6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Early Homo, plasticity and the extended evolutionary synthesis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Modern Synthesis led to fundamental advances in understandings of human evolution. For human palaeontology, a science that works from ancestral phenotypes (i.e. the fossil record), particularly important have been perspectives used to help understand the heritable aspects of phenotypes and how fossil individuals might then be aggregated into species, and relationships among these groups understood. This focus, coupled with the fragmentary nature of the fossil record, however, means that individual phenotypic variation is often treated as unimportant ‘noise’, rather than as a source of insight into population adaptation and evolutionary process. The emphasis of the extended evolutionary synthesis on plasticity as a source of phenotypic novelty, and the related question of the role of such variation in long-term evolutionary trends, focuses welcome attention on non-genetic means by which novel phenotypes are generated and in so doing provides alternative approaches to interpreting the fossil record. We review evidence from contemporary human populations regarding some of the aspects of adult phenotypes preserved in the fossil record that might be most responsive to non-genetic drivers, and we consider how these perspectives lead to alternate hypotheses for interpreting the fossil record of early genus Homo. We conclude by arguing that paying closer attention to the causes and consequences of intraspecific phenotypic variation in its own right, as opposed to as noise around a species mean, may inspire a new generation of hypotheses regarding species diversity in the Early Pleistocene and the foundations for dispersal and regional diversification in Homo erectus and its descendants .

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Interface Focus
          Interface Focus
          RSFS
          royfocus
          Interface Focus
          The Royal Society
          2042-8898
          2042-8901
          6 October 2017
          18 August 2017
          : 7
          : 5 , Theme issue ‘New trends in evolutionary biology: biological, philosophical and social science perspectives’ organized by Denis Noble, Nancy Cartwright, Patrick Bateson, John Dupré and Kevin Laland
          : 20170004
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Anthropology, New York University , 25 Waverly Place, New York, NY 10003, USA
          [2 ] Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University , 1810 Hinman Avenue, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
          Author notes
          Author information
          http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2253-6650
          Article
          PMC5566814 PMC5566814 5566814 rsfs20170004
          10.1098/rsfs.2017.0004
          5566814
          28839926
          47629779-b24a-4fb5-a0d2-213854864ae5
          © 2017 The Author(s)

          Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

          History
          Categories
          1004
          179
          20
          Articles
          Review Article
          Custom metadata
          October 6, 2017

          human biology,developmental plasticity,speciation, Homo erectus ,phenotypic variation

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content64

          Cited by14