12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Equidade, graça e pluralismo na administração liberal? Para uma história das flexibilidades do direito (Conselho de Estado Brasileiro, 1841-1889). Translated title: Equity, pardon, and pluralism in the liberal administration? Towards a history of the flexibilities of law (Brazilian Council of State, 1841-1889).

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumo O século XIX foi a era do legalismo, e geralmente pensa-se o direito administrativo como se estivesse fundado na legalidade. Entretanto, o direito administrativo oitocentista tinha à disposição um amplo arsenal de mecanismos de flexibilização. O nosso objetivo é abordar aqueles presentes na atividade do Conselho de Estado brasileiro, órgão de cúpula da administração durante o Império, mostrando como tais mecanismos funcionavam e por que existiam. Identificámos, na nossa análise, os seguintes: o uso da equidade, para corrigir insuficiências da legislação sobre funcionários públicos; a graça, para corrigir defeitos das leis punitivas e erros de julgamento; e a atividade interpretativa num cenário de pluralismo normativo e jurisdicional, para mitigar as incertezas da administração eclesiástica.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract The 19th century was the age of legalism, and it is generally thought that administrative law was founded upon legality. Nevertheless, 19th-century administrative law had several mechanisms of flexibility at its disposal. Our objective is to address those present in the activity of the Brazilian Council of State, the highest administrative body during the Empire, showing how these mechanisms worked and why they existed. In our analysis, we identified the following: equity, to correct insufficiencies of the legislation on public servants; pardon, to correct the malfunctioning of punitive laws and miscarriages of justice; and the interpretative activity in a scenario of normative and jurisdictional pluralism, to mitigate the uncertainties of ecclesiastical administration.

          Related collections

          Most cited references84

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Governance as theory: five propositions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Diccionario de lingua brasileira

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Questão de Consciência: os ultramontanos no Brasil e o regalismo do Segundo Reinado (1840-1889)

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                aso
                Análise Social
                Anál. Social
                Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa (Lisboa, , Portugal )
                0003-2573
                December 2021
                : 241
                : 720-742
                Affiliations
                [1] Frankfurt am Main orgnameMax Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory Alemanha martins@ 123456lhlt.mpg.de
                [2] Firenze orgnameUniversità degli Studi di Firenze Italy arthurbarretto@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S0003-25732021000400720 S0003-2573(21)00024100720
                10.31447/as00032573.2021241.06
                57366304-fa7e-4853-9c04-f144b31aacf7

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 24 June 2020
                : 04 January 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 84, Pages: 23
                Product

                SciELO Portugal

                Self URI: Texto completo somente em PDF (PT)
                Categories
                Dossiê

                Conselho de Estado brasileiro,Administrative law,equity,pardon,legal pluralism Brazilian Council of State,Direito administrativo,equidade,graça,pluralismo jurídico

                Comments

                Comment on this article