24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validation of the German version of the late adolescence and young adulthood survivorship-related quality of life measure (LAYA-SRQL)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Cancer has adverse effects on patient’s quality of life. As such, measuring quality of life (QoL) has become an integral part of psycho-oncological health care. Because adolescent and young adult patients have different needs in contrast to children and older cancer patients, instruments for adequately measuring QoL of cancer survivors in this age range are essential. As there is not a corresponding instrument in Germany, we aimed to validate the German version of the Late Adolescence and Young Adulthood Survivorship-Related Quality of Life Measure (LAYA-SRQL), a 30-item questionnaire covering 10 dimensions related to QoL.

          Methods

          The LAYA-SRQL was translated into German following state-of-the-art criteria. We enrolled 234 adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients with different tumour entities aged between 16 and 39 years old. Factorial structure was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency was determined by Cronbach’s α. The Short Form Survey quality of life questionnaire (SF-12v2) was used to examine convergent validity.

          Results

          The 10-factor structure of the LAYA-SRQL was confirmed in the German sample, and the model shows high values of fit indicators: χ 2 = 723.32 (df = 360, p < 0.001), CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.90, SRMR = 0.074, RMSEA = 0.066). Subscales showed acceptable to excellent internal consistencies with Cronbach’s α > 0.70 and total Cronbach’s α of 0.93. Convergent validity was demonstrated by high positive correlations between the LAYA-SRQL and the physical ( r = 0.45) and mental component ( r = 0.65) of the SF-12v2.

          Conclusions

          The German version of the LAYA-SRQL showed good psychometric properties. The instrument proved to be a highly reliable and valid instrument that can be recommended for use in the follow-up care of AYAs and for clinical research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors.

          A QOL instrument was developed to measure the specific concerns of long term cancer survivors. The QOL-CS is based on previous versions of the QOL instrument developed by researchers at the City of Hope National Medical Centre (Grant, Padilla, and Ferrell). This instrument was revised over a one year pilot by Hassey-Dow and Ferrell. The revised instrument included 41 items representing the four domains of quality of life incorporating physical, psychological, social, and spiritual well being. The present study was conducted as a mail survey to the membership (n = 1,200) of the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship with 686 subjects responding to the survey. This survey included a Demographic tool, QOL-CS and the FACT-G tool developed by Cella. Psychometric analysis, performed on 686 respondents, included measures of reliability and validity. Two measures of reliability included test-retest and internal consistency. The overall QOL-CS tool test-retest reliability was 0.89 with subscales of Physical r = 0.88, Psychological r = 0.88, Social r = 0.81, and Spiritual, r = 0.90. The second measure of reliability was computation of internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha coefficient as a measure of agreement between items and subscales. Analysis revealed an overall r = 0.93. Subscale alphas average ranged from r = 0.71 for spiritual well being, r = 0.77 for physical, r = 0.81 for social, and r = 0.89 for psychological. Several measures of validity were used to determine the extent to which the instrument measured the concept of QOL in cancer survivors. The first method of content validity was based on a panel of QOL researchers and nurses with expertise in oncology. The second measure used stepwise multiple regression to determine factors most predictive of overall QOL in cancer survivors. Seventeen variables were found to be statistically significant accounting for 91% of the variance in overall QOL. The fourth measure of validity used Pearson's correlations to estimate the relationships between the subscales of QOL-CS and the subscales of the established FACT-G tool. There was moderate to strong correlation between associated subscales including QOL-CS physical to FACT physical (r = 0.74), QOL-CS Psych to FACT Emotional (r = 0.65), QOL Social to FACT Social (r = 0.44). The overall QOL-CS correlation with the FACT-G was 0.78. Additional measures of validity included correlations of individual items of the QOL-CS tool, factor analysis, and construct validity discriminating known groups of cancer survivors. Findings demonstrated that the QOL-CS and its subscales adequately measured QOL in this growing population of cancer survivors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Cognitivie interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A case for including spirituality in quality of life measurement in oncology

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                493419715426 , Diana.Richter@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
                Anja.Mehnert@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
                Florian.Schepper@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
                Katja.Leuteritz@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
                crystal.park@uconn.edu
                Jochen.Ernst@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
                Journal
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
                BioMed Central (London )
                1477-7525
                4 January 2018
                4 January 2018
                2018
                : 16
                : 4
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8517 9062, GRID grid.411339.d, Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, , University Medical Center Leipzig, ; Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8517 9062, GRID grid.411339.d, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Hemostaseology, , University Medical Center Leipzig, ; Liebigstr. 20a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0860 4915, GRID grid.63054.34, Department of Psychology, , University of Connecticut, ; Psychological Sciences Department, Bousfield Psychology Building, 406 Babbidge Road, Unit 1020, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
                Article
                827
                10.1186/s12955-017-0827-1
                5755338
                29301526
                43b259ed-67e9-4734-b94f-2943e848740e
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 23 May 2017
                : 14 December 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100005677, José Carreras Leukämie-Stiftung;
                Award ID: DJCLS F 15/02
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Health & Social care
                cancer,assessment,quality of life,adolescents and young adults,validation
                Health & Social care
                cancer, assessment, quality of life, adolescents and young adults, validation

                Comments

                Comment on this article