8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The effects of plate interface rheology on subduction kinematics and dynamics

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          SUMMARY

          Tectonic plate motions predominantly result from a balance between the potential energy change of the subducting slab and viscous dissipation in the mantle, bending lithosphere and slab–upper plate interface. A wide range of observations from active subduction zones and exhumed rocks suggest that subduction interface shear zone rheology is sensitive to the composition of subducting crustal material—for example, sediments versus mafic igneous oceanic crust. Here we use 2-D numerical models of dynamically consistent subduction to systematically investigate how subduction interface viscosity influences large-scale subduction kinematics and dynamics. Our model consists of an oceanic slab subducting beneath an overriding continental plate. The slab includes an oceanic crustal/weak layer that controls the rheology of the interface. We implement a range of slab and interface strengths and explore how the kinematics respond for an initial upper mantle slab stage, and subsequent quasi-steady-state ponding near a viscosity jump at the 660-km-discontinuity. If material properties are suitably averaged, our results confirm the effect of interface strength on plate motions as based on simplified viscous dissipation analysis: a ∼2 order of magnitude increase in interface viscosity can decrease convergence speeds by ∼1 order of magnitude. However, the full dynamic solutions show a range of interesting behaviour including an interplay between interface strength and overriding plate topography and an end-member weak interface-weak slab case that results in slab break-off/tearing. Additionally, for models with a spatially limited, weak sediment strip embedded in regular interface material, as might be expected for the subduction of different types of oceanic materials through Earth’s history, the transient response of enhanced rollback and subduction velocity is different for strong and weak slabs. Our work substantiates earlier suggestions as to the importance of the plate interface, and expands the range of quantifiable links between plate reorganizations, the nature of the incoming and overriding plate and the potential geological record.

          Related collections

          Most cited references130

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Observations at convergent margins concerning sediment subduction, subduction erosion, and the growth of continental crust

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Subducted slabs and the geoid: Constraints on mantle rheology and flow

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Slab breakoff: A model of lithosphere detachment and its test in the magmatism and deformation of collisional orogens

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Geophysical Journal International
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0956-540X
                1365-246X
                August 2022
                April 13 2022
                August 2022
                April 13 2022
                February 22 2022
                : 230
                : 2
                : 796-812
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Geological Institute, Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zurich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
                [2 ]Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway Miami, FL 33149-1031, USA
                [3 ]Institute for Geophysics, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, J.J. Pickle Research Campus, Bldg. 196 10100 Burnet Road, Austin, TX 78758-4445, USA
                [4 ]Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 2275 Speedway Stop C9000, Austin, TX 78712-1722, USA
                [5 ]Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 201 E. 24th Street, Austin, Texas 78712-1229, USA
                [6 ]Dipartimento Scienze, Laboratory of Experimental Tectonics, University of Roma Tre, L.S.L. Murialdo 1, Roma 00146, Italy
                [7 ]Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ, German Research Centre for Geosciences Potsdam (Germany), Telegrafenberg D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
                Article
                10.1093/gji/ggac075
                565b7c4a-9ee1-4776-a38a-3fb7ab466daf
                © 2022

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article