3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Regional Variability in Percentage of Breast Cancers Reported as Positive for HER2 in California : Implications of Patient Demographics on Laboratory Benchmarks

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          The expected regional variability in percent human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive breast cancers is not currently clear.

          Methods

          Data from the 2006 to 2011 California Cancer Registry were examined by county and health service area. The influence of demographic and pathologic features was used in a multivariable logistic regression model to compare expected with observed HER2-positive percentages by region.

          Results

          There was significant geographic variation by California counties (11.6%-26%). The reported HER2-positive percentage was higher when the population had higher stage, tumor size, grade, percent estrogen receptor negative, younger age, or lower socioeconomic status. Ethnic distribution of the population also influenced HER2-positive percentages. Using a multivariable logistic regression model, most regions had expected values based on their population characteristics; however, “outlier” regions were identified.

          Conclusions

          These results deepen our understanding of population characteristics’ influence on the distribution of HER2-positive breast cancers. Taking these factors into account can be useful when setting laboratory benchmarks and assessing test quality.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Am J Clin Pathol
          Am. J. Clin. Pathol
          ajcpath
          American Journal of Clinical Pathology
          Oxford University Press (US )
          0002-9173
          1943-7722
          September 2017
          10 August 2017
          01 September 2018
          : 148
          : 3
          : 199-207
          Affiliations
          [1 ] From the Department of Pathology and
          [2 ] Departments of Medicine and Health Research & Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, CA;
          [3 ] Cancer Prevention Institute of California , Fremont, CA;
          [4 ] Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA ; and
          [5 ] VA Palo Alto Health Care System , Palo Alto, CA.
          Author notes

          Corresponding author: Kimberly H. Allison, MD, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Lane 235, Stanford, CA 94305-5324; allisonk@ 123456stanford.edu .

          Article
          PMC5848426 PMC5848426 5848426 aqx063
          10.1093/ajcp/aqx063
          5848426
          28821197
          4972ce8f-8321-4d2a-8813-5f2a1b74dcc3
          © American Society for Clinical Pathology, 2017. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com
          History
          Page count
          Pages: 9
          Funding
          Funded by: National Cancer Institute 10.13039/100000054
          Award ID: HHSN261201000140C
          Funded by: University of Southern California 10.13039/100006034
          Award ID: HHSN261201000034C
          Funded by: Public Health Institute 10.13039/100001808
          Funded by: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 10.13039/100000030
          Award ID: U58DP003862-01
          Categories
          Original Articles
          Featured

          Breast cancer,Positivity rate,Quality,Benchmark,Variability,HER2

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Cited by5