6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Anti-cancer immune responses to DNA damage response inhibitors: Molecular mechanisms and progress toward clinical translation

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          DNA damage response inhibitors are widely used anti-cancer agents that have potent activity against tumor cells with deficiencies in various DNA damage response proteins such as BRCA1/2. Inhibition of other proteins in this pathway including PARP, DNA-PK, WEE1, CHK1/2, ATR, or ATM can sensitize cancer cells to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and such combinations are currently being tested in clinical trials for treatment of many malignancies including breast, ovarian, rectal, and lung cancer. Unrepaired DNA damage induced by DNA damage response inhibitors alone or in combination with radio- or chemotherapy has a direct cytotoxic effect on cancer cells and can also engage anti-cancer innate and adaptive immune responses. DNA damage-induced immune stimulation occurs by a variety of mechanisms including by the cGAS/STING pathway, STAT1 and downstream TRAIL pathway activation, and direct immune cell activation. Whether or not the relative contribution of these mechanisms varies after treatment with different DNA damage response inhibitors or across cancers with different genetic aberrations in DNA damage response enzymes is not well-characterized, limiting the design of optimal combinations with radio- and chemotherapy. Here, we review how the inhibition of key DNA damage response enzymes including PARP, DNA-PK, WEE1, CHK1/2, ATR, and ATM induces innate and adaptive immune responses alone or in combination with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and/or immunotherapy. We also discuss current progress in the clinical translation of immunostimulatory DNA-damaging treatment regimens and necessary future directions to optimize the immune-sensitizing potential of DNA damage response inhibitors.

          Graphical Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references116

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Oxidative stress, inflammation, and cancer: how are they linked?

          Extensive research during the past 2 decades has revealed the mechanism by which continued oxidative stress can lead to chronic inflammation, which in turn could mediate most chronic diseases including cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular, neurological, and pulmonary diseases. Oxidative stress can activate a variety of transcription factors including NF-κB, AP-1, p53, HIF-1α, PPAR-γ, β-catenin/Wnt, and Nrf2. Activation of these transcription factors can lead to the expression of over 500 different genes, including those for growth factors, inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, cell cycle regulatory molecules, and anti-inflammatory molecules. How oxidative stress activates inflammatory pathways leading to transformation of a normal cell to tumor cell, tumor cell survival, proliferation, chemoresistance, radioresistance, invasion, angiogenesis, and stem cell survival is the focus of this review. Overall, observations to date suggest that oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, and cancer are closely linked. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Targeting apoptosis in cancer therapy

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              cGAS surveillance of micronuclei links genome instability to innate immunity

              Summary DNA is strictly compartmentalised within the nucleus to prevent autoimmunity1; despite this cGAS, a cytosolic sensor of dsDNA, is activated in autoinflammatory disorders and by DNA damage2–6. Precisely how cellular DNA gains access to the cytoplasm remains to be determined. Here, we report that cGAS localises to micronuclei arising from genome instability in a model of monogenic autoinflammation, after exogenous DNA damage and spontaneously in human cancer cells. These micronuclei occur after mis-segregation of DNA during cell division and consist of chromatin surrounded by their own nuclear membrane. Breakdown of the micronuclear envelope, a process associated with chromothripsis7, leads to rapid accumulation of cGAS, providing a mechanism by which self-DNA becomes exposed to the cytosol. cGAS binds to and is activated by chromatin and, consistent with a mitotic origin, micronuclei formation and the proinflammatory response following DNA-damage are cell-cycle dependent. Furthermore, by combining live-cell laser microdissection with single cell transcriptomics, we establish that induction of interferon stimulated gene expression occurs in micronucleated cells. We therefore conclude that micronuclei represent an important source of immunostimulatory DNA. As micronuclei formed from lagging chromosomes also activate this pathway, cGAS recognition of micronuclei may act as a cell-intrinsic immune surveillance mechanism detecting a range of neoplasia-inducing processes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                06 October 2022
                2022
                : 12
                : 998388
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Laboratory of Translational Oncology and Experimental Cancer Therapeutics, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University , Providence, RI, United States
                [2] 2 The Joint Program in Cancer Biology, Brown University and the Lifespan Health System , Providence, RI, United States
                [3] 3 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University , Providence, RI, United States
                [4] 4 Pathobiology Graduate Program, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University , Providence, RI, United States
                [5] 5 Cancer Center, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University , Providence, RI, United States
                [6] 6 Department of Medicine, Hematology-Oncology Division, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University , Providence, RI, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Qiang Zhang, University of Michigan, United States

                Reviewed by: Guang Peng, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; Abdul Q. Khan, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar

                *Correspondence: Wafik S. El-Deiry, wafik_el-deiry@ 123456brown.edu

                This article was submitted to Radiation Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2022.998388
                9583871
                36276148
                42a8cd2a-5759-4999-9389-4ddf4049d57d
                Copyright © 2022 Carlsen and El-Deiry

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 19 July 2022
                : 09 September 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 116, Pages: 12, Words: 5650
                Categories
                Oncology
                Review

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                dna damage response (ddr),immunotherapy,cgas/sting,dna-pk,wee1,chk1/2,atr,atm
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                dna damage response (ddr), immunotherapy, cgas/sting, dna-pk, wee1, chk1/2, atr, atm

                Comments

                Comment on this article