16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Worldwide Presence of National Anesthesia Societies on Four Major Social Networks in 2021: Observational Case Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Although the presence of medical societies on social networks (SNs) could be interesting for disseminating professional information, there is no study investigating their presence on SNs.

          Objective

          The aim of this viewpoint is to describe the worldwide presence and activity of national anesthesia societies on SNs.

          Methods

          This observational study assessed the active presence (≥1 post in the year preceding the collection date) of the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists member societies on the SNs Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube. We collected data concerning each anesthesia society on the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists website.

          Results

          Among the 136 societies, 66 (48.5%) had an active presence on at least one SN. The most used SN was Facebook (n=60, 44.1%), followed by Twitter (n=37, 27.2%), YouTube (n=26, 19.1%), and Instagram (n=16, 11.8%). The SN with the largest number of followers was Facebook for 52 (78.8%) societies and Twitter for 12 (18.2%) societies. The number of followers was 361 (IQR 75-1806) on Twitter, 2494 (IQR 1049-5369) on Facebook, 1400 (IQR 303-3058) on Instagram, and 214 (IQR 33-955) on YouTube. There was a strong correlation between the number of posts and the number of followers on Twitter ( r=0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.97; P<.001), Instagram ( r=0.83, 95% CI 0.58-0.94; P<.001), and YouTube ( r=0.69, 95% CI 0.42-0.85; P<.001). According to the density of anesthetists in the country, there was no difference between societies with and without active SN accounts.

          Conclusions

          Less than half of national anesthesia societies have at least one active account on SNs. Twitter and Facebook are the most used SNs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

          Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The WFSA Global Anesthesia Workforce Survey

            Safe anesthesia and surgical care are not available when needed for 5 billion of the world's 7 billion people. There are major deficiencies in the specialist surgical workforce in many parts of the world, and specific data on the anesthesia workforce are lacking.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Use of Social Media in Graduate Medical Education

              Despite the growing presence of social media in graduate medical education (GME), few studies have attempted to characterize their effect on residents and their training. The authors conducted a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature to understand the effect of social media on resident (1) education, (2) recruitment, and (3) professionalism.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Perioper Med
                JMIR Perioper Med
                JPeriOp
                JMIR Perioperative Medicine
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2561-9128
                Jan-Dec 2022
                20 July 2022
                : 5
                : 1
                : e34549
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Rouen University Hospital Rouen France
                [2 ] Rouen Medical School University of Rouen Normandy Rouen France
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Thomas Clavier thomasclavier76@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8630-7537
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2364-8662
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6826-4331
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4470-1816
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1312-1907
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5977-7090
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1395-1601
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0267-0986
                Article
                v5i1e34549
                10.2196/34549
                9350816
                35857379
                572d86cf-0c9a-405f-8446-79a26fe8cd1f
                ©Thomas Clavier, Emilie Occhiali, Claire Guenet, Naurine Vannier, Camille Hache, Vincent Compere, Jean Selim, Emmanuel Besnier. Originally published in JMIR Perioperative Medicine (http://periop.jmir.org), 20.07.2022.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Perioperative Medicine, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://periop.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 28 October 2021
                : 21 April 2022
                : 26 April 2022
                : 20 June 2022
                Categories
                Viewpoint
                Viewpoint

                social network, social media,anaesthesia,society,facebook,twitter,instagram,youtube

                Comments

                Comment on this article