10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Use of two novel trailer types for transportation of pigs to slaughter. I. Effects on trailer microclimate, pig behaviour, physiological response, and meat quality under Canadian summer conditions

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A total of 3366 pigs were transported to slaughter in summer (six replicates/trailer type; July-August in southwestern Ontario) using three trailers: a modified triple-deck pot-belly (MPB), an advanced flat-deck (AFD), and a standard pot-belly (SPB). Within trailers, ambient conditions, temperature (T °C), relative humidity (RH%), and temperature-humidity-index (THI), were monitored in three compartments (bottom front, BF, middle deck, MM, and top rear, TR). A total of 162 pigs were selected for the analysis of hematocrit, lactate, and creatine kinase (CK) levels in exsanguination blood and for the evaluation of pork quality as assessed in the longissimus (LM), semimembranosus (SM), and adductor (AD) muscles. The AFD and MPB trailers presented lower ( P < 0.01) T°C and THI compared to the SPB during transit. In the SPB trailer, pigs transported in the MM compartment showed higher ( P < 0.01) blood CK concentrations than those transported in the BF compartment and lower pHu values in the SM and AD muscles ( P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively) than those transported in the TR compartment. Although the AFD trailer design provided a better microclimate for pigs, the improvements in the design of the novel trailers only slightly reduced stress in pigs during summer transits.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The use of filter paper to estimate drip loss of porcine musculature.

          Two simple, accurate, rapid and economical methods for determining variations in drip loss of lean, prepackaged, post-rigor porcine musculature during storage have been developed. Laboratory grade filter paper having a 45 mm diameter was placed on the cut surface of the muscle (after 10-15 minutes' exposure) and scored for wetness (0 to 5) within 3 s or weighed for fluid accumulation. The tests on 40 randomly selected longissimus muscles that appeared to represent 'normal' quality characteristics proved to be nearly perfectly and positively correlated to % 48 h drip loss. Statistically, the relationship was non-curvilinear and, when regression equations were used to predict drip losses on a separate group of 27 muscles having considerable variation in quality, the correlations between the predicted and actual values were nearly perfect (r = 0·97 for score and 0·95 for weight). These two methods have not been compared to other, more sophisticated, ones currently used, but the results of this investigation suggest that the two methods may be useful to the meat industry, especially for practical applications. Copyright © 1986. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effects of different moving devices at loading on stress response and meat quality in pigs.

            Although there is increasing evidence regarding the negative welfare and meat quality implications of electric prod use for slaughter-weight pigs, this handling tool continues to be used. Therefore, the behavioral and physiological response and carcass and meat quality of 360 pigs being loaded onto a truck for transportation to slaughter according to 3 handling procedures were studied. The 3 handling procedures were 1) moving with an electric prod and board from the finishing pen to the truck (EP); 2) moving with a board and a paddle from the finishing pen to the truck (PAD); 3) moving with a board and a paddle from the finishing pen and using a compressed air prod in the ramp before going into the truck (CAP). A subpopulation of 144 pigs (48 pigs/treatment) was equipped with heart rate monitors. Blood samples were collected from the same animals at exsanguination for the analysis of creatine phosphokinase and lactate. Data were analyzed using an ANOVA for factorial design, with the animal as the experimental unit. Behavior was analyzed with MIXED model procedure with treatment as a fixed effect. During loading, EP pigs slipped and fell (P < 0.001) and overlapped (P = 0.03) more often, but stopped (P < 0.001) and attempted turns (P = 0.01) less often than CAP or PAD. With CAP, pigs made more 180° turns (P = 0.01) than with PAD or EP. Loading with EP led to more and longer vocalizations (P = 0.02 and P = 0.001, respectively) than loading with CAP or PAD. Loading took longest with CAP and was quickest with EP (P = 0.01). Pigs handled with EP had a greater heart rate than those moved with PAD and CAP at loading (P < 0.001), wait at loading (P < 0.001), at unloading (P = 0.05), and in lairage (P = 0.02). Pigs loaded with EP had greater (P = 0.05) lactate concentrations in blood at exsanguination compared with pigs handled with CAP, with pigs loaded with PAD being intermediate. Furthermore, ultimate pH values in the semimembranosus and adductor muscles of EP pigs were greater (P = 0.002 and P = 0.004, respectively) compared with those from PAD and CAP pigs. Greater (P = 0.04) incidence of blood-splashed hams was found in EP pigs compared with PAD and CAP pigs. Therefore, considering animal welfare, carcass bruising, and blood splashes standpoints, EP should be replaced with PAD or CAP. However, additional research is necessary to identify methods that improve the loading efficiencies of PAD and CAP without adversely affecting animal welfare parameters.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A Review of Swine Transportation Research on Priority Welfare Issues: A Canadian Perspective

              The purpose of this review is to present the best available scientific knowledge on key animal welfare issues during swine transport, such as transport duration and distance, time off feed and water, rest intervals, environmental conditions, loading density, and transport of young animals, based on their impact on stress, injury, fatigue, dehydration, body temperature, mortality, and carcass and meat quality. The review was limited to this set of priority welfare issues which were identified by the National Farm Animal Care Council (NFACC) Scientific Committee to help with the development of the livestock transportation Codes of Practice. This review focuses primarily on research related to the transport of market pigs (100–135 kg) which is a reflection of the current literature available on pig transportation. This information presented here can be used to support other animal welfare codes, guidelines, standards or legislations regulating the welfare of pigs during transport. Based on the available literature, clear conclusions can be drawn on the impact of vehicle design, pre-transport fasting, control of environmental conditions and loading density on the welfare of pigs during transport and on pork quality. However, the effects of journey duration are still unclear and a recommendation on the maximum transport time cannot be provided. Further studies investigating the impact of factors, such as ambient conditions within the transport vehicle, loading density at extreme ambient conditions, travel distances, maximum travel duration, rest/stop duration, and management of pigs during rest stops are required. More specifically, further research in relation to the welfare of market weight, newly weaned and breeding pigs, and cull sows and boars during transport is needed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Canadian Journal of Animal Science
                Can. J. Anim. Sci.
                Canadian Science Publishing
                0008-3984
                1918-1825
                June 20 2022
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
                [2 ]AAFC, Sherbrooke R&D Centre, Sherbrooke, QC J1M 0C8, Canada
                [3 ]Department of Food Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
                [4 ]Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
                Article
                10.1139/CJAS-2022-0023
                55f6ea95-94a7-4817-9acb-0fad182c32e8
                © 2022

                http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article