45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Challenges and opportunities in examining and addressing intersectional stigma and health

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          ‘Intersectional stigma’ is a concept that has emerged to characterize the convergence of multiple stigmatized identities within a person or group, and to address their joint effects on health and wellbeing. While enquiry into the intersections of race, class, and gender serves as the historical and theoretical basis for intersectional stigma, there is little consensus on how best to characterize and analyze intersectional stigma, or on how to design interventions to address this complex phenomenon. The purpose of this paper is to highlight existing intersectional stigma literature, identify gaps in our methods for studying and addressing intersectional stigma, provide examples illustrating promising analytical approaches, and elucidate priorities for future health research.

          Discussion

          Evidence from the existing scientific literature, as well as the examples presented here, suggest that people in diverse settings experience intersecting forms of stigma that influence their mental and physical health and corresponding health behaviors. As different stigmas are often correlated and interrelated, the health impact of intersectional stigma is complex, generating a broad range of vulnerabilities and risks. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches are required to reduce the significant knowledge gaps that remain in our understanding of intersectional stigma, shared identity, and their effects on health.

          Conclusions

          Stigmatized identities, while often analyzed in isolation, do not exist in a vacuum. Intersecting forms of stigma are a common reality, yet they remain poorly understood. The development of instruments and methods to better characterize the mechanisms and effects of intersectional stigma in relation to various health conditions around the globe is vital. Only then will healthcare providers, public health officials, and advocates be able to design health interventions that capitalize on the positive aspects of shared identity, while reducing the burden of stigma.

          Related collections

          Most cited references109

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener.

          A number of self-administered questionnaires are available for assessing depression severity, including the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire depression module (PHQ-9). Because even briefer measures might be desirable for use in busy clinical settings or as part of comprehensive health questionnaires, we evaluated a 2-item version of the PHQ depression module, the PHQ-2. The PHQ-2 inquires about the frequency of depressed mood and anhedonia over the past 2 weeks, scoring each as 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). The PHQ-2 was completed by 6000 patients in 8 primary care clinics and 7 obstetrics-gynecology clinics. Construct validity was assessed using the 20-item Short-Form General Health Survey, self-reported sick days and clinic visits, and symptom-related difficulty. Criterion validity was assessed against an independent structured mental health professional (MHP) interview in a sample of 580 patients. As PHQ-2 depression severity increased from 0 to 6, there was a substantial decrease in functional status on all 6 SF-20 subscales. Also, symptom-related difficulty, sick days, and healthcare utilization increased. Using the MHP reinterview as the criterion standard, a PHQ-2 score > or =3 had a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 92% for major depression. Likelihood ratio and receiver operator characteristic analysis identified a PHQ-2 score of 3 as the optimal cutpoint for screening purposes. Results were similar in the primary care and obstetrics-gynecology samples. The construct and criterion validity of the PHQ-2 make it an attractive measure for depression screening.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Racial Differences in Physical and Mental Health: Socio-economic Status, Stress and Discrimination.

            This article examines the extent to which racial differences in socio-economic status (SES), social class and acute and chronic indicators of perceived discrimination, as well as general measures of stress can account for black-white differences in self-reported measures of physical and mental health. The observed racial differences in health were markedly reduced when adjusted for education and especially income. However, both perceived discrimination and more traditional measures of stress are related to health and play an incremental role in accounting for differences between the races in health status. These findings underscore the need for research efforts to identify the complex ways in which economic and non-economic forms of discrimination relate to each other and combine with socio-economic position and other risk factors and resources to affect health.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Social Conditions As Fundamental Causes of Disease

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jmturan@uab.edu
                melafro1@jhmi.edu
                carmen.logie@utoronto.ca
                sbanik@bw.edu
                bturanb@uab.edu
                kburnham@uab.edu
                pescosol@indiana.edu
                sarah.murray@jhu.edu
                Journal
                BMC Med
                BMC Med
                BMC Medicine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1741-7015
                15 February 2019
                15 February 2019
                2019
                : 17
                : 7
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000106344187, GRID grid.265892.2, Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, School of Public Health, , University of Alabama at Birmingham, ; 1665 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2192 2723, GRID grid.411935.b, Department of Neurology, , Johns Hopkins Hospital, ; Baltimore, MD USA
                [3 ]Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, Toronto, ON Canada
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0474 0188, GRID grid.417199.3, Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, ; Toronto, ON Canada
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1261 1616, GRID grid.252749.f, Department of Public Health & Prevention Sciences, , Baldwin Wallace University, ; Berea, OH USA
                [6 ]ISNI 0000000106344187, GRID grid.265892.2, Department of Psychology, , University of Alabama at Birmingham, ; Birmingham, AL USA
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0790 959X, GRID grid.411377.7, Department of Sociology, , Indiana University, ; Bloomington, IN USA
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2171 9311, GRID grid.21107.35, Department of Mental Health, , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, ; Baltimore, MD USA
                Article
                1246
                10.1186/s12916-018-1246-9
                6376691
                30764816
                4f2364fe-280e-43c0-9f86-d6415a90f6c2
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 26 May 2018
                : 19 December 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: R01 TW006374
                Award ID: 1R21 DA033719
                Award ID: P30 AI027767
                Award ID: P30 AI027767
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001411, Indian Council of Medical Research;
                Funded by: UAB Center for AIDS Research
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000025, National Institute of Mental Health;
                Award ID: R01MH104114
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Institute of Mental Health
                Award ID: R01MH104114
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Ontario Ministry of Research & Innovation Early Researcher Award
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000133, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality;
                Award ID: T32HS013852
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Correspondence
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Medicine
                layered stigma,double stigma,multiple stigma,overlapping stigma,discrimination,prejudice,measurement,intersectional

                Comments

                Comment on this article