10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Complement activation kindles the transition of acute post-traumatic brain injury to a chronic inflammatory disease

      other
      , , MD, PhD *
      Neural Regeneration Research
      Wolters Kluwer - Medknow

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a major cause of disability among young adults in both civilian and military settings contributing to a high burden on healthcare systems (Badhiwala et al., 2019). Sequel of TBI, even mild injuries, include motor and sensory dysfunction, neurocognitive decline, neuropsychiatric complications, as well as increased risk of neurodegenerative and neurovascular events such as Alzheimer’s disease and stroke (Breunig et al., 2013; Burke et al., 2013; Li et al., 2017). Despite the acute nature of the insult in TBI, pathological changes in the traumatized brain are better recognized as a chronic rather than an acute neurological disease, a phenomenon that remains under-investigated. Robust clinical data support the role of neuroinflammation in propagating neurodegenerative changes following TBI with a pivotal role of the complement system as an early trigger and chronic propagator of this response (Alawieh et al., 2018, 2021; Mallah et al., 2021). Hereby, we discuss how the role of complement pathways in different phases of injury after TBI was investigated using clinically relevant targeted complement inhibitors (Alawieh and Tomlinson, 2016; Alawieh et al., 2018, 2021; Mallah et al., 2021). The complement system is a component of the innate and adaptive immune response that can be activated via one of three different pathways: the classical, lectin or alternative pathway. The classical pathway is usually initiated by the binding of C1q to antibody Fc domains. The lectin pathway is initiated by the binding of mannose-binding lectin to certain carbohydrates, including those present on natural antibodies. The alternative pathway can be spontaneously activated, and serves as an amplification loop for the other pathways. All pathways converge with the cleavage of C3 to produce C3a and C3b. C3a is a soluble inflammatory peptide and C3b is covalently bound to the activating surface. C3b is further cleaved to yield membrane-bound iC3b and C3d, opsonins that are recognized by receptors (such as C receptor 2 and 3, CR2 and CR3) on immune cells. C3 cleavage also leads to downstream C5 cleavage to yield C5a and C5b. C5a has inflammatory activities, whereas C5b initiates the terminal pathway and formation of the membrane attack complex that can cause direct cell lysis. Complement is regulated by various fluid phases and membrane-bound inhibitors. Of relevance, our group has developed injury-site targeted inhibitors of complement activation that home to the site of complement activation and inhibit different steps in the activation cascade. Several generations of these inhibitors have been reviewed elsewhere (Alawieh and Tomlinson, 2016), and they include Complement Receptor 2 (CR2)-targeted inhibitors. These are fusion proteins of CR2 that bind complement activation products C3b/iC3b/C3d which are covalently deposited on sites of active inflammation, and one of three complement inhibitors; namely, Crry (inhibits C3 cleavage by all pathways), factor H (fH, inhibits the alternative pathway) and CD59 (inhibits the membrane attack complex). These inhibitors constitute a clinical investigation toolbox to probe the role of different complement activation products in complement-dependent pathologies. Our group among others has investigated the contribution of complement system activation to TBI pathology, and these studies have implicated all three pathways of complement activation (Ruseva et al., 2015; Alawieh et al., 2018, 2021; Mallah et al., 2021). Early work has focused on targeting the membrane attack complex demonstrating increased levels of the C5b-9 complex in the CSF of TBI patients and improved acute outcomes with inhibition of this pathway in preclinical models (Bellander et al., 2001; Stahel et al., 2001; Ruseva et al., 2015). However, subsequent study by our group took advantage of the repertoire of injury-site targeted inhibitors against the different complement pathways to probe the differential role of each pathway in TBI pathology (Alawieh et al., 2018). These inhibitors included CR2-Crry (inhibits C3 cleavage by all pathways), CR2-fH (inhibits the alternative pathway), and CR2-CD59 (inhibits the membrane attack complex). After acute administration of complement inhibitors in murine TBI, this work demonstrated that although acute outcomes were comparable and better than controls when either of the inhibitors was used, chronic outcomes were dependent specifically on suppression of C3 activation rather than membrane attack complex. Inhibition of the membrane attack complex alone (via CR2-CD59) reduced acute neuronal cell loss, but did not suppress the release of upstream complement activation products including C3b and C3a, both of which are potent activators of systemic and local inflammatory cells. This early activation of the C3 convertase resulted in an ongoing neuroinflammatory response characterized by astrogliosis and microgliosis up to 30 days after the initial insult. Only the inhibition of the C3 convertase or the alternative pathway (via CR2-Crry and CR2-fH respectively) was sufficient to suppress the ongoing neuroinflammatory response by 30 days and limit neurocognitive decline (Alawieh et al., 2018). Following these studies, the question remains whether the role of complement in driving neuroinflammation is restricted only to the acute phase of injury following TBI. Histological data show that, even up to 90 days post-TBI, complement activation products were still deposited in the injured brain and associated with ongoing microglial proliferation and neuronal loss (Alawieh et al., 2018, 2021). This led to subsequent long-term studies in mice where complement C3 activation was inhibited via the targeted inhibitor CR2-Crry starting at 2 months after the onset of TBI. At the time of initiation of treatment, animals of the treatment and control cohorts have already sustained significant cognitive deficits as compared to their naïve controls and showed similar patterns of complement activation. However, when CR2-Crry was administered as three doses over 1 week starting 8 weeks after the initial insult, these cognitive deficits were reversed showing that, even in a delayed fashion, inhibition of pathologic C3 activation can allow for reversal of cognitive decline incurred after TBI. At the same time, the dynamic nature of this response at the delayed timepoint further supports the nature of TBI pathology as a chronic rather than an acute neuroinflammatory disease (Alawieh et al., 2021). In the same work, the introduction of rehabilitation resulted in an additive effect to complement inhibition, a mechanism based on the neuroplastic response that could still be exploited in chronically injured brains. In fact, using super-resolution microscopy, our group demonstrated that this chronic complement activity in the injured brain was responsible for complement-dependent phagocytosis of synaptic connections in the hippocampus, a process that is directly correlated with cognitive performance in tested animals (Alawieh et al., 2021). Loss of synaptic density is an early process in neurodegeneration and results in limited trophic supports for recovering neurons, and reduces the neuronal substrate that is able to engage in neuroplastic and neuro-regenerative mechanisms. These studies show that complement is not only a trigger for the neuroinflammatory response after acute TBI but also continues to kindle the neuroinflammatory response later in the phases of injury limiting neurocognitive recovery. Complement-driven neuroinflammation poses a significant brake on the neurodegenerative response in the recovering brain as characterized by limited neurogenesis in the subventricular zone, decrease dendritic and synaptic arborization, and chronic loss of neurons in the brain with robust complement activity following injury (Alawieh et al., 2018, 2021; Mallah et al., 2021). Supporting this hypothesis, follow-up work from our group assessed whether continuous suppression of complement activity in murine TBI was required to prevent the reinstatement of cognitive deficits over 6 months of recovery compared to transient short-term inhibition. In mice treated with complement inhibitor (CR2-Crry) over a single week 2 months after injury, cognitive deficits recurred by 6 months of recovery whereas mice receiving weekly dosing of complement inhibitor maintained cognitive performance comparable to naïve mice on spatial learning and memory tasks. Collectively, these studies take a unique advantage of the clinically relevant targeted complement inhibitors that allow for local suppression of complement activation at different stages of TBI pathology. Compared to genetic knockout models that do not allow for a temporal investigation of this role, the use of these inhibitors has demonstrated that the C3 activation step is a pivotal event in triggering the neuroinflammatory response after TBI, and that this trigger is an ongoing phenomenon that keeps propagating the inflammatory response in the chronic phases of injury unless therapeutically inhibited. In addition to providing new insight into TBI pathology, these targeted approaches for complement modulation open a new avenue for potential new therapeutics for the treatment of the large population of TBI patients. Notably, these inhibitors, among other targeted complement inhibitors, are currently in different stages of clinical development, and the humanized version of CR2-fH (namely TT30) has been found to be safe in a phase 1 clinical trial (Risitano et al., 2015).

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Global burden of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Head Injury as a Risk Factor for Dementia and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 32 Observational Studies

            Background Head injury is reported to be associated with increased risks of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in many but not all the epidemiological studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the relative effect of head injury on dementia and AD risks. Methods Relevant cohort and case-control studies published between Jan 1, 1990, and Mar 31, 2015 were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ScienceDirect. We used the random-effect model in this meta-analysis to take into account heterogeneity among studies. Results Data from 32 studies, representing 2,013,197 individuals, 13,866 dementia events and 8,166 AD events, were included in the analysis. Overall, the pooled relative risk (RR) estimates showed that head injury significantly increased the risks of any dementia (RR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.34–1.99) and AD (RR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.26–1.80), with no evidence of publication bias. However, when considering the status of unconsciousness, head injury with loss of consciousness did not show significant association with dementia (RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.67–1.27) and AD (RR = 1.49, 95% CI 0.91–2.43). Additionally, this positive association did not reach statistical significance in female participants. Conclusions The findings from this meta-analysis indicate that head injury is associated with increased risks of dementia and AD.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Identifying the role of complement in triggering neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury

              The complement system is implicated in promoting acute secondary injury after traumatic brain injury (TBI), but its role in chronic post-traumatic neuropathology remains unclear. Using various injury-site targeted complement inhibitors that block different complement pathways and activation products, we investigated how complement is involved in neurodegeneration and chronic neuroinflammation after TBI in a clinically relevant setting of complement inhibition. The current paradigm is that complement propagates post-TBI neuropathology predominantly through the terminal membrane attack complex (MAC), but the focus has been on acute outcomes. Following controlled cortical impact in adult male mice, we demonstrate that although inhibition of the MAC (with CR2-CD59) reduces acute deficits, inhibition of C3 activation is required to prevent chronic inflammation and ongoing neuronal loss. Activation of C3 triggered a sustained degenerative mechanism of microglial and astrocyte activation, reduced dendritic and synaptic density, and inhibited neuroblast migration several weeks after TBI. Moreover, inhibiting all complement pathways (with CR2-Crry), or only the alternative complement pathway (with CR2-fH), provided similar and significant improvements in chronic histological, cognitive, and functional recovery, indicating a key role for the alternative pathway in propagating chronic post-TBI pathology. Although we confirm a role for the MAC in acute neuronal loss after TBI, this study shows that upstream products of complement activation generated predominantly via the alternative pathway propagate chronic neuroinflammation, thus challenging the current concept that the MAC represents a therapeutic target for treating TBI. A humanized version of CR2fH has been shown to be safe and non-immunogenic in clinical trials. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Complement, and specifically the terminal membrane attack complex, has been implicated in secondary injury and neuronal loss after TBI. However, we demonstrate here that upstream complement activation products, generated predominantly via the alternative pathway, are responsible for propagating chronic inflammation and injury following CCI. Chronic inflammatory microgliosis is triggered by sustained complement activation after CCI, and is associated with chronic loss of neurons, dendrites and synapses, a process that continues to occur even 30 d after initial impact. Acute and injury-site targeted inhibition of the alternative pathway significantly improves chronic outcomes, and together these findings modify the conceptual paradigm for targeting the complement system to treat TBI.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neural Regen Res
                Neural Regen Res
                NRR
                Neural Regeneration Research
                Wolters Kluwer - Medknow (India )
                1673-5374
                1876-7958
                October 2022
                28 February 2022
                : 17
                : 10
                : 2228-2229
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
                Author notes
                [* ] Correspondence to: Ali M. Alawieh, ali.mostafa.alawieh@ 123456emory.edu .
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2601-8850
                Article
                NRR-17-2228
                10.4103/1673-5374.335799
                9083149
                35259841
                4734a89d-aa6f-46c2-b065-56577ce4a7f6
                Copyright: © Neural Regeneration Research

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 05 August 2021
                : 27 September 2021
                : 27 October 2021
                Categories
                Perspective

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content1,856

                Most referenced authors98