19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Higher risk of death from COVID-19 in low-income and non-White populations of São Paulo, Brazil

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Little evidence exists on the differential health effects of COVID-19 on disadvantaged population groups. Here we characterise the differential risk of hospitalisation and death in São Paulo state, Brazil, and show how vulnerability to COVID-19 is shaped by socioeconomic inequalities.

          Methods

          We conducted a cross-sectional study using hospitalised severe acute respiratory infections notified from March to August 2020 in the Sistema de Monitoramento Inteligente de São Paulo database. We examined the risk of hospitalisation and death by race and socioeconomic status using multiple data sets for individual-level and spatiotemporal analyses. We explained these inequalities according to differences in daily mobility from mobile phone data, teleworking behaviour and comorbidities.

          Results

          Throughout the study period, patients living in the 40% poorest areas were more likely to die when compared with patients living in the 5% wealthiest areas (OR: 1.60, 95% CI 1.48 to 1.74) and were more likely to be hospitalised between April and July 2020 (OR: 1.08, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.12). Black and Pardo individuals were more likely to be hospitalised when compared with White individuals (OR: 1.41, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.46; OR: 1.26, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.28, respectively), and were more likely to die (OR: 1.13, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.19; 1.07, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.10, respectively) between April and July 2020. Once hospitalised, patients treated in public hospitals were more likely to die than patients in private hospitals (OR: 1.40%, 95% CI 1.34% to 1.46%). Black individuals and those with low education attainment were more likely to have one or more comorbidities, respectively (OR: 1.29, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.39; 1.36, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.45).

          Conclusions

          Low-income and Black and Pardo communities are more likely to die with COVID-19. This is associated with differential access to quality healthcare, ability to self-isolate and the higher prevalence of comorbidities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities

          This essay examines the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic for health inequalities. It outlines historical and contemporary evidence of inequalities in pandemics—drawing on international research into the Spanish influenza pandemic of 1918, the H1N1 outbreak of 2009 and the emerging international estimates of socio-economic, ethnic and geographical inequalities in COVID-19 infection and mortality rates. It then examines how these inequalities in COVID-19 are related to existing inequalities in chronic diseases and the social determinants of health, arguing that we are experiencing a syndemic pandemic. It then explores the potential consequences for health inequalities of the lockdown measures implemented internationally as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the likely unequal impacts of the economic crisis. The essay concludes by reflecting on the longer-term public health policy responses needed to ensure that the COVID-19 pandemic does not increase health inequalities for future generations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Psychosocial impact of COVID-19

            Background Along with its high infectivity and fatality rates, the 2019 Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) has caused universal psychosocial impact by causing mass hysteria, economic burden and financial losses. Mass fear of COVID-19, termed as “coronaphobia”, has generated a plethora of psychiatric manifestations across the different strata of the society. So, this review has been undertaken to define psychosocial impact of COVID-19. Methods Pubmed and GoogleScholar are searched with the following key terms- “COVID-19”, “SARS-CoV2”, “Pandemic”, “Psychology”, “Psychosocial”, “Psychitry”, “marginalized”, “telemedicine”, “mental health”, “quarantine”, “infodemic”, “social media” and” “internet”. Few news paper reports related to COVID-19 and psychosocial impacts have also been added as per context. Results Disease itself multitude by forced quarantine to combat COVID-19 applied by nationwide lockdowns can produce acute panic, anxiety, obsessive behaviors, hoarding, paranoia, and depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the long run. These have been fueled by an “infodemic” spread via different platforms social media. Outbursts of racism, stigmatization, and xenophobia against particular communities are also being widely reported. Nevertheless, frontline healthcare workers are at higher-risk of contracting the disease as well as experiencing adverse psychological outcomes in form of burnout, anxiety, fear of transmitting infection, feeling of incompatibility, depression, increased substance-dependence, and PTSD. Community-based mitigation programs to combat COVID-19 will disrupt children's usual lifestyle and may cause florid mental distress. The psychosocial aspects of older people, their caregivers, psychiatric patients and marginalized communities are affected by this pandemic in different ways and need special attention. Conclusion For better dealing with these psychosocial issues of different strata of the society, psychosocial crisis prevention and intervention models should be urgently developed by the government, health care personnel and other stakeholders. Apt application of internet services, technology and social media to curb both pandemic and infodemic needs to be instigated. Psychosocial preparedness by setting up mental organizations specific for future pandemics is certainly necessary.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health.

              The Commission on Social Determinants of Health, created to marshal the evidence on what can be done to promote health equity and to foster a global movement to achieve it, is a global collaboration of policy makers, researchers, and civil society, led by commissioners with a unique blend of political, academic, and advocacy experience. The focus of attention is on countries at all levels of income and development. The commission launched its final report on August 28, 2008. This paper summarises the key findings and recommendations; the full list is in the final report.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Glob Health
                BMJ Glob Health
                bmjgh
                bmjgh
                BMJ Global Health
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2059-7908
                2021
                29 April 2021
                : 6
                : 4
                : e004959
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentSchool of Geography and the Environment , University of Oxford , Oxford, UK
                [2 ]Institute of Applied Economic Research , Brasília, Brazil
                [3 ]departmentDepartment of Electronic Systems Engineering , University of São Paulo , São Paulo, Brazil
                [4 ]departmentDepartment of Zoology , University of Oxford , Oxford, UK
                [5 ]departmentDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Institute of Mathematics and Statistics , University of São Paulo , São Paulo, Brazil
                [6 ]departmentOxford School of Global and Area Studies, Latin American Centre , University of Oxford , Oxford, UK
                [7 ]departmentVirology Research Center, Ribeirão Preto Medical School , University of São Paulo , Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
                [8 ]departmentInstitute of Social and Political Studies (IESP) , State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) , Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                [9 ]departmentDepartamento de Molestias Infecciosas e Parasitarias andInstituto de Medicina Tropical , Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo , São Paulo, Brazil
                [10 ]Fundação Pró-Sangue Hemocentro de São Paulo , São Paulo, Brazil
                [11 ]departmentDisciplina de Ciências Médicas , Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo , São Paulo, Brazil
                [12 ]departmentLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco – Immuno – Hematology (LIM-31) HCFMUSP , University of São Paulo Medical School , São Paulo, Brazil
                [13 ]departmentHospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo , University of São Paulo , São Paulo, Brazil
                [14 ]departmentMathematical Sciences , University of Southampton , Southampton, UK
                [15 ]departmentDepartment of Preventive Medicine , University of São Paulo Medical School , São Paulo, Brazil
                [16 ]departmentMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis; and the Abdul Latif Jameel Institute for Disease and Emergency Analytics (J-IDEA), School of Public Health , Imperial College London , London, UK
                [17 ]departmentOxford School of Global and Area Studies , University of Oxford , Oxford, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Sabrina L Li; lisabrinaly@ 123456gmail.com ; Dr Rafael H M Pereira; rafael.pereira@ 123456ipea.gov.br
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1183-126X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2125-7465
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3907-423X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1824-7653
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3754-5755
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9340-030X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2358-3221
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6104-7297
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3585-8683
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0025-8293
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6796-4547
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9009-9301
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3090-4575
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8490-4634
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4190-0238
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7580-4597
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2914-6535
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9386-725X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0625-0265
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0543-4735
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2623-5126
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9747-8822
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7829-1272
                Article
                bmjgh-2021-004959
                10.1136/bmjgh-2021-004959
                8094342
                33926892
                51f7f867-0595-4f36-842d-3cff6e3fb3a5
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 06 January 2021
                : 08 March 2021
                : 06 April 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265, Medical Research Council;
                Award ID: MR/S0195/1
                Funded by: São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP);
                Award ID: FAPESP 18/14389-0
                Categories
                Original Research
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                geographic information systems,epidemiology,public health,cross-sectional survey,mathematical modelling

                Comments

                Comment on this article