21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Inside and Out: Factors That Support and Hinder the Self-Advocacy of Undergraduates with ADHD and/or Specific Learning Disabilities in STEM

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Self-advocacy is linked to the success and retention of students with disabilities in college. Self-advocacy is defined as communicating individual wants, needs, and rights to determine and pursue required accommodations. While self-advocacy is linked to academic success, little is known about how students with disabilities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) practice self-advocacy. We previously developed a model of self-advocacy for STEM students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and/or specific learning disabilities (SLD). Here, we use this model to examine what factors support or hinder self-advocacy in undergraduate STEM courses. We conducted semistructured interviews with 25 STEM majors with ADHD and/or SLD and used qualitative approaches to analyze our data. We found internal factors, or factors within a participant, and external factors, the situations and people, described by our participants, that influenced self-advocacy. These factors often interacted and functioned as a support or barrier, depending on the individuals and their unique experiences. We developed a model to understand how factors supported or hindered self-advocacy in STEM. Supporting factors contributed to a sense of comfort and security for our participants and informed their perceptions that accommodation use was accepted in a STEM course. We share implications for research and teaching based on our results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references79

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Qualitative Quality: Eight "Big-Tent" Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness.

            L Krefting (1991)
            Despite a growing interest in qualitative research in occupational therapy, little attention has been placed on establishing its rigor. This article presents one model that can be used for the assessment of trustworthiness or merit of qualitative inquiry. Guba's (1981) model describes four general criteria for evaluation of research and then defines each from both a quantitative and a qualitative perspective. Several strategies for the achievement of rigor in qualitative research useful for both researchers and consumers of research are described.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Book: not found

              The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers

              Johnny Saldaña’s unique and invaluable manual demystifies the qualitative coding process with a comprehensive assessment of different coding types, examples and exercises. The ideal reference for students, teachers, and practitioners of qualitative inquiry, it is essential reading across the social sciences and neatly guides you through the multiple approaches available for coding qualitative data.</p> <p>Its wide array of strategies, from the more straightforward to the more complex, is skillfully explained and carefully exemplified providing a complete toolkit of codes and skills that can be applied to any research project. For each code Saldaña provides information about the method′s origin, gives a detailed description of the method, demonstrates its practical applications, and sets out a clearly illustrated example with analytic follow-up. <br> <br> Now with a companion website, the book is supported by: </p> <ul> <li>SAGE journal articles showing coding being applied to real research </li> <li>Sample transcripts highlighting coding techniques </li> <li>Links to CAQDAS sites to introduce relevant software </li> <li>Practical student exercises Links to video and digital content </li> </ul> <p>This international bestseller is an extremely usable, robust manual and is a must-have resource for qualitative researchers at all levels.<br> <br> Click here for a listing of Johnny Saldaña′s upcoming workshops.</p>
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Monitoring Editor
                Journal
                CBE Life Sci Educ
                CBE Life Sci Educ
                CBE-LSE
                lse
                CBE Life Sciences Education
                American Society for Cell Biology
                1931-7913
                Summer 2021
                : 20
                : 2
                : ar17
                Affiliations
                []Department of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
                []Department of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
                Author notes
                *Address correspondence to: Julie Dangremond Stanton ( stantonj@ 123456uga.edu ).
                Article
                CBE.20-06-0107
                10.1187/cbe.20-06-0107
                8734393
                33769838
                40df360f-f6d4-4e4b-be9a-bc5b81d18777
                © 2021 M. A. Pfeifer et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2021 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology.

                This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License.

                History
                : 02 June 2020
                : 28 December 2020
                : 27 January 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Education
                Education

                Comments

                Comment on this article