40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The functional importance of human foot muscles for bipedal locomotion

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Human feet have evolved uniquely among primates, losing an opposable first digit in favor of a pronounced arch to enhance our ability to walk and run with an upright posture. Recent work suggests that muscles within our feet are key to how the foot functions during bipedal walking and running. Here we show direct evidence for the significance of these foot muscles in supporting the mechanical performance of the human foot. Contrary to expectations, the intrinsic foot muscles contribute minimally to supporting the arch of the foot during walking and running. However, these muscles do influence our ability to produce forward propulsion from one stride into the next, highlighting their role in bipedal locomotion.

          Abstract

          Human feet have evolved to facilitate bipedal locomotion, losing an opposable digit that grasped branches in favor of a longitudinal arch (LA) that stiffens the foot and aids bipedal gait. Passive elastic structures are credited with supporting the LA, but recent evidence suggests that plantar intrinsic muscles (PIMs) within the foot actively contribute to foot stiffness. To test the functional significance of the PIMs, we compared foot and lower limb mechanics with and without a tibial nerve block that prevented contraction of these muscles. Comparisons were made during controlled limb loading, walking, and running in healthy humans. An inability to activate the PIMs caused slightly greater compression of the LA when controlled loads were applied to the lower limb by a linear actuator. However, when greater loads were experienced during ground contact in walking and running, the stiffness of the LA was not altered by the block, indicating that the PIMs’ contribution to LA stiffness is minimal, probably because of their small size. With the PIMs blocked, the distal joints of the foot could not be stiffened sufficiently to provide normal push-off against the ground during late stance. This led to an increase in stride rate and compensatory power generated by the hip musculature, but no increase in the metabolic cost of transport. The results reveal that the PIMs have a minimal effect on the stiffness of the LA when absorbing high loads, but help stiffen the distal foot to aid push-off against the ground when walking or running bipedally.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The spring in the arch of the human foot.

          Large mammals, including humans, save much of the energy needed for running by means of elastic structures in their legs and feet. Kinetic and potential energy removed from the body in the first half of the stance phase is stored briefly as elastic strain energy and then returned in the second half by elastic recoil. Thus the animal runs in an analogous fashion to a rubber ball bouncing along. Among the elastic structures involved, the tendons of distal leg muscles have been shown to be important. Here we show that the elastic properties of the arch of the human foot are also important.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Energetic consequences of walking like an inverted pendulum: step-to-step transitions.

            Walking like an inverted pendulum reduces muscle-force and work demands during single support, but it also unavoidably requires mechanical work to redirect the body's center of mass in the transition between steps, when one pendular motion is substituted by the next. Production of this work exacts a proportional metabolic cost that is a major determinant of the overall cost of walking.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Derivation of formulae used to calculate energy expenditure in man.

              W Brockway (1987)
              The origins of the data used to construct some of the formulae in current usage for the calculation of energy expenditure are discussed. The differences in expenditure calculated by the various formulae cover a range of about 3 per cent. This error is large in relation to long-term studies of energy balance, and to the accuracy attainable with modern respiration chambers. The differences stem in part from the use of inappropriate original values and in part from errors in arithmetic. A new set of source data and a derived formula are presented.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                29 January 2019
                17 January 2019
                17 January 2019
                : 116
                : 5
                : 1645-1650
                Affiliations
                [1] aSport & Health Sciences, College of Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter , St Luke’s Campus, EX1 2LU Exeter, United Kingdom;
                [2] bSchool of Human Movement & Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: d.farris@ 123456exeter.ac.uk .

                Edited by Bruce Latimer, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, and accepted by Editorial Board Member C. O. Lovejoy December 13, 2018 (received for review July 25, 2018)

                Author contributions: D.J.F., L.A.K., A.G.C., and G.A.L. designed research; D.J.F. and L.A.K. performed research; D.J.F., L.A.K., and G.A.L. analyzed data; and D.J.F., L.A.K., A.G.C., and G.A.L. wrote the paper.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6720-1961
                Article
                201812820
                10.1073/pnas.1812820116
                6358692
                30655349
                47bd2934-c827-467e-a754-836af691921d
                Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 6
                Funding
                Funded by: Australian Research Council (ARC) 501100000923
                Award ID: DP160101117
                Award Recipient : Dominic James Farris Award Recipient : Luke A Kelly Award Recipient : Andrew Graham Cresswell Award Recipient : Glen Anthony Lichtwark
                Funded by: Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 501100000925
                Award ID: 1111909
                Award Recipient : Luke A Kelly
                Categories
                Biological Sciences
                Evolution

                gait,intrinsic foot muscles,biomechanics,longitudinal arch,bipedal locomotion

                Comments

                Comment on this article