3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Does Arch Stiffness Influence Running Spatiotemporal Parameters? An Analysis of the Relationship between Influencing Factors on Running Performance

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study aimed to determine the influence of arch stiffness on running spatiotemporal parameters at a common speed for a wide range of endurance runners (i.e., 12 km·h −1). In total, 97 runners, 52 men and 45 women, completed a treadmill running protocol at 12 km·h −1. Spatiotemporal parameters were measured using the OptoGait system, and foot structure was assessed by determining arch stiffness. Since between-sex differences were found in anthropometric and foot structure variables, data analysis was conducted separately for men and women, and body mass and height were considered as covariates. For both sexes, a k-means cluster analysis grouped participants according to arch stiffness, by obtaining a group of low-arch stiffness (LAS group) and a group of high-arch stiffness (HAS group), with significant differences in arch stiffness ( p < 0.001, for both men and women). No significant differences between LAS and HAS groups were found in running spatiotemporal parameters, regardless of sex ( p ≥ 0.05). For both sexes, the partial correlation analysis reported no significant correlations ( p ≥ 0.05) between foot structure variables and running spatiotemporal parameters. The results obtained show no differences in spatiotemporal gait characteristics during running at submaximal velocity between runners with low-arch stiffness and those with high-arch stiffness, regardless of sex. These findings may have important implications for clinicians and coaches by adding more evidence to the debate about the use of static foot classification measures when characterizing the foot and its biomechanics during running.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

          G*Power (Erdfelder, Faul, & Buchner, 1996) was designed as a general stand-alone power analysis program for statistical tests commonly used in social and behavioral research. G*Power 3 is a major extension of, and improvement over, the previous versions. It runs on widely used computer platforms (i.e., Windows XP, Windows Vista, and Mac OS X 10.4) and covers many different statistical tests of the t, F, and chi2 test families. In addition, it includes power analyses for z tests and some exact tests. G*Power 3 provides improved effect size calculators and graphic options, supports both distribution-based and design-based input modes, and offers all types of power analyses in which users might be interested. Like its predecessors, G*Power 3 is free.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

            (2013)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The spring-mass model for running and hopping

              R Blickhan (1989)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                02 March 2021
                March 2021
                : 18
                : 5
                : 2437
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Physical Education and Sports, University of Granada, 18010 Granada, Spain; vsoto@ 123456ugr.es
                [2 ]Department of Physical Education, Sports and Recreation, Universidad de La Frontera, 1145 Temuco, Chile
                [3 ]Campus Universitario, Universidad San Jorge, 50830 Villanueva de Gállego Zaragoza, Spain; djaen@ 123456usj.es (D.J.-C.); leroche@ 123456usj.es (L.E.R.-S.)
                [4 ]Department of Corporal Expression, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaén, Spain; platorre@ 123456ujaen.es
                [5 ]Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Central de Cataluña, 08500 Barcelona, Spain; cescalona@ 123456umanresa.cat
                [6 ]Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), 18007 Granada, Spain
                [7 ]Department of Education, Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana, 24560 Campeche, Mexico; carlos.lago@ 123456uneatlantico.es (C.L.-F.); irma.dominguez@ 123456uneatlantico.es (I.D.-A.)
                [8 ]Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Europea del Atlántico, 39011 Santander, Spain
                [9 ]Department of Languages and Education, Universidad Europea del Atlántico, 39011 Santander, Spain; silvia.pueyo@ 123456uneatlantico.es
                [10 ]Research Group on Foods, Nutritional Biochemistry and Health, Universidad Europea del Atlántico, 39011 Santander, Spain
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: fgpinillos@ 123456ugr.es
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7518-8234
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0588-0871
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0517-3627
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4139-9911
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7261-5205
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8492-9244
                Article
                ijerph-18-02437
                10.3390/ijerph18052437
                7967574
                405d9002-87cb-4ab0-ac3d-05aa7e2849b6
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 03 February 2021
                : 19 February 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                arch height,arch mobility,endurance runners,foot,spring-mass model
                Public health
                arch height, arch mobility, endurance runners, foot, spring-mass model

                Comments

                Comment on this article