16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Efficacy and Usability of an Unguided Web-Based Grief Intervention for Adults Who Lost a Loved One During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Randomized Controlled Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The death of a loved one was a challenge many people faced during the COVID-19 pandemic within the context of extraordinary circumstances and great uncertainty. Grief is an unavoidable part of life, and for most people, feelings of grief decrease naturally over time. However, for some people, grieving can become a particularly painful process with clinical symptoms that may require professional help to resolve. To provide psychological support to people who had lost a loved one during the COVID-19 pandemic, an unguided web-based psychological intervention was developed.

          Objective

          The main objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the web-based treatment, Grief COVID (Duelo COVID in Spanish; ITLAB), in reducing clinical symptoms of complicated grief, depression, posttraumatic stress, hopelessness, anxiety, and suicidal risk in adults. The secondary aim was to validate the usability of the self-applied intervention system.

          Methods

          We used a randomized controlled trial with an intervention group (IG) and a waitlist control group (CG). The groups were assessed 3 times (before beginning the intervention, upon completing the intervention, and 3 months after the intervention). The intervention was delivered on the web in an asynchronous format through the Duelo COVID web page. Participants created an account that could be used on their computers, smartphones, or tablets. The evaluation process was automated as part of the intervention.

          Results

          A total of 114 participants were randomly assigned to the IG or CG and met criteria for inclusion in the study (n=45, 39.5% completed the intervention and n=69, 60.5% completed the waitlist period). Most participants (103/114, 90.4%) were women. The results indicated that the treatment significantly reduced baseline clinical symptoms in the IG for all variables ( P<.001 to P=.006), with larger effect sizes for depression, hopelessness, grief, anxiety, and risk of suicide (all effect sizes ≥0.5). The follow-up evaluation showed that symptom reduction was maintained at 3 months after the intervention. The results from the CG showed that participants experienced significantly decreased levels of hopelessness after completing the time on the waitlist ( P<.001), but their suicidal risk scores increased. Regarding the usability of the self-applied intervention system, the results indicated a high level of satisfaction with the Grief COVID.

          Conclusions

          The self-applied web-based intervention Grief COVID was effective in reducing symptoms of anxiety, depression, hopelessness, risk of suicide risk, posttraumatic stress disorder, and complicated grief disorder. Grief COVID was evaluated by the participants, who reported that the system was easy to use. These results affirm the importance of developing additional web-based psychological tools to help reduce clinical symptoms in people experiencing grief because of the loss of a loved one during a pandemic.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04638842; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04638842

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7.

          Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common mental disorders; however, there is no brief clinical measure for assessing GAD. The objective of this study was to develop a brief self-report scale to identify probable cases of GAD and evaluate its reliability and validity. A criterion-standard study was performed in 15 primary care clinics in the United States from November 2004 through June 2005. Of a total of 2740 adult patients completing a study questionnaire, 965 patients had a telephone interview with a mental health professional within 1 week. For criterion and construct validity, GAD self-report scale diagnoses were compared with independent diagnoses made by mental health professionals; functional status measures; disability days; and health care use. A 7-item anxiety scale (GAD-7) had good reliability, as well as criterion, construct, factorial, and procedural validity. A cut point was identified that optimized sensitivity (89%) and specificity (82%). Increasing scores on the scale were strongly associated with multiple domains of functional impairment (all 6 Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey scales and disability days). Although GAD and depression symptoms frequently co-occurred, factor analysis confirmed them as distinct dimensions. Moreover, GAD and depression symptoms had differing but independent effects on functional impairment and disability. There was good agreement between self-report and interviewer-administered versions of the scale. The GAD-7 is a valid and efficient tool for screening for GAD and assessing its severity in clinical practice and research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Grief During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Considerations for Palliative Care Providers

              The COVID-19 pandemic is anticipated to continue spreading widely across the globe throughout 2020. To mitigate the devastating impact of COVID-19, social distancing and visitor restrictions in healthcare facilities have been widely implemented. Such policies and practices, along with the direct impact of the spread of COVID-19, complicate issues of grief that are relevant to medical providers. We describe the relationship of the COVID-19 pandemic to anticipatory grief, disenfranchised grief, and complicated grief for individuals, families, and their providers. Further, we provide discussion regarding countering this grief through communication, advance care planning, and self-care practices. We provide resources for healthcare providers, in addition to calling on palliative care providers to consider their own role as a resource to other specialties during this public health emergency.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Med Internet Res
                J Med Internet Res
                JMIR
                Journal of Medical Internet Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1439-4456
                1438-8871
                2023
                6 April 2023
                6 April 2023
                : 25
                : e43839
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Psychology, Health and Technology University of Twente Enschede Netherlands
                [2 ] Health Sciences Area Valencian International University Valencia Spain
                [3 ] Department of Psychiatry Universidad de Sevilla Seville Spain
                [4 ] School of Medicine and Health Sciences Tecnologico de Monterrey Guadalajara Mexico
                [5 ] School of Psychology Universidad Internacional del Ecuador Quito Ecuador
                [6 ] Faculty of Higher Studies Iztacala National Autonomous University of Mexico State of Mexico Mexico
                [7 ] Department of Behavioral Sciences Centro Universitario de los Valles Universidad de Guadalajara Guadalajara Mexico
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Paulina Erika Herdoiza-Arroyo pherdoiza@ 123456uide.edu.ec
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3547-8824
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6801-0836
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2952-2836
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2287-816X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8111-3880
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3527-1500
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2158-2903
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6351-5269
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7211-6350
                Article
                v25i1e43839
                10.2196/43839
                10131766
                36877800
                52c73ae3-765e-4e81-90ae-458d7d2685b7
                ©Alejandro Dominguez-Rodriguez, Sergio Sanz-Gomez, Leivy Patricia González Ramírez, Paulina Erika Herdoiza-Arroyo, Lorena Edith Trevino Garcia, Anabel de la Rosa-Gómez, Joel Omar González-Cantero, Valeria Macias-Aguinaga, Melina Miaja. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 06.04.2023.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 26 October 2022
                : 29 November 2022
                : 24 December 2022
                : 27 February 2023
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                Medicine
                web-based intervention,usability,complicated grief,hopelessness,suicidal risk,depression,anxiety,posttraumatic stress,mobile phone

                Comments

                Comment on this article