5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact and effectiveness of meningococcal vaccines: a review Translated title: Examen del impacto y la efectividad de las vacunas antimeningocócicas Translated title: Impacto e efetividade das vacinas meningocócicas: uma revisão sistemática

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Objectives.

          To summarize and critically evaluate the evidence on the impact and effectiveness of meningococcal vaccination programs around the world in order to inform decisionmaking in Latin America and the Caribbean .

          Methods.

          A review of the literature was conducted following several components of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed Central® was searched for papers published in any language from January 1999 – March 2017 .

          Results.

          In all, 32 studies were included, most of which evaluated the meningococcal C conjugate vaccine. Fourteen studies measured effectiveness and 30 measured impact. The effectiveness of polysaccharide vaccines was 65% – 83.7% (different age groups), while the effectiveness of the conjugate vaccines was 66% – 100%. Incidence decline of laboratory-confirmed meningococcal disease for the conjugate vaccine ranged from 77% – 100% among different ages groups. The only study that evaluated the protein subunit vaccine reported a vaccine effectiveness of 82.9% .

          Conclusions.

          The studies reviewed show impact and effectiveness of both polysaccharide vaccines and conjugate vaccines on vaccine-serogroup meningococcal disease. The conjugate vaccines, however, show higher impact and effectiveness with longer-lasting protection over the polysaccharide vaccines. Given the variance in potential use of a meningococcal vaccine, epidemiological surveillance systems should be strengthened to inform national decisions .

          RESUMEN

          Objetivos.

          Resumir y evaluar críticamente los datos científicos sobre la repercusión y la eficacia de los programas de vacunación antimeningocócica en todo el mundo para orientar la toma de decisiones en América Latina y el Caribe.

          Métodos.

          Se realizó un examen de la bibliografía siguiendo varios componentes de las directrices correspondientes a los elementos de notificación preferidos para revisiones sistemáticas y metanálisis. Se hicieron búsquedas en PubMed Central® para encontrar documentos publicados en cualquier idioma desde enero de 1999 hasta marzo del 2017.

          Resultados.

          En total, se incluyeron 32 estudios, en cuya mayoría se evaluaba la vacuna antimeningocócica conjugada contra el serotipo C. En 14 estudios se midió la efectividad y en 30, el impacto. La efectividad de las vacunas polisacarídeas se encontraba entre 65% y 83,7% (grupos etarios diferentes), mientras que la de las vacunas conjugadas, entre 66% y 100%. Gracias a la vacuna conjugada, la disminución de la incidencia de la enfermedad meningocócica confirmada en laboratorio varió entre 77% y 100% en diferentes grupos etarios. En el único estudio en el que se evaluó la vacuna de subunidades proteínicas se notificó que su efectividad era de 82,9%.

          Conclusiones.

          Los estudios examinados muestran el impacto y la efectividad tanto de las vacunas polisacarídeas como de las vacunas conjugadas en relación con la enfermedad meningocócica causada por los serotipos utilizados en las vacunas. Sin embargo, las vacunas conjugadas demuestran que tienen un mayor impacto y efectividad que las vacunas polisacarídeas para dar una protección más duradera. En vista de la varianza del posible uso de una vacuna antimeningocócica, se deben fortalecer los sistemas de vigilancia epidemiológica para orientar las decisiones nacionales.

          RESUMO

          Objetivos.

          Sumarizar e analisar de maneira crítica as evidências sobre o impacto e a efetividade dos programas de vacinação contra doença meningocócica em todo o mundo para subsidiar a tomada de decisão na América Latina e no Caribe.

          Métodos.

          Uma revisão da literatura científica foi realizada de acordo com vários componentes das diretrizes dos Principais itens para relatar revisões sistemáticas e meta-análises (PRISMA). Foi feita uma pesquisa da base de dados PubMed Central® em busca de estudos publicados em qualquer idioma de janeiro de 1999 a março de 2017.

          Resultados.

          Trinta e dois estudos foram selecionados, sendo que a maioria avaliou a vacina conjugada contra o meningococo C. Quatorze artigos avaliaram a efetividade da vacina e 30, o impacto. A efetividade das vacinas polissacarídicas foi de 65% a 83,7% (em diferentes faixas etárias) e a das vacinas conjugadas foi de 66% a 100%. A redução com o uso da vacina conjugada da incidência de doença meningocócica confirmada por laboratório variou de 77% a 100% em diferentes faixas etárias. O único estudo que avaliou a vacina de subunidade proteica informou uma efetividade de 82,9%.

          Conclusões.

          Os estudos examinados indicam impacto e efetividade da vacina polissacarídica e da vacina conjugada para doença meningocócica do respectivo sorogrupo vacinal. As vacinas conjugadas demonstram maior impacto e efetividade e proteção mais duradoura em relação às vacinas polissacarídicas. Diante da variação do uso em potencial da vacina meningocócica, os sistemas de vigilância epidemiológica devem ser reforçados visando subsidiar a tomada de decisão das autoridades nacionais.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effectiveness and impact of a reduced infant schedule of 4CMenB vaccine against group B meningococcal disease in England: a national observational cohort study.

          In September, 2015, the UK became the first country to introduce the multicomponent group B meningococcal (MenB) vaccine (4CMenB, Bexsero) into a publicly funded national immunisation programme. A reduced two-dose priming schedule was offered to infants at 2 months and 4 months, alongside an opportunistic catch-up for 3 month and 4 month olds. 4CMenB was predicted to protect against 73-88% of MenB strains. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and impact of 4CMenB in vaccine-eligible infants in England.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effectiveness of meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccine 4 years after introduction.

            The meningococcal serogroup C conjugate (MCC) vaccine programme in England has successfully controlled the incidence of serogroup C disease, as a result of high short-term vaccine effectiveness and substantial herd immunity. However, the long-term effectiveness of the vaccine remains unknown. We assessed surveillance data from the 4 years since introduction of the programme. Vaccine effectiveness remained high in children vaccinated in the catch-up campaign (aged 5 months to 18 years). However, for children vaccinated in the routine infant immunisation programme, the effectiveness of the MCC vaccine fell to low levels after only 1 year. The number of individuals in these cohorts remains low, but alternative routine immunisation schedules should be considered to ensure high levels of protection are sustained.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Vaccine effects and impact of vaccination programmes in post-licensure studies.

              Once a vaccine is licensed and introduced in the population, post-licensure studies are required to measure vaccine effectiveness and impact of vaccination programmes on the population at large. However, confusion still prevails around these concepts, making it difficult to discern which effects are measured in such studies and how their findings should be interpreted. We review from the public health evaluation perspective the effects of vaccine-related exposures, describe the methods used to measure them and their assumptions. We distinguish effects due to exposure to individual vaccination from those due to exposure to a vaccination programme, as the latter depends on vaccine coverage, other population factors and includes indirect effects as well. Vaccine (direct) effectiveness is estimated by comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals exposed to the same vaccination programme. The impact of a vaccination programme, defined here as the population prevented fraction when exposure is the programme, is measured by comparing populations with and without a vaccination programme, most commonly the same population before and after vaccination. These designs are based on a number of assumptions for valid inference. In particular, they assume that vaccinees and non-vaccinees do not differ in terms of susceptibility and exposure to the disease or in ascertainment of vaccination and disease status. In pre and post-vaccination design, the population is assumed to have similar baseline transmission, case detection and reporting, risk factors and medical practices in both periods. These principles are frequently violated in post-licensure studies. Potential confounding and biases must be minimized in study design and analyses, or taken into account during result interpretation. It is also essential to define which exposure is evaluated (individual vaccination or vaccination programme) and which effect is measured. This may help decision-makers clarify which type of study is needed and how to interpret the results. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Rev Panam Salud Publica
                Rev. Panam. Salud Publica
                rpsp
                Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
                Organización Panamericana de la Salud
                1020-4989
                1680-5348
                20 December 2017
                2017
                : 41
                : e158
                Affiliations
                [1 ] normalizedComprehensive Family Immunization Unit orgnamePan American Health Organization, Regional Office of the World Health Organization Washington, DC United States of America originalComprehensive Family Immunization Unit, Pan American Health Organization, Regional Office of the World Health Organization, Washington, DC, United States of America.
                [2 ] normalizedAlbert B. Sabin Vaccine Institute orgnameAlbert B. Sabin Vaccine Institute Washington, DC United States originalAlbert B. Sabin Vaccine Institute, Washington, DC, United States.
                [3 ] normalizedHospital Gutierrez orgnameHospital Gutierrez Buenos Aires Argentina originalHospital Gutierrez, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
                Author notes
                Send correspondence to Lucia Helena De Oliveira, oliveirl@ 123456paho.org

                Conflict of interests:

                None declared.

                Article
                RPSP.2017.158
                10.26633/RPSP.2017.158
                6660876
                58dc78eb-a6d4-45ac-a5a1-0bd62560cd11

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 IGO License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. No modifications or commercial use of this article are permitted. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that PAHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the PAHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL.

                History
                : 02 May 2017
                : 11 August 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 5, Equations: 0, References: 47
                Categories
                Review

                meningococcal vaccines,immunization programs,decision making,prevention & control,review,latin america.,vacunas meningococicas,programas de inmunización,toma de decisiones, prevención & control,revision,américa latina,vacinas meningocócicas,programas de imunização,tomada de decisões, prevenção & controle,revisão

                Comments

                Comment on this article