0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Maternal mental illness and child atopy: a UK population-based, primary care cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The number of children exposed to maternal mental illness is rapidly increasing and little is known about the effects of maternal mental illness on childhood atopy.

          Aim

          To investigate the association between maternal mental illness and risk of atopy among offspring.

          Design and setting

          Retrospective cohort study using a UK primary care database (674 general practices).

          Method

          In total, 590 778 children (born 1 January 1993 to 30 November 2017) were followed until their 18th birthday, with 359 611 linked to their hospital records. Time-varying exposure was captured for common (depression and anxiety), serious (psychosis), addiction (alcohol and substance misuse), and other (eating and personality disorder) maternal mental illness from 6 months before pregnancy. Using Cox regression models, incidence rates of atopy were calculated and compared for the exposed and unexposed children in primary (asthma, eczema, allergic rhinitis, and food allergies) and secondary (asthma and food allergies) care, adjusted for maternal (age, atopy history, smoking, and antibiotic use), child (sex, ethnicity, and birth year/season), and area covariates (deprivation and region).

          Results

          Children exposed to common maternal mental illness were at highest risk of developing asthma (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15 to 1.20) and allergic rhinitis (aHR 1.17, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.21), as well as a hospital admission for asthma (aHR 1.29, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.38). Children exposed to addiction disorders were 9% less likely to develop eczema (aHR 0.91, 95% CI = 0.85 to 0.97) and 35% less likely to develop food allergies (aHR 0.65, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.93).

          Conclusion

          The finding that risk of atopy varies by type of maternal mental illness prompts important aetiological questions. The link between common mental illness and childhood atopy requires GPs and policymakers to act and support vulnerable women to access preventive (for example, smoking cessation) services earlier.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement

          Routinely collected health data, obtained for administrative and clinical purposes without specific a priori research goals, are increasingly used for research. The rapid evolution and availability of these data have revealed issues not addressed by existing reporting guidelines, such as Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health Data (RECORD) statement was created to fill these gaps. RECORD was created as an extension to the STROBE statement to address reporting items specific to observational studies using routinely collected health data. RECORD consists of a checklist of 13 items related to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion section of articles, and other information required for inclusion in such research reports. This document contains the checklist and explanatory and elaboration information to enhance the use of the checklist. Examples of good reporting for each RECORD checklist item are also included herein. This document, as well as the accompanying website and message board (http://www.record-statement.org), will enhance the implementation and understanding of RECORD. Through implementation of RECORD, authors, journals editors, and peer reviewers can encourage transparency of research reporting.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)

            The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) is an ongoing primary care database of anonymised medical records from general practitioners, with coverage of over 11.3 million patients from 674 practices in the UK. With 4.4 million active (alive, currently registered) patients meeting quality criteria, approximately 6.9% of the UK population are included and patients are broadly representative of the UK general population in terms of age, sex and ethnicity. General practitioners are the gatekeepers of primary care and specialist referrals in the UK. The CPRD primary care database is therefore a rich source of health data for research, including data on demographics, symptoms, tests, diagnoses, therapies, health-related behaviours and referrals to secondary care. For over half of patients, linkage with datasets from secondary care, disease-specific cohorts and mortality records enhance the range of data available for research. The CPRD is very widely used internationally for epidemiological research and has been used to produce over 1000 research studies, published in peer-reviewed journals across a broad range of health outcomes. However, researchers must be aware of the complexity of routinely collected electronic health records, including ways to manage variable completeness, misclassification and development of disease definitions for research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data.

              There is a simple robust variance estimator for cluster-correlated data. While this estimator is well known, it is poorly documented, and its wide range of applicability is often not understood. The estimator is widely used in sample survey research, but the results in the sample survey literature are not easily applied because of complications due to unequal probability sampling. This brief note presents a general proof that the estimator is unbiased for cluster-correlated data regardless of the setting. The result is not new, but a simple and general reference is not readily available. The use of the method will benefit from a general explanation of its wide applicability.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Doctoral scholar
                Role: Research fellow
                Role: Professor of pharmacoepidemiology
                Role: Professor of psychological medicine and honorary consultant psychiatrist
                Role: Senior research fellow
                Journal
                Br J Gen Pract
                Br J Gen Pract
                bjgp
                bjgp
                The British Journal of General Practice
                Royal College of General Practitioners
                0960-1643
                1478-5242
                December 2023
                03 October 2023
                03 October 2023
                : 73
                : 737
                : e924-e931
                Affiliations
                Centre for Women’s Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester.
                Centre for Women’s Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester.
                Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, and National Institute for Health and Care Research Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester.
                Centre for Women’s Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester.
                Centre for Women’s Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester.
                Author notes
                Correspondence Holly Hope, Centre for Women’s Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, 3.320 Jean McFarlane Building Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK Email: holly.hope@ 123456manchester.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6904-2127
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4834-6719
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2958-915X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3538-8896
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2182-0369
                Article
                10.3399/BJGP.2022.0584
                10562998
                37783510
                472891fc-a2e2-4805-88af-7d604608bfe3
                © The Authors

                This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 24 November 2022
                : 18 January 2023
                : 08 May 2023
                Categories
                Research

                allergy and immunology,asthma,eczema, mental disorders,primary health care

                Comments

                Comment on this article