18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association between maternal sleep practices and late stillbirth – findings from a stillbirth case‐control study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To report maternal sleep practices in women who experienced a stillbirth compared with controls with ongoing live pregnancies at similar gestation.

          Design

          Prospective case‐control study.

          Setting

          Forty‐one maternity units in the United Kingdom.

          Population

          Women who had a stillbirth after ≥ 28 weeks’ gestation (n = 291) and women with an ongoing pregnancy at the time of interview (n = 733).

          Methods

          Data were collected using an interviewer‐administered questionnaire that included questions on maternal sleep practices before pregnancy, in the four weeks prior to, and on the night before the interview/stillbirth.

          Main outcome measures

          Maternal sleep practices during pregnancy.

          Results

          In multivariable analysis, supine going‐to‐sleep position the night before stillbirth had a 2.3‐fold increased risk of late stillbirth [adjusted Odds Ratio ( aOR) 2.31, 95% CI 1.04–5.11] compared with the left side. In addition, women who had a stillbirth were more likely to report sleep duration less than 5.5 hours on the night before stillbirth ( aOR 1.83, 95% CI 1.24–2.68), getting up to the toilet once or less ( aOR 2.81, 95% CI 1.85–4.26), and a daytime nap every day ( aOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.26–3.94). No interaction was detected between supine going‐to‐sleep position and a small‐for‐gestational‐age infant, maternal body mass index, or gestational age. The population‐attributable risk for supine going‐to‐sleep position was 3.7% (95% CI 0.5–9.2).

          Conclusions

          This study confirms that supine going‐to‐sleep position is associated with late stillbirth. Further work is required to determine whether intervention(s) can decrease the frequency of supine going‐to‐sleep position and the incidence of late stillbirth.

          Tweetable abstract

          Supine going‐to‐sleep position is associated with 2.3× increased risk of stillbirth after 28 weeks’ gestation.

          Plain Language Summary

          Stillbirth, the death of a baby before birth, is a tragedy for mothers and families. One approach to reduce stillbirths is to identify factors that are associated with stillbirth. There are few risk factors for stillbirth that can be easily changed, but this study is looking at identifying how mothers may be able to reduce their risk.

          In this study, we interviewed 291 women who had a stillbirth and 733 women who had a live‐born baby from 41 maternity units throughout the UK. The mothers who had a stillbirth were interviewed as soon as practical after their baby died. Mothers who had a live birth were interviewed during their pregnancies at the same times in pregnancy as when the stillbirths occurred. We did not interview mothers who had twins or who had a baby with a major abnormality.

          Mothers who went to sleep on their back had at least twice the risk of stillbirth compared with mothers who went to sleep on their left‐hand side. This study suggests that 3.7% of stillbirths after 28 weeks of pregnancy were linked with going to sleep lying on the back. This study also shows that the link between going‐to‐sleep position and late stillbirth was not affected by the duration of pregnancy after 28 weeks, the size of the baby, or the mother's weight. Women who got up to the toilet once or more at night had a reduced risk of stillbirth.

          This is the largest of four similar studies that have all shown the same link between the position in which a mother goes to sleep and stillbirth after 28 weeks of pregnancy. Further studies are needed to see whether women can easily change their sleep position in late pregnancy and whether changing the position a mother goes to sleep in reduces stillbirth.

          Abstract

          Tweetable abstract

          Supine going‐to‐sleep position is associated with 2.3× increased risk of stillbirth after 28 weeks’ gestation.

          This paper includes Author Insights, a video abstract available at https://vimeo.com/rcog/authorinsights14967

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Applying the Bradford Hill criteria in the 21st century: how data integration has changed causal inference in molecular epidemiology

          In 1965, Sir Austin Bradford Hill published nine “viewpoints” to help determine if observed epidemiologic associations are causal. Since then, the “Bradford Hill Criteria” have become the most frequently cited framework for causal inference in epidemiologic studies. However, when Hill published his causal guidelines—just 12 years after the double-helix model for DNA was first suggested and 25 years before the Human Genome Project began—disease causation was understood on a more elementary level than it is today. Advancements in genetics, molecular biology, toxicology, exposure science, and statistics have increased our analytical capabilities for exploring potential cause-and-effect relationships, and have resulted in a greater understanding of the complexity behind human disease onset and progression. These additional tools for causal inference necessitate a re-evaluation of how each Bradford Hill criterion should be interpreted when considering a variety of data types beyond classic epidemiology studies. Herein, we explore the implications of data integration on the interpretation and application of the criteria. Using examples of recently discovered exposure–response associations in human disease, we discuss novel ways by which researchers can apply and interpret the Bradford Hill criteria when considering data gathered using modern molecular techniques, such as epigenetics, biomarkers, mechanistic toxicology, and genotoxicology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study.

            To develop and test a new classification system for stillbirths to help improve understanding of the main causes and conditions associated with fetal death. Population based cohort study. West Midlands region. 2625 stillbirths from 1997 to 2003. Categories of death according to conventional classification methods and a newly developed system (ReCoDe, relevant condition at death). By the conventional Wigglesworth classification, 66.2% of the stillbirths (1738 of 2625) were unexplained. The median gestational age of the unexplained group was 237 days, significantly higher than the stillbirths in the other categories (210 days; P < 0.001). The proportion of stillbirths that were unexplained was high regardless of whether a postmortem examination had been carried out or not (67% and 65%; P = 0.3). By the ReCoDe classification, the most common condition was fetal growth restriction (43.0%), and only 15.2% of stillbirths remained unexplained. ReCoDe identified 57.7% of the Wigglesworth unexplained stillbirths as growth restricted. The size of the category for intrapartum asphyxia was reduced from 11.7% (Wigglesworth) to 3.4% (ReCoDe). The new ReCoDe classification system reduces the predominance of stillbirths currently categorised as unexplained. Fetal growth restriction is a common antecedent of stillbirth, but its high prevalence is hidden by current classification systems. This finding has profound implications for maternity services, and raises the question whether some hitherto "unexplained" stillbirths may be avoidable.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Association between stillbirth and risk factors known at pregnancy confirmation.

              (2011)
              Stillbirths account for almost half of US deaths from 20 weeks' gestation to 1 year of life. Most large studies of risk factors for stillbirth use vital statistics with limited data. To determine the relation between stillbirths and risk factors that could be ascertained at the start of pregnancy, particularly the contribution of these factors to racial disparities. Multisite population-based case-control study conducted between March 2006 and September 2008. Fifty-nine US tertiary care and community hospitals, with access to at least 90% of deliveries within 5 catchment areas defined by state and county lines, enrolled residents with deliveries of 1 or more stillborn fetuses and a representative sample of deliveries of only live-born infants, oversampled for those at less than 32 weeks' gestation and those of African descent. Stillbirth. Analysis included 614 case and 1816 control deliveries. In multivariate analyses, the following factors were independently associated with stillbirth: non-Hispanic black race/ethnicity (23.1% stillbirths, 11.2% live births) (vs non-Hispanic whites; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.12 [95% CI, 1.41-3.20]); previous stillbirth (6.7% stillbirths, 1.4% live births); nulliparity with (10.5% stillbirths, 5.2% live births) and without (34.0% stillbirths, 29.7% live births) previous losses at fewer than 20 weeks' gestation (vs multiparity without stillbirth or previous losses; AOR, 5.91 [95% CI, 3.18-11.00]; AOR, 3.13 [95% CI, 2.06-4.75]; and AOR, 1.98 [95% CI, 1.51-2.60], respectively); diabetes (5.6% stillbirths, 1.6% live births) (vs no diabetes; AOR, 2.50 [95% CI, 1.39-4.48]); maternal age 40 years or older (4.5% stillbirths, 2.1% live births) (vs age 20-34 years; AOR, 2.41 [95% CI, 1.24-4.70]); maternal AB blood type (4.9% stillbirths, 3.0% live births) (vs type O; AOR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.16-3.30]); history of drug addiction (4.5% stillbirths, 2.1% live births) (vs never use; AOR, 2.08 [95% CI, 1.12-3.88]); smoking during the 3 months prior to pregnancy (<10 cigarettes/d, 10.0% stillbirths, 6.5% live births) (vs none; AOR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.02-2.35]); obesity/overweight (15.5% stillbirths, 12.4% live births) (vs normal weight; AOR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.22-2.43]); not living with a partner (25.4% stillbirths, 15.3% live births) (vs married; AOR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.15-2.27]); and plurality (6.4% stillbirths, 1.9% live births) (vs singleton; AOR, 4.59 [95% CI, 2.63-8.00]). The generalized R(2) was 0.19, explaining little of the variance. Multiple risk factors that would have been known at the time of pregnancy confirmation were associated with stillbirth but accounted for only a small amount of the variance in this outcome.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                alexander.heazell@manchester.ac.uk
                Journal
                BJOG
                BJOG
                10.1111/(ISSN)1471-0528
                BJO
                Bjog
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1470-0328
                1471-0528
                20 November 2017
                January 2018
                : 125
                : 2 , Stillbirth ( doiID: 10.1111/bjo.2018.125.issue-2 )
                : 254-262
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre School of Medical Sciences Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health University of Manchester Manchester UK
                [ 2 ] St. Mary's Hospital Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester Academic Health Science Centre Manchester UK
                [ 3 ] Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology The University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand
                [ 4 ] Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health The University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand
                [ 5 ] School of Healthcare University of Leeds Leeds UK
                [ 6 ] Birmingham Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
                [ 7 ] Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Liverpool UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence: Dr AEP Heazell, Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, St Mary's Hospital, 5th floor (Research), Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK. Email alexander.heazell@ 123456manchester.ac.uk
                Article
                BJO14967
                10.1111/1471-0528.14967
                5765411
                29152887
                42bbe4a5-452a-46be-9cd2-7b883a93c917
                © 2017 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 05 October 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 9, Words: 7039
                Funding
                Funded by: Action Medical Research
                Award ID: GN2156
                Funded by: Cure Kids
                Funded by: Sands
                Funded by: Tommy's and the National Institute of Health Research
                Award ID: CS‐13‐009
                Categories
                Epidemiology & Public health ‐ From data to prevention
                Epidemiology & Public health ‐ From data to prevention
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                bjo14967
                January 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.2.8 mode:remove_FC converted:12.01.2018

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                maternal sleep position,modifiable risk factors,sleep duration,stillbirth

                Comments

                Comment on this article