11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Review and Commentary of a National Academies Report

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • This article provides a comprehensive review of the recent NASEM consensus committee report on Social Isolation and Loneliness. The relevance specifically for mental health providers is emphasized.

          • What is the primary question addressed by this study?

            What are the physical and mental health consequences of social isolation and loneliness?

            What are the current evidence based interventions for social isolation and loneliness which can be implemented by mental health professionals?

          • What is the main finding of this study?

            Social isolation and loneliness are significant public health problems and are clear risks for death, depression, anxiety, and cognitive disorders such as major cognitive impairment (dementia).

            The evidence based interventions by mental health professionals for social isolation and loneliness are limited yet some have emerged which are promising.

          • What is the meaning of the finding?

            Health and mental health care professionals may be the first to identify socially isolated and lonely older adults as these older adults are at significant increased risk for serious adverse outcomes. For this reason, these professionals should know how to screen for and to initiate interventions that can be helpful.

          Abstract

          The authors of this review both served on the National Academy of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Committee that produced the report, “Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System”. In 2018, the AARP Foundation commissioned the National Academies to establish a committee to research and develop a report on social isolation and loneliness in persons 50 years of age and older. Emphasis was placed upon the role of the health care system in addressing this fundamental public health problem. The committee released the report in February 2020 as the COVID-19 pandemic was beginning to spread to North America. In this review, the authors share central findings and conclusions from the report as well as how these findings may be relevant to the care and well-being of older adults during this historic pandemic. The health protective benefits of social distancing must be balanced by the essential need for sustaining social relationships.

          Related collections

          Most cited references86

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review.

          Actual and perceived social isolation are both associated with increased risk for early mortality. In this meta-analytic review, our objective is to establish the overall and relative magnitude of social isolation and loneliness and to examine possible moderators. We conducted a literature search of studies (January 1980 to February 2014) using MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Social Work Abstracts, and Google Scholar. The included studies provided quantitative data on mortality as affected by loneliness, social isolation, or living alone. Across studies in which several possible confounds were statistically controlled for, the weighted average effect sizes were as follows: social isolation odds ratio (OR) = 1.29, loneliness OR = 1.26, and living alone OR = 1.32, corresponding to an average of 29%, 26%, and 32% increased likelihood of mortality, respectively. We found no differences between measures of objective and subjective social isolation. Results remain consistent across gender, length of follow-up, and world region, but initial health status has an influence on the findings. Results also differ across participant age, with social deficits being more predictive of death in samples with an average age younger than 65 years. Overall, the influence of both objective and subjective social isolation on risk for mortality is comparable with well-established risk factors for mortality.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies.

            Most studies of social relationships in later life focus on the amount of social contact, not on individuals' perceptions of social isolation. However, loneliness is likely to be an important aspect of aging. A major limiting factor in studying loneliness has been the lack of a measure suitable for large-scale social surveys. This article describes a short loneliness scale developed specifically for use on a telephone survey. The scale has three items and a simplified set of response categories but appears to measure overall loneliness quite well. The authors also document the relationship between loneliness and several commonly used measures of objective social isolation. As expected, they find that objective and subjective isolation are related. However, the relationship is relatively modest, indicating that the quantitative and qualitative aspects of social relationships are distinct. This result suggests the importance of studying both dimensions of social relationships in the aging process.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure.

              D. Russell (1996)
              In this article I evaluated the psychometric properties of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3). Using data from prior studies of college students, nurses, teachers, and the elderly, analyses of the reliability, validity, and factor structure of this new version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale were conducted. Results indicated that the measure was highly reliable, both in terms of internal consistency (coefficient alpha ranging from .89 to .94) and test-retest reliability over a 1-year period (r = .73). Convergent validity for the scale was indicated by significant correlations with other measures of loneliness. Construct validity was supported by significant relations with measures of the adequacy of the individual's interpersonal relationships, and by correlations between loneliness and measures of health and well-being. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that a model incorporating a global bipolar loneliness factor along with two method factor reflecting direction of item wording provided a very good fit to the data across samples. Implications of these results for future measurement research on loneliness are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Am J Geriatr Psychiatry
                Am J Geriatr Psychiatry
                The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
                Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.
                1064-7481
                1545-7214
                19 August 2020
                19 August 2020
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
                [2 ]Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center
                Author notes
                [* ] Correspondence and Reprint Requests to: Dan Blazer MD, PhD, Duke University Medical Center, 203 Midenhall Way Cary, North Carolina 27513, Tel: 919-684-4128; FAX: 919-684-8569 dan.g.blazer@ 123456duke.edu
                Article
                S1064-7481(20)30442-5
                10.1016/j.jagp.2020.08.005
                7437541
                32919873
                5a2848d4-ff2b-4b9a-bbf2-415f4616857e
                © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 3 August 2020
                : 13 August 2020
                Categories
                Article

                social isolation,loneliness,social connection,social support,social integration,health care policy

                Comments

                Comment on this article