Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cool Headed Individuals Are Better Survivors: Non-Consumptive and Consumptive Effects of a Generalist Predator on a Sap Feeding Insect

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Non-consumptive effects (NCEs) of predators are part of the complex interactions among insect natural enemies and prey. NCEs have been shown to significantly affect prey foraging and feeding. Leafhopper's (Auchenorrhyncha) lengthy phloem feeding bouts may play a role in pathogen transmission in vector species and also exposes them to predation risk. However, NCEs on leafhoppers have been scarcely studied, and we lack basic information about how anti-predator behaviour influences foraging and feeding in these species. Here we report a study on non-consumptive and consumptive predator-prey interactions in a naturally co-occurring spider–leafhopper system. In mesocosm arenas we studied movement patterns during foraging and feeding of the leafhopper Psammotettix alienus in the presence of the spider predator Tibellus oblongus. Leafhoppers delayed feeding and fed much less often when the spider was present. Foraging movement pattern changed under predation risk: movements became more frequent and brief. There was considerable individual variation in foraging movement activity. Those individuals that increased movement activity in the presence of predators exposed themselves to higher predation risk. However, surviving individuals exhibited a ‘cool headed’ reaction to spider presence by moving less than leafhoppers in control trials. No leafhoppers were preyed upon while feeding. We consider delayed feeding as a “paradoxical” antipredator tactic, since it is not necessarily an optimal strategy against a sit-and-wait generalist predator.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Predator hunting mode and habitat domain alter nonconsumptive effects in predator-prey interactions.

          Predators can affect prey populations through changes in traits that reduce predation risk. These trait changes (nonconsumptive effects, NCEs) can be energetically costly and cause reduced prey activity, growth, fecundity, and survival. The strength of nonconsumptive effects may vary with two functional characteristics of predators: hunting mode (actively hunting, sit-and-pursue, sit-and-wait) and habitat domain (the ability to pursue prey via relocation in space; can be narrow or broad). Specifically, cues from fairly stationary sit-and-wait and sit-and-pursue predators should be more indicative of imminent predation risk, and thereby evoke stronger NCEs, compared to cues from widely ranging actively hunting predators. Using a meta-analysis of 193 published papers, we found that cues from sit-and-pursue predators evoked stronger NCEs than cues from actively hunting predators. Predator habitat domain was less indicative of NCE strength, perhaps because habitat domain provides less reliable information regarding imminent risk to prey than does predator hunting mode. Given the importance of NCEs in determining the dynamics of prey communities, our findings suggest that predator characteristics may be used to predict how changing predator communities translate into changes in prey. Such knowledge may prove particularly useful given rates of local predator change due to habitat fragmentation and the introduction of novel predators.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Behavioural aspects influencing plant virus transmission by homopteran insects.

            Homopterans including aphids, whiteflies and leafhoppers are the major vectors of viruses comprising more than 80% of insect-transmitted viruses which represents close to 400 virus species within 39 different genera. Host plant recognition by homopterans requires a series of steps that are linked to plant virus transmission, including host searching or pre-alighting behaviour, probing on superficial tissues, settlement and stylet penetration to the target feeding tissues and salivation and continuous sap ingestion from the preferred feeding site. This review considers how vector behaviour influences the transmission and spread of plant viruses depending on the type of virus-vector relationship. Most studies have concentrated on aphid-transmitted viruses and particular probing and feeding behavioural processes and activities leading to the transmission of cuticula-borne and circulative viruses have been identified. The review also focuses on which are the most likely retention sites within the insect's body of cuticula-borne viruses. Finally, the influences of virus infection on vector behaviour such as changes in the attractiveness, settlement or feeding preference together with changes on vector performance (development, fecundity, rate of population increase and survival) are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fear of predation slows plant-litter decomposition.

              Aboveground consumers are believed to affect ecosystem functioning by regulating the quantity and quality of plant litter entering the soil. We uncovered a pathway whereby terrestrial predators regulate ecosystem processes via indirect control over soil community function. Grasshopper herbivores stressed by spider predators have a higher body carbon-to-nitrogen ratio than do grasshoppers raised without spiders. This change in elemental content does not slow grasshopper decomposition but perturbs belowground community function, decelerating the subsequent decomposition of plant litter. This legacy effect of predation on soil community function appears to be regulated by the amount of herbivore protein entering the soil.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                21 August 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 8
                : e0135954
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Zoology Department, Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
                [2 ]Institute for Plant Protection, Georgikon Faculty, University of Pannonia, Keszthely, Hungary
                [3 ]Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Science, Institute of Biology, Budapest, Hungary
                [4 ]Lendület Evolutionary Ecology Research Group, Plant Protection Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
                [5 ]Institute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Szent István University, Gödöllő, Hungary
                Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUNGARY
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: OB GT ZT VH ZM FS. Performed the experiments: OB GT. Analyzed the data: ZT FS. Wrote the paper: OB GT ZT VH ZM FS. Data management: FS. Arena design: VH GT.

                Article
                PONE-D-15-07820
                10.1371/journal.pone.0135954
                4546593
                26295476
                3f5829d2-d133-499c-a7dd-a2f5e5f4b24a
                Copyright @ 2015

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 20 February 2015
                : 28 July 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 4, Pages: 19
                Funding
                Funding for the study was provided by British Ecological Society Research grant ( http://www.britishecologicalsociety.org) 4768/5806 to FS and Országos Tudományos Kutatási Alapprogramok (K81971; www.otka.hu/en/) to FS. During the study, ZT was supported by the ‘Lendület’ programme of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA, LP2012-24/2012; www.mta.hu), Országos Tudományos Kutatási Alapprogramok grant (PD108938; www.otka.hu/en/) and the postdoctoral research programme of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (SZ-029/2013; www.mta.hu). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are available via Figshare ( http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1472880).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article