24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What is the impact on health and wellbeing of interventions that foster respect and social inclusion in community-residing older adults? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Many interventions have been developed to promote respect and social inclusion among older people, but the evidence on their impacts on health has not been synthesised. This systematic review aims to appraise the state of the evidence across the quantitative and qualitative literature.

          Methods

          Eligible studies published between 1990 and 2015 were identified by scanning seven bibliographic databases using a pre-piloted strategy, searching grey literature and contacting experts. Studies were included if they assessed the impact (quantitatively) and/or perceived impact (qualitatively) of an intervention promoting respect and social inclusion on the physical or mental health of community-residing people aged 60 years and older. Titles and abstracts were screened for eligibility by one reviewer. A second reviewer independently screened a 10% random sample. Full texts were screened for eligibility by one reviewer, with verification by another reviewer. Risk of bias was assessed using standardised tools. Findings were summarised using narrative synthesis, harvest plots and logic models to depict the potential pathways to health outcomes.

          Results

          Of the 27,354 records retrieved, 40 studies (23 quantitative, 6 qualitative, 11 mixed methods) were included. All studies were conducted in high and upper middle-income countries. Interventions involved mentoring, intergenerational and multi-activity programmes, dancing, music and singing, art and culture and information-communication technology. Most studies ( n = 24) were at high or moderate risk of bias. Music and singing, intergenerational interventions, art and culture and multi-activity interventions were associated with an overall positive impact on health outcomes. This included depression ( n = 3), wellbeing ( n = 3), subjective health ( n = 2), quality of life ( n = 2), perceived stress and mental health ( n = 2) and physical health ( n = 2). Qualitative studies offered explanations for mediating factors (e.g. improved self-esteem) that may lead to improved health outcomes and contributed to the assessment of causation.

          Conclusions

          Whilst this review suggests that some interventions may positively impact on the health outcomes of older people, and identified mediating factors to health outcomes, the evidence is based on studies with heterogeneous methodologies. Many of the interventions were delivered as projects to selected groups, raising important questions about the feasibility of wider implementation and the potential for population-wide benefits.

          Systematic review registration

          PROSPERO registration number CRD42014010107

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-018-0680-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references125

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

            David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance

              Evaluating complex interventions is complicated. The Medical Research Council's evaluation framework (2000) brought welcome clarity to the task. Now the council has updated its guidance
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +44 (0) 151 795 0132 , ronzis@liverpool.ac.uk
                L.C.Orton@liverpool.ac.uk
                Danpope@liverpool.ac.uk
                nicole.valtorta@newcastle.ac.uk
                Ngb@liverpool.ac.uk
                Journal
                Syst Rev
                Syst Rev
                Systematic Reviews
                BioMed Central (London )
                2046-4053
                30 January 2018
                30 January 2018
                2018
                : 7
                : 26
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8470, GRID grid.10025.36, Department of Public Health and Policy, , University of Liverpool, ; Liverpool, UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0462 7212, GRID grid.1006.7, Institute for Ageing, , Newcastle University, ; Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6089-9586
                Article
                680
                10.1186/s13643-018-0680-2
                5789687
                29382375
                480ef3f9-6f44-4bb4-b463-305f18ee7302
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 4 June 2017
                : 12 January 2018
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Public health
                social inclusion,older people,ageing,systematic review,health impact,age-friendly environments

                Comments

                Comment on this article