5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The transfer of knowledge on integrated care among five European regions: a qualitative multi-method study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          To examine how the knowledge transfer processes unfolded within SCIROCCO, a EU funded project (3rd Health Programme (2014–2020)) that aimed to facilitate the process of knowledge sharing across five European regions, to speed up adoption and scaling-up of integrated care initiatives.

          Methods

          A qualitative multi-method design was used. Data collection methods included focus groups, project documents and action plans of the regions. The data was analysed using a qualitative content-analysis procedure, which was guided by the frameworks of knowledge exchange and the why, whose, what, how framework for knowledge mobilisers.

          Results

          All five components (including the themes) of knowledge exchange could be identified in the approach developed on the knowledge transfer processes. The four questions and accompanying categories of the framework of knowledge mobilisation were also identified to a large degree.

          Conclusions

          The observed incorporation of distinct forms of knowledge from multiple sources and the observed dynamic and fluid knowledge transfer processes both suggest that SCIROCCO developed a comprehensive knowledge transfer approach aiming to enable the adoption and scaling-up of integrated care. Overall, the multi-method qualitative nature of this research has allowed some new and practical insights in the knowledge transfer activities on integrated care between several European regions. To obtain a clear understanding of the content of the knowledge transfer approaches, which could assist the operationalising of models to support the evaluation of knowledge transfer activities, it is strongly recommended that further research of this type should be conducted in other research settings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Developing a framework for transferring knowledge into action: a thematic analysis of the literature.

          Although there is widespread agreement about the importance of transferring knowledge into action, we still lack high quality information about what works, in which settings and with whom. While there are a large number of models and theories for knowledge transfer interventions, the majority are untested, meaning that their applicability and relevance is largely unknown. This paper describes the development of a conceptual framework of translating knowledge into action and discusses how it can be used for developing a useful model of the knowledge transfer process. A narrative review of the knowledge transfer literature identified 28 different models which explained all or part of the knowledge transfer process. The models were subjected to a thematic analysis to identify individual components and the types of processes used when transferring knowledge into action. The results were used to build a conceptual framework of the process. Five common components of the knowledge transfer process were identified: problem identification and communication; knowledge/research development and selection; analysis of context; knowledge transfer activities or interventions; and knowledge/research utilization. We also identified three types of knowledge transfer processes: a linear process; a cyclical process; and a dynamic multidirectional process. From these results a conceptual framework of knowledge transfer was developed. The framework illustrates the five common components of the knowledge transfer process and shows that they are connected via a complex, multidirectional set of interactions. As such the framework allows for the individual components to occur simultaneously or in any given order and to occur more than once during the knowledge transfer process. Our framework provides a foundation for gathering evidence from case studies of knowledge transfer interventions. We propose that future empirical work is designed to test and refine the relevance, importance and applicability of each of the components in order to build a more useful model of knowledge transfer which can serve as a practical checklist for planning or evaluating knowledge transfer activities.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              The SPIRIT Action Framework: A structured approach to selecting and testing strategies to increase the use of research in policy.

              The recent proliferation of strategies designed to increase the use of research in health policy (knowledge exchange) demands better application of contemporary conceptual understandings of how research shapes policy. Predictive models, or action frameworks, are needed to organise existing knowledge and enable a more systematic approach to the selection and testing of intervention strategies. Useful action frameworks need to meet four criteria: have a clearly articulated purpose; be informed by existing knowledge; provide an organising structure to build new knowledge; and be capable of guiding the development and testing of interventions. This paper describes the development of the SPIRIT Action Framework. A literature search and interviews with policy makers identified modifiable factors likely to influence the use of research in policy. An iterative process was used to combine these factors into a pragmatic tool which meets the four criteria. The SPIRIT Action Framework can guide conceptually-informed practical decisions in the selection and testing of interventions to increase the use of research in policy. The SPIRIT Action Framework hypothesises that a catalyst is required for the use of research, the response to which is determined by the capacity of the organisation to engage with research. Where there is sufficient capacity, a series of research engagement actions might occur that facilitate research use. These hypotheses are being tested in ongoing empirical work.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                fennechien.grooten@vub.be
                bert.vrijhoef@panaxea.eu
                tamara.alhambra@uv.es
                diane.whitehouse@ehtel.eu
                Dirk.Devroey@vub.be
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                3 January 2020
                3 January 2020
                2020
                : 20
                : 11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2290 8069, GRID grid.8767.e, Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, , Vrije Universiteit Brussel, ; P.O. 103, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0480 1382, GRID grid.412966.e, Department Patient & Care, , Maastricht University Medical Center, ; Maastricht, the Netherlands
                [3 ]Panaxea B.V, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2290 8069, GRID grid.8767.e, Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, , Vrije Universiteit Brussel, ; Brussel, Belgium
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2173 938X, GRID grid.5338.d, Polibienestar Research Institute, Universitat de Valencia, ; Valencia, Spain
                [6 ]GRID grid.424833.a, European Health Telematics Association (EHTEL), ; Brussels, Belgium
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4515-2596
                Article
                4865
                10.1186/s12913-019-4865-8
                6942405
                31900146
                423d1adb-55c2-4160-bc54-0fae994aff47
                © The Author(s). 2020

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 11 June 2019
                : 23 December 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100013272, Third Health Programme;
                Award ID: 710033
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Health & Social care
                knowledge transfer,delivery of health care,integrated,scaling-up
                Health & Social care
                knowledge transfer, delivery of health care, integrated, scaling-up

                Comments

                Comment on this article