10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Performance of the WHOQOL-BREF among Norwegian substance use disorder patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Quality of life (QoL) is an established outcome measure of substance use disorder treatment. The WHOQOL-BREF is the gold standard tool, but its appropriateness for particularly vulnerable patient populations must be further explored. This article examines the scaling qualities of the WHOQOL-BREF in a Norwegian substance use disorder population, and explores relationships with social and health variables.

          Methods

          107 participants in a larger national treatment study provided data during structured interviews. Item responses, responsiveness, and domain scaling qualities are reported. General linear models identified correlates of impaired QoL.

          Results

          Three out of four domains exhibited acceptable scaling qualities, while the social relationships domain had low internal validity. 59% of the variance in physical health QoL was explained in our model by the negative main or interaction effects of depression, unemployment, social isolation, smoking, residential treatment, and weight dissatisfaction. 52% of the variance in psychological health QoL was explained by depression and being single. Depression also had significant main effects in social relationships QoL (R 2 = .27) and environment QoL (R 2 = .39), and social isolation and exercise had further interaction effects in environment QoL.

          Conclusions

          After one year in treatment, the impact of low social contact in reducing QoL, rather than specific substance use patterns, was striking. The social relationships domain is the shortest in the WHOQOL-BREF, yet social variables were important in other areas of QoL. Social support could benefit from more attention in treatment, as a lack of social support seems to be a strong risk factor for poor QoL in various domains. The WHOQOL-BREF exhibits otherwise satisfactory measurement characteristics and is an appropriate tool among this population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: a meta-analysis.

          Meta-analysis is used to synthesize findings from 286 empirical studies on the association of socioeconomic status (SES), social network, and competence with subjective well-being (SWB) in the elderly. All three aspects of life circumstances are positively associated with SWB. Income is correlated more strongly with well-being than is education. The quality of social contacts shows stronger associations with SWB than does the quantity of social contacts. Whereas having contact with friends is more strongly related to SWB than having contact with adult children, there are higher associations between life satisfaction and quality of contact with adult children when compared with quality of friendships. Moderating influences of gender and age on the effects of SES, social network, and competence on SWB are also investigated.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An international systematic review of smoking prevalence in addiction treatment.

            Smoking prevalence is higher among people enrolled in addiction treatment compared with the general population, and very high rates of smoking are associated with opiate drug use and receipt of opiate replacement therapy (ORT). We assessed whether these findings are observed internationally.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Case for Considering Quality of Life in Addiction Research and Clinical Practice

              Substance use disorders are increasingly viewed as chronic conditions, and addiction treatment services are beginning to adopt models that were developed to address other chronic conditions. These models address the impact of disease and services on the patient’s overall well-being. From this perspective, treatment for addiction aims for the broad goal of recovery, which is defined as abstinence plus improved quality of life. However, the addiction field has come late to the chronic disease perspective, and the concept of quality of life in addiction is relatively undeveloped. This article reviews the evidence for the relevance of quality of life in substance use disorder treatment and recovery and discusses the importance of incorporating quality-of-life indices into research and services.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ashley.muller@medisin.uio.no
                Svetlana.skurtveit@fhi.no
                Thomas.clausen@medisin.uio.no
                Journal
                BMC Med Res Methodol
                BMC Med Res Methodol
                BMC Medical Research Methodology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2288
                4 March 2019
                4 March 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 44
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8921, GRID grid.5510.1, Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, , University of Oslo, ; Pb 1039 Blindern, 0315 Oslo, Norway
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1541 4204, GRID grid.418193.6, Division of Health Services, , Norwegian Institute of Public Health, ; Pb 4044 Nydalen, 0403 Oslo, Norway
                [3 ]Department of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Heath, Pb 4044 Nydalen, 0403 Oslo, Norway
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7819-6697
                Article
                690
                10.1186/s12874-019-0690-3
                6399843
                30832564
                40cb3510-b708-4e53-a685-4b94ed90db86
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 15 June 2018
                : 22 February 2019
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Medicine
                quality of life,substance use disorder,psychometrics,social isolation
                Medicine
                quality of life, substance use disorder, psychometrics, social isolation

                Comments

                Comment on this article