1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Preventing Cardiac Arrest in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Through Multicenter Collaboration

      1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 4 , 6 , 1 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 2 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 7 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 19 , 13 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 1 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , 29 , PC4 CAP Collaborators
      JAMA Pediatrics
      American Medical Association (AMA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process

          Since the publication of Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this manuscript, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) semistructured interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) two face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasises the reporting of three key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value and safety of healthcare: the use of formal and informal theory in planning, implementing and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve healthcare, recognising that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (http://www.squire-statement.org).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Incidence of treated cardiac arrest in hospitalized patients in the United States.

              The incidence and incidence over time of cardiac arrest in hospitalized patients is unknown. We sought to estimate the event rate and temporal trends of adult inhospital cardiac arrest treated with a resuscitation response. Three approaches were used to estimate the inhospital cardiac arrest event rate. First approach: calculate the inhospital cardiac arrest event rate at hospitals (n = 433) in the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry, years 2003-2007, and multiply this by U.S. annual bed days. Second approach: use the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation inhospital cardiac arrest event rate to develop a regression model (including hospital demographic, geographic, and organizational factors), and use the model coefficients to calculate predicted event rates for acute care hospitals (n = 5445) responding to the American Hospital Association survey. Third approach: classify acute care hospitals into groups based on academic, urban, and bed size characteristics, and determine the average event rate for Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation hospitals in each group, and use weighted averages to calculate the national inhospital cardiac arrest rate. Annual event rates were calculated to estimate temporal trends. Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry. Adult inhospital cardiac arrest with a resuscitation response. The mean adult treated inhospital cardiac arrest event rate at Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation hospitals was 0.92/1000 bed days (interquartile range 0.58 to 1.2/1000). In hospitals (n = 150) contributing data for all years of the study period, the event rate increased from 2003 to 2007. With 2.09 million annual U.S. bed days, we estimated 192,000 inhospital cardiac arrests throughout the United States annually. Based on the regression model, extrapolating Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation hospitals to hospitals participating in the American Hospital Association survey projected 211,000 annual inhospital cardiac arrests. Using weighted averages projected 209,000 annual U.S. inhospital cardiac arrests. There are approximately 200,000 treated cardiac arrests among U.S. hospitalized patients annually, and this rate may be increasing. This is important for understanding the burden of inhospital cardiac arrest and developing strategies to improve care for hospitalized patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Pediatrics
                JAMA Pediatr
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                2168-6203
                July 05 2022
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
                [2 ]Division of Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC
                [3 ]Division of Anesthesia, Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Children’s Center, Baltimore, Maryland
                [4 ]Department of Pediatrics, Cardiac Critical Care, Medical City Children’s Hospital, Dallas, Texas
                [5 ]James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
                [6 ]Department of Pediatrics, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
                [7 ]Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, Ann Arbor
                [8 ]Department of Pediatrics, Heart Institute, University of Tennessee, Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital, Memphis
                [9 ]Department of Pediatrics, Critical Care Medicine, University of Missouri, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City
                [10 ]Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas at Austin-Dell Medical School, Dell Children’s Medical Center of Central Texas, Austin
                [11 ]Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Primary Children’s Hospital, Salt Lake City
                [12 ]Department of Pediatric Critical Care, Medical College of Wisconsin, Children’s Wisconsin, Milwaukee
                [13 ]Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Cardiac Critical Care, Birmingham
                [14 ]Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
                [15 ]Department of Pediatrics and Critical Care Medicine, Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                [16 ]Division of Cardiovascular Intensive Care, Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Phoenix Arizona
                [17 ]Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care, University of California San Francisco, Benioff Children’s Hospital, San Francisco
                [18 ]Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care, University of Washington, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle
                [19 ]Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego
                [20 ]Department of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Children’s Hospital and Medical Center, Omaha
                [21 ]Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Little Rock
                [22 ]Division of Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, Nicklaus Children’s Hospital, Miami, Florida
                [23 ]Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
                [24 ]Department of Pediatrics, Heart Institute, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora
                [25 ]Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
                [26 ]Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
                [27 ]Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
                [28 ]Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
                [29 ]for the PC4 CAP Collaborators
                Article
                10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.2238
                35788631
                51cbd8f9-7cdb-4b5c-8de7-3a26167842a8
                © 2022
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article