22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mortality Surveillance Methods to Identify and Characterize Deaths in Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance Network Sites

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 1 , 10 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 3 , 19 , 15 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 12 , 23 , 24 , 3 , 25 , 18 , 26 , 7 , 14 , 8 , 9 , 7 , 1 , 1 , Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) Methods Consortium
      Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
      Oxford University Press
      CHAMPS, child mortality, global health, surveillance

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite reductions over the past 2 decades, childhood mortality remains high in low- and middle-income countries in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. In these settings, children often die at home, without contact with the health system, and are neither accounted for, nor attributed with a cause of death. In addition, when cause of death determinations occur, they often use nonspecific methods. Consequently, findings from models currently utilized to build national and global estimates of causes of death are associated with substantial uncertainty. Higher-quality data would enable stakeholders to effectively target interventions for the leading causes of childhood mortality, a critical component to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals by eliminating preventable perinatal and childhood deaths. The Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) Network tracks the causes of under-5 mortality and stillbirths at sites in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia through comprehensive mortality surveillance, utilizing minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS), postmortem laboratory and pathology testing, verbal autopsy, and clinical and demographic data. CHAMPS sites have established facility- and community-based mortality notification systems, which aim to report potentially eligible deaths, defined as under-5 deaths and stillbirths within a defined catchment area, within 24–36 hours so that MITS can be conducted quickly after death. Where MITS has been conducted, a final cause of death is determined by an expert review panel. Data on cause of death will be provided to local, national, and global stakeholders to inform strategies to reduce perinatal and childhood mortality in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.

          Abstract

          This manuscript details methods for the establishment of mortality surveillance for timely detection of deaths in children <5 years of age and stillbirths in CHAMPS surveillance sites as well as data collection methods for notified and consented deaths.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          3.2 million stillbirths: epidemiology and overview of the evidence review

          More than 3.2 million stillbirths occur globally each year, yet stillbirths are largely invisible in global data tracking, policy dialogue and programme implementation. This mismatch of burden to action is due to a number of factors that keep stillbirths hidden, notably a lack of data and a lack of consensus on priority interventions, but also to social taboos that reduce the visibility of stillbirths and the associated family mourning. Whilst there are estimates of the numbers of stillbirths, to date there has been no systematic global analysis of the causes of stillbirths. The multiple classifications systems in use are often complex and are primarily focused on high-income countries. We review available data and propose a programmatic classification that is feasible and comparable across settings. We undertook a comprehensive global review of available information on stillbirths in order to 1) identify studies that evaluated risk factors and interventions to reduce stillbirths, 2) evaluate the level of evidence for interventions, 3) place the available evidence for interventions in a health systems context to guide programme implementation, and 4) elucidate key implementation, monitoring, and research gaps. This first paper in the series outlines issues in stillbirth data availability and quality, the global epidemiology of stillbirths, and describes the methodology and framework used for the review of interventions and strategies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of post mortem histology; a meta-analysis and review.

            The autopsy is in decline, despite the fact that accurate mortality statistics remain essential for public health and health service planning. The falling autopsy rate combined with the Coroners Review and Human Tissue Act have contributed to this decline, and to a falling use of autopsy histology, with potential impact on clinical audit and mortality statistics. At a time when the need for reform and improvement in the death certification process is so prominent, we felt it important to assess the value of the autopsy and autopsy histology. We carried out a meta-analysis of discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses and the contribution of autopsy histology. There has been little improvement in the overall rate of discrepancies between the 1960s and the present. At least a third of death certificates are likely to be incorrect and 50% of autopsies produce findings unsuspected before death. In addition, the cases which give rise to discrepancies cannot be identified prior to autopsy. Over 20% of clinically unexpected autopsy findings, including 5% of major findings, can be correctly diagnosed only by histological examination. Although the autopsy and particularly autopsy histology are being undermined, they are still the most accurate method of determining the cause of death and auditing accuracy of clinical diagnosis, diagnostic tests and death certification.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Willingness to Know the Cause of Death and Hypothetical Acceptability of the Minimally Invasive Autopsy in Six Diverse African and Asian Settings: A Mixed Methods Socio-Behavioural Study

              Background The minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) is being investigated as an alternative to complete diagnostic autopsies for cause of death (CoD) investigation. Before potential implementation of the MIA in settings where post-mortem procedures are unusual, a thorough assessment of its feasibility and acceptability is essential. Methods and Findings We conducted a socio-behavioural study at the community level to understand local attitudes and perceptions related to death and the hypothetical feasibility and acceptability of conducting MIAs in six distinct settings in Gabon, Kenya, Mali, Mozambique, and Pakistan. A total of 504 interviews (135 key informants, 175 health providers [including formal health professionals and traditional or informal health providers], and 194 relatives of deceased people) were conducted. The constructs “willingness to know the CoD” and “hypothetical acceptability of MIAs” were quantified and analysed using the framework analysis approach to compare the occurrence of themes related to acceptability across participants. Overall, 75% (379/504) of the participants would be willing to know the CoD of a relative. The overall hypothetical acceptability of MIA on a relative was 73% (366/504). The idea of the MIA was acceptable because of its perceived simplicity and rapidity and particularly for not “mutilating” the body. Further, MIAs were believed to help prevent infectious diseases, address hereditary diseases, clarify the CoD, and avoid witchcraft accusations and conflicts within families. The main concerns regarding the procedure included the potential breach of confidentiality on the CoD, the misperception of organ removal, and the incompatibility with some religious beliefs. Formal health professionals were concerned about possible contradictions between the MIA findings and the clinical pre-mortem diagnoses. Acceptability of the MIA was equally high among Christian and Islamic communities. However, in the two predominantly Muslim countries, MIA acceptability was higher in Mali than in Pakistan. While the results of the study are encouraging for the potential use of the MIA for CoD investigation in low-income settings, they remain hypothetical, with a need for confirmation with real-life MIA implementation and in populations beyond Health and Demographic Surveillance System areas. Conclusions This study showed a high level of interest in knowing the CoD of a relative and a high hypothetical acceptability of MIAs as a tool for CoD investigation across six distinct settings. These findings anticipate potential barriers and facilitators, both at the health facility and community level, essential for local tailoring of recommendations for future MIA implementation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Infect Dis
                Clin. Infect. Dis
                cid
                Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
                Oxford University Press (US )
                1058-4838
                1537-6591
                15 October 2019
                09 October 2019
                09 October 2019
                : 69
                : Suppl 4 , The Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) Network: Foundational Methods
                : S262-S273
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Emory Global Health Institute, Emory University , Atlanta, Georgia, USA
                [2 ] ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona , Spain
                [3 ] Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM) , Maputo, Mozambique
                [4 ] Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA) , Barcelona, Spain
                [5 ] Pediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Pediatrics Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona , Spain
                [6 ] Consorcio de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Epidemiologia y Salud , Spain
                [7 ] Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia, USA
                [8 ] Medical Research Council, Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences , Johannesburg, South Africa
                [9 ] Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences , Johannesburg, South Africa
                [10 ] icddr,b , Dhaka, Bangladesh
                [11 ] Maternal and Child Health Division , icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh
                [12 ] College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University , Harar, Ethiopia
                [13 ] World Hope International , Makeni, Sierra Leone
                [14 ] US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention–Kenya , Nairobi, Kenya
                [15 ] Public Health Informatics Institute, The Task Force for Global Health , Atlanta, Georgia, USA
                [16 ] Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland, USA
                [17 ] US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention–Sierra Leone , Freetown, Sierra Leone
                [18 ] Department of Pediatrics, Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland, USA
                [19 ] Instituto Nacional de Saude, Ministerio de Saude , Maputo, Mozambique
                [20 ] Kenya Medical Research Institute , Kisumu, Kenya
                [21 ] University of New South Wales , Sydney, Australia
                [22 ] PEI, Infectious Disease Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh
                [23 ] Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London, United Kingdom
                [24 ] KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme , Kilifi, Kenya
                [25 ] Centre pour le Développement des Vaccins (CVD-Mali), Ministère de la Santé , Bamako, Mali
                [26 ] International Association of National Public Health Institutes, US Office at Emory Global Health Institute, Emory University , Atlanta, Georgia, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence: N. T. Salzberg, Emory Global Health Institute, Emory University, 1599 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30329 ( navit.salzberg@ 123456emory.edu ).

                Members of the CHAMPS Network Consortium are listed in the Notes.

                Article
                ciz599
                10.1093/cid/ciz599
                6785672
                31598664
                45073b75-29c3-4747-862f-c25c514139b7
                © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 10.13039/100000865
                Award ID: OPP1126780
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust 10.13039/100010269
                Award ID: 098532
                Categories
                Supplement Articles

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                champs,child mortality,global health,surveillance
                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                champs, child mortality, global health, surveillance

                Comments

                Comment on this article