There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
To assess agreement among health professionals with regard to the need for urgent
care among emergency department patients.
We conducted a chart review of 266 ED patients in an urban teaching hospital. Eight
health professionals (four emergency nurses, two emergency physicians, two family
physicians) used identical criteria to retrospectively rate urgency. Agreement was
measured for all reviewers, as well as among health professionals of the same specialty.
Agreement was also measured between one ED nurse's retrospective assessment and the
prospective assessments of the triage nurses who had seen the patients on presentation.
The percentage of patients rated as needing urgent care by the retrospective reviewers
ranged from 11% to 63%. Agreement among the retrospective reviewers was fair (kappa
= .38; 95% confidence interval, .30 to .46) and was no better among reviewers of the
same specialty. We found only slight agreement between the nurse reviewer's retrospective
assessment and the triage nurses' prospective assessments (kappa = 19; 95% confidence
interval, .07 to .31).
Even when using the same criteria, health professionals frequently disagree about
the urgency of care in ED patients. When retrospective reviewers disagree with a prospective
assessment of urgency, the potential exists for denial of payment or even lawsuits.
Because the subjectivity of urgency definitions may increase disagreement, the development
of more objective and uniform definitions may help improve agreement.