There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
<div class="section">
<a class="named-anchor" id="S1">
<!--
named anchor
-->
</a>
<h5 class="section-title" id="d4590584e168">Background:</h5>
<p id="P1">Policy-makers argue that emergency department (ED) visits for conditions
preventable
with high-quality outpatient care contribute to waste in the healthcare system. However,
access to ambulatory care is uneven, especially for vulnerable populations like minorities,
the poor and those with limited health literacy. The impact of limited health literacy
on ED visits that are preventable with timely, high-quality ambulatory care is unknown.
</p>
</div><div class="section">
<a class="named-anchor" id="S2">
<!--
named anchor
-->
</a>
<h5 class="section-title" id="d4590584e173">Objective:</h5>
<p id="P2">To determine the association of health literacy and preventable ED visits.</p>
</div><div class="section">
<a class="named-anchor" id="S3">
<!--
named anchor
-->
</a>
<h5 class="section-title" id="d4590584e178">Methods:</h5>
<p id="P3">We conducted an observational cross-sectional study of potentially preventable
ED
visits (outcome) among adults (≥18 years old) in an ED serving an urban community.
We assessed health literacy (predictor) through structured interviews with the Rapid
Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM). We recorded age, sex, race, employment,
payer, marital and health status, and number of comorbidities through structured interviews
or electronic ord review. We identified potentially preventable ED visits in the two
years prior to the index ED visit by applying Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
technical specifications to identify ambulatory care sensitive conditions using ED
discharge diagnoses in hospital administrative data. We used Poisson regression to
evaluate the number of preventable ED visits among patients with limited (REALM <
61), versus adequate (REALM ≥ 61), health literacy after adjusting for covariates.
</p>
</div><div class="section">
<a class="named-anchor" id="S4">
<!--
named anchor
-->
</a>
<h5 class="section-title" id="d4590584e183">Results:</h5>
<p id="P4">Of 1,201 participants, 709 (59%) were female, 370 (31%) were African American,
mean
age was 41.6 years, and 394 (33%) had limited health literacy. Out of 4,444 total
ED its, 423 (9.5%) were potentially preventable. Of these, 260 (61%) resulted in hospital
admission and 163 (39%) were treat-and-release. After adjusting for covariates, patients
with limited literacy had 2.3 (95% CI 1.7–3.1) times the number of potentially preventable
ED visits resulting in hospital admission compared to individuals with adequate health
literacy, 1.4 (95%CI 1.0–2.0) times the number of treat-and-release visits, and 1.9
(95% CI 1.5–2.4) times the number of total preventable ED visits.
</p>
</div><div class="section">
<a class="named-anchor" id="S5">
<!--
named anchor
-->
</a>
<h5 class="section-title" id="d4590584e188">Conclusions:</h5>
<p id="P5">Our results suggest that the ED may be an important site to deploy universal
literacy-sensitive
precautions and to test literacy-sensitive interventions with the goal of reducing
the burden of potentially preventable ED visits on patients and the healthcare system.
</p>
</div>
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recently called for action on health literacy. An important first step is defining the current state of the literature about interventions designed to mitigate the effects of low health literacy. We performed an updated systematic review examining the effects of interventions that authors reported were specifically designed to mitigate the effects of low health literacy. We searched MEDLINE®, The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), and the Cochrane Library databases (2003 forward for health literacy; 1966 forward for numeracy). Two reviewers independently reviewed titles, abstracts, and full-text articles for inclusion and included studies that examined outcomes by health literacy level and met other pre-specified criteria. One reviewer abstracted article information into evidence tables; a second checked accuracy. Two reviewers independently rated study quality using predefined criteria. Among 38 included studies, we found multiple discrete design features that improved comprehension in one or a few studies (e.g., presenting essential information by itself or first, presenting information so that the higher number is better, adding icon arrays to numerical information, adding video to verbal narratives). In a few studies, we also found consistent, direct, fair or good-quality evidence that intensive self-management interventions reduced emergency department visits and hospitalizations; and intensive self- and disease-management interventions reduced disease severity. Evidence for the effects of interventions on other outcomes was either limited or mixed. Multiple interventions show promise for mitigating the effects of low health literacy and could be considered for use in clinical practice.
This study examined the relationship of functional health literacy to self-reported health and use of health services. Patients presenting to two large, urban public hospitals in Atlanta, Ga, and Torrance, Calif, were administered a health literacy test about their overall health and use of health care services during the 3 months preceding their visit. Patients with inadequate functional health literacy were more likely than patients with adequate literacy to report their health as poor. Number of years of school completed was less strongly associated with self-reported health. Literacy was not related to regular source of care or physician visits, but patients in Atlanta with inadequate literacy were more likely than patients with adequate literacy to report a hospitalization in the previous year. Low literacy is strongly associated with self-reported poor health and is more closely associated with self-reported health than number of years of school completed.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.