4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of Rovalpituzumab Tesirine on Ventricular Repolarization in Patients With Small‐Cell Lung Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with few treatment options. Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova‐T) is an antibody‐drug conjugate that targets delta‐like 3 on SCLC cells to deliver a cytotoxic payload directly to tumor cells. In this study, the cardiac safety profile of Rova‐T was assessed by evaluating changes in QT interval, electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform, heart rate, and proarrhythmic adverse events (AEs) after treatment with Rova‐T in patients with previously treated extensive‐stage SCLC. Patients underwent ECG monitoring for 2 weeks after each of 2 i.v. infusions of 0.3 mg/kg Rova‐T over 30 minutes, administered 6 weeks apart. Forty‐six patients received at least one dose of Rova‐T. At the geometric mean Rova‐T maximum serum concentration of 7,940 ng/mL, ECG monitoring showed no significant changes in the Fridericia‐corrected QT (QTcF) interval; the upper limit of the 2‐sided 90% confidence interval did not exceed 10 msec for any time point. There were no clinically significant changes in QRS or PR intervals, ECG waveforms, or heart rate after Rova‐T administration. All patients experienced a treatment‐emergent AE (TEAE); 78% had a grade ≥ 3 TEAE, 59% had a serious TEAE, and 41% had a cardiac‐related TEAE. The TEAEs that might signal proarrhythmia tendencies were uncommon. Confirmed partial responses were observed in 24% of patients. Based on the evaluation of ECG data collected in this study from patients treated with Rova‐T at 0.3 mg/kg i.v. administered every 6 weeks, a QTcF effect of clinical concern can be excluded.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Lung Cancer Statistics.

          Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among both men and women in the United States. It is also the leading cause of cancer death among men and the second leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. Lung cancer rates and trends vary substantially by sex, age, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geography because of differences in historical smoking patterns. Lung cancer mortality rates in the United States are highest among males, blacks, people of lower socioeconomic status, and in the mid-South (e.g., Kentucky, Mississippi, Arkansas, and Tennessee). Globally, rates are highest in countries where smoking uptake began earliest, such as those in North America and Europe. Although rates are now decreasing in most of these countries (e.g., United States, United Kingdom, Australia), especially in men, they are increasing in countries where smoking uptake occurred later. Low- and middle-income countries now account for more than 50% of lung cancer deaths each year. This chapter reviews lung cancer incidence and mortality patterns in the United States and globally.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Emerging therapies for small cell lung cancer

            Currently, chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for first- and second-line management of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Immunotherapy has made progress in the treatment of SCLC, and nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab have led to significant improvements in clinical outcomes of SCLC. Regarding options in other classes of therapy, the cytotoxic drug lurbinectedin was granted orphan drug status based on a remarkable objective response rate of 39.3%. In addition, an increase in progression-free survival (PFS) was achieved in a phase II study of anlotinib (ALTER 1202). Future prospects for even better outcomes in SCLC lie in novel ways to integrate immunotherapy and small-molecule TKI drugs. Innovative clinical trial designs are needed to efficiently explore the increasing number of options with new drugs and new combinations thereof for SCLC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Phase III trial comparing supportive care alone with supportive care with oral topotecan in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

              For patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), further chemotherapy is routinely considered at relapse after first-line therapy. However, proof of clinical benefit has not been documented. This study randomly assigned patients with relapsed SCLC not considered as candidates for standard intravenous therapy to best supportive care (BSC) alone (n = 70) or oral topotecan (2.3 mg/m2/d, days 1 through 5, every 21 days) plus BSC (topotecan; n = 71). In the intent-to-treat population, survival (primary end point) was prolonged in the topotecan group (log-rank P = .0104). Median survival with BSC was 13.9 weeks (95% CI, 11.1 to 18.6) and with topotecan, 25.9 weeks (95% CI, 18.3 to 31.6). Statistical significance for survival was maintained in a subgroup of patients with a short treatment-free interval (< or = 60 days). Response to topotecan was 7% partial and 44% stable disease. Patients on topotecan had slower quality of life deterioration and greater symptom control. Principal toxicities with topotecan were hematological: grade 4 neutropenia, 33%; grade 4 thrombocytopenia, 7%; and grade 3/4 anemia, 25%. Comparing topotecan with BSC, infection grade 2 was 14% versus 12% and sepsis 4% versus 1%; other grade 3/4 events included vomiting 3% versus 0, diarrhea 6% versus 0, dyspnea 3% versus 9%, and pain 3% versus 6%. Toxic deaths occurred in four patients (6%) in the topotecan arm. All cause mortality within 30 days of random assignment was 13% on BSC and 7% on topotecan. Chemotherapy with oral topotecan is associated with prolongation of survival and quality of life benefit in patients with relapsed SCLC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jwgoldman@mednet.ucla.edu
                Journal
                Clin Transl Sci
                Clin Transl Sci
                10.1111/(ISSN)1752-8062
                CTS
                Clinical and Translational Science
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1752-8054
                1752-8062
                19 December 2020
                March 2021
                : 14
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1111/cts.v14.2 )
                : 664-670
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles California USA
                [ 2 ] Mary Crowley Cancer Research Center Dallas Texas USA
                [ 3 ] Lurie Cancer Center of Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA
                [ 4 ] Hillman Cancer Center at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
                [ 5 ] University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Cleveland Ohio USA
                [ 6 ] Riverside Peninsula Cancer Institute Newport News Virginia USA
                [ 7 ] Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University Atlanta Georgia USA
                [ 8 ] Prisma Health Cancer Institute Greenville South Carolina USA
                [ 9 ] Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada
                [ 10 ] AbbVie, Inc. Illinois North Chicago USA
                [ 11 ] Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center Buffalo New York USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence: Jonathan W. Goldman ( jwgoldman@ 123456mednet.ucla.edu )

                Article
                CTS12928
                10.1111/cts.12928
                7993269
                33340277
                52d87b49-bd20-4047-8bc4-2f8fc191da30
                © 2020 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 11 August 2020
                : 10 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 5, Pages: 7, Words: 6615
                Funding
                Funded by: AbbVie , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100006483;
                Categories
                Article
                Research
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                March 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.9 mode:remove_FC converted:25.03.2021

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article