3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A systematic review of the role of clozapine for severe borderline personality disorder

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rationale

          Clozapine is a unique medication with a potential role in the treatment of severe borderline personality disorder (BPD).

          Objectives

          The review examines the effectiveness of clozapine as a medication for management for severe BPD with high risk of suicide, violence or imprisonment, and aims to help guide clinical practice in managing severe BPD.

          Methods

          A database search of the terms “Clozapine” AND “BPD”; “Antipsychotics” AND “BPD”; “Clozapine” AND “Borderline Personality Disorder”; and “Antipsychotics” AND “Borderline Personality Disorder” were performed in CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science. Full-text articles of clinical clozapine use for BPD were included for review.

          Results

          A total of 24 articles consisting of 1 randomised control trial, 10 non-controlled trials, and 13 case reports were identified. Most of the studies reported benefits from clozapine when used for severe BPD. Many of the studies focused on clozapine use in BPD patients at high risk of suicide. Results from these non-controlled and case reports support the use of clozapine in patients with severe BPD at high risk of suicide.

          Conclusion

          There may be a role for clozapine in treating severe treatment refractory BPD, especially for those patients at high risk of suicide and frequent hospitalisations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

            Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

              Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions”), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units (individuals or clusters of individuals) to comparison groups. The tool will be particularly useful to those undertaking systematic reviews that include non-randomised studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Joshua.Han@sa.gov.au
                Journal
                Psychopharmacology (Berl)
                Psychopharmacology (Berl)
                Psychopharmacology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0033-3158
                1432-2072
                12 August 2023
                12 August 2023
                2023
                : 240
                : 10
                : 2015-2031
                Affiliations
                [1 ]College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, ( https://ror.org/01kpzv902) Adelaide, South Australia Australia
                [2 ]Discipline of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, ( https://ror.org/01kpzv902) Adelaide, South Australia Australia
                [3 ]Consortrium of Australian-Academic Psychiatrists for Independent Policy and Research Analysis (CAPIPRA), ( https://ror.org/03fy7b149) ACT Canberra, Australia
                [4 ]GRID grid.413314.0, ISNI 0000 0000 9984 5644, Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, , The Australian National University School of Medicine and Psychology, Canberra Hospital, ; Canberra, ACT Australia
                [5 ]Department of Psychiatry, the School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, ( https://ror.org/02zhqgq86) Hong Kong, Hong Kong
                [6 ]The State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, ( https://ror.org/02zhqgq86) Hong Kong, Hong Kong
                [7 ]Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, ( https://ror.org/02bfwt286) Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6366-0661
                Article
                6431
                10.1007/s00213-023-06431-6
                10506937
                37572113
                593fae55-d3e2-4d47-9498-e3038ab5c41c
                © Crown 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 13 January 2023
                : 21 July 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Flinders University
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                clozapine,severe borderline personality disorder,· suicide,recurrent self-harm

                Comments

                Comment on this article