-week and six-month groups. Six months of prophylactic oral anticoagulation after a first episode of venous thromboembolism led to a lower recurrence rate than did treatment lasting for six weeks. The difference between the two groups occurred between 6 weeks and 6 months after the start of treatment, and the rates of recurrence remained nearly parallel for 1 1/2 years thereafter.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                11 November 2016
                2016
                : 11
                : 11
                : e0165390
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The State Key Laboratory of Virology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
                [2 ]Department of Laboratory, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, China
                [3 ]Department of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University; Wuhan, China
                [4 ]Stago Diagnosis Company, Wuhan, China
                [5 ]Department of Orthopaedics, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
                [6 ]Laboratory of Immunology, University of Lorraine, Lorraine, France
                University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: We have the following interests: Anming Yu is employed by Stago Diagnosis Company. Stago Diagnosis Company supplied partial D-dimer testing reagents and some technic supports. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter our adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

                • Conceived and designed the experiments: D. Li JY YW.

                • Performed the experiments: JY D. Lei FY FP HZ KW HC.

                • Analyzed the data: JY XT.

                • Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AY XW LC.

                • Wrote the paper: JY D. Li.

                Article
                PONE-D-16-07690
                10.1371/journal.pone.0165390
                5105993
                27835633
                5a7851c9-76e0-40b2-b472-5d556a6014a0
                © 2016 Yu et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 22 February 2016
                : 20 September 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 5, Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809, National Natural Science Foundation of China;
                Award ID: 30901356
                Award Recipient : Dongqing Dong Li
                Funded by: Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
                Award ID: 3082008
                Award Recipient : Dongqing Dong Li
                Funded by: Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China
                Award ID: 20090141120014
                Award Recipient : Dongqing Dong Li
                Funded by: Research Foundation of Health Department of Hubei Province
                Award ID: JX4B67
                Award Recipient : Dongqing Dong Li
                This work was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30901356), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.3082008), Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (No.20090141120014), and Research Foundation of Health Department of Hubei Province (No. JX4B67). The study sponsors had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Anming Yu is employed by Stago Diagnosis Company. Stago Diagnosis Company provided support by the supply of partial D-dimer testing reagents and some technic support and paid the salary for author AY, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Anming Yu is the one who supported technical support. This specific role of this author is articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Malignant Tumors
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Benign Tumors
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Carcinomas
                Hepatocellular Carcinoma
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Gastrointestinal Tumors
                Hepatocellular Carcinoma
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Gastroenterology and Hepatology
                Liver Diseases
                Hepatocellular Carcinoma
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Head and Neck Tumors
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Lung and Intrathoracic Tumors
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancer Treatment
                Surgical Oncology
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Clinical Medicine
                Clinical Oncology
                Surgical Oncology
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Clinical Oncology
                Surgical Oncology
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Breast Tumors
                Breast Cancer
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures
                Custom metadata
                Relevant data are within the paper and its Information files. Identifying information has been removed to protect participant identities. Please contact the Corresponding Author with additional questions.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article