21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Are policymakers responsive to public demand in climate politics?

      , ,
      Journal of Public Policy
      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Normative theories of democracy agree that public demand should be the main guide in policymaking. But positive theories and related empirical research disagree about the extent to which this holds true in reality. We address this debate with an empirical focus on climate change policy. Specifically, we are interested in whether observable variation in public demand for climate change mitigation can help explain variation in adopted national climate policies. Using our own data to approximate public demand, we estimate the responsiveness of policymakers to changes in public demand in six OECD countries from 1995 to 2010. We find that policymakers are responsive and react in predicted ways to variation in our opinion component of measured public demand, rather than to the mere salience of the climate issue. The effect of issue salience is strongest in combination with our opinion measure as this creates a scope for action. The results underscore the importance and usefulness of our concept and empirical measures for public demand, as well as of our disaggregated analysis of climate policy outputs in this area.

          Related collections

          Most cited references86

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The tragedy of the commons.

          (1968)
          The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Fixed Effects Regression Models

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts

              Politics and political conflict often occur in the written and spoken word. Scholars have long recognized this, but the massive costs of analyzing even moderately sized collections of texts have hindered their use in political science research. Here lies the promise of automated text analysis: it substantially reduces the costs of analyzing large collections of text. We provide a guide to this exciting new area of research and show how, in many instances, the methods have already obtained part of their promise. But there are pitfalls to using automated methods—they are no substitute for careful thought and close reading and require extensive and problem-specific validation. We survey a wide range of new methods, provide guidance on how to validate the output of the models, and clarify misconceptions and errors in the literature. To conclude, we argue that for automated text methods to become a standard tool for political scientists, methodologists must contribute new methods and new methods of validation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Journal of Public Policy
                J. Pub. Pol.
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                0143-814X
                1469-7815
                March 2022
                July 08 2021
                March 2022
                : 42
                : 1
                : 136-164
                Article
                10.1017/S0143814X21000088
                56f5f111-4009-4514-a975-9609dd63ff13
                © 2022

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article