8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mobilization of Fluids in the Intensive Treatment of Primary and Secondary Lymphedemas

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Lymphedema is a clinical condition resulting from the accumulation of macromolecules in the interstitial space with a consequent buildup of fluids.

          Aim

          The objective of this study was to compare the therapeutic response to treatment that mobilizes fluids between primary and secondary lymphedemas.

          Method

          Thirty-three patients with severe leg lymphedema who underwent intensive treatment for five consecutive days in 2013 and 2014 at the Clínica Godoy were evaluated in a prospective clinical trial. Diagnosis was based on the patient's history and physical examination. Treatment consisted of eight hours/day of Mechanical Lymphatic Therapy using an electromechanical device (RAGodoy®) that performs plantar flexion and extension associated with 15 minutes of Cervical Lymphatic Therapy, a technique developed by Godoy and Godoy that involves stimulation in the cervical region and a grosgrain compression stocking alternated with elastic bandages. The unpaired t-test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis with an alpha error of 5% ( p value < 0.05) being considering acceptable. Secondary lymphedema was more prevalent in women (Fisher exact test p value < 0.01).

          Results

          The age of patients with secondary lymphedema was greater than those with primary lymphedema (unpaired t-test: p value < 0.03). The mean volume losses were 64.62% and 48.35% for the patients with secondary and primary lymphedema, respectively ( p value < 0.03).

          Conclusion

          Women are more prevalent and older in the secondary lymphedema group. Volumetric reductions below the knee are faster with intensive treatment for secondary rather than for primary lymphedema.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prevalence, classification, and risk factors for postoperative lower extremity lymphedema in women with gynecologic malignancies: a retrospective study.

          Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) is a major long-term complication of radical surgery. We aimed to estimate the incidence and grading of LEL in women who underwent lymphadenectomy and to evaluate risk factors associated with LEL.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Godoy & Godoy technique of cervical stimulation in the reduction of edema of the face after cancer treatment.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              IUA-ISVI consensus for diagnosis guideline of chronic lymphedema of the limbs.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                ScientificWorldJournal
                ScientificWorldJournal
                TSWJ
                The Scientific World Journal
                Hindawi
                2356-6140
                1537-744X
                2018
                10 May 2018
                : 2018
                : 6537253
                Affiliations
                1Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery Department, The Medicine School in São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP), CNPq (National Council for Research and Development), São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil
                2Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso Cuiabá, MT and Researcher Group of the Clínica Godoy, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil
                3Medicine School of São Jose do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil
                4Medicine School in São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP) and Researcher Group of the Clínica Godoy, São Jose do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Francesco Giallauria

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5424-7787
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9463-7608
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5161-1309
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4697-5757
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3725-7961
                Article
                10.1155/2018/6537253
                5971231
                43b98cb2-f458-473e-a7b8-2d446e6ebe32
                Copyright © 2018 Jose Maria Pereira de Godoy et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 2 September 2017
                : 20 December 2017
                : 11 January 2018
                Categories
                Clinical Study

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article