25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Receipt of Medications for Treatment of COVID-19 — United States, March 2020–August 2021

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The COVID-19 pandemic has magnified longstanding health care and social inequities, resulting in disproportionately high COVID-19–associated illness and death among members of racial and ethnic minority groups ( 1 ). Equitable use of effective medications ( 2 ) could reduce disparities in these severe outcomes ( 3 ). Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, initially received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in November 2020. mAbs are typically administered in an outpatient setting via intravenous infusion or subcutaneous injection and can prevent progression of COVID-19 if given after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result or for postexposure prophylaxis in patients at high risk for severe illness. † Dexamethasone, a commonly used steroid, and remdesivir, an antiviral drug that received EUA from FDA in May 2020, are used in inpatient settings and help prevent COVID-19 progression § ( 2 ). No large-scale studies have yet examined the use of mAb by race and ethnicity. Using COVID-19 patient electronic health record data from 41 U.S. health care systems that participated in the PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, ¶ this study assessed receipt of medications for COVID-19 treatment by race (White, Black, Asian, and Other races [including American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and multiple or Other races]) and ethnicity (Hispanic or non-Hispanic). Relative disparities in mAb** treatment among all patients †† (805,276) with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result and in dexamethasone and remdesivir treatment among inpatients §§ (120,204) with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result were calculated. Among all patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results, the overall use of mAb was infrequent, with mean monthly use at 4% or less for all racial and ethnic groups. Hispanic patients received mAb 58% less often than did non-Hispanic patients, and Black, Asian, or Other race patients received mAb 22%, 48%, and 47% less often, respectively, than did White patients during November 2020–August 2021. Among inpatients, disparities were different and of lesser magnitude: Hispanic inpatients received dexamethasone 6% less often than did non-Hispanic inpatients, and Black inpatients received remdesivir 9% more often than did White inpatients. Vaccines and preventive measures are the best defense against infection; use of COVID-19 medications postexposure or postinfection can reduce morbidity and mortality and relieve strain on hospitals but are not a substitute for COVID-19 vaccination. Public health policies and programs centered around the specific needs of communities can promote health equity ( 4 ). Equitable receipt of outpatient treatments, such as mAb and antiviral medications, and implementation of prevention practices are essential to reducing existing racial and ethnic inequities in severe COVID-19–associated illness and death. The PCORnet-distributed data infrastructure was queried, ¶¶ and 41 sites*** returned data on monthly receipt of medications for COVID-19 treatment during March 2020–August 2021. The monthly percentage of patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result who received mAb (November 2020–August 2021) and of inpatients with a SARS-CoV-2 positive test result who received dexamethasone or remdesivir (March 2020–August 2021) was calculated separately by race and by ethnicity (as aggregated in PCORnet) for adults aged ≥20 years. Differences in treatment by race and ethnicity were assessed in two ways. First, pairwise Wilcoxon signed rank tests, with p-values indicated as pw, were used to assess whether treatment receipt differed systematically over time (systematic temporal differences) by race or ethnicity. Second, relative monthly treatment disparities were calculated as the difference in percentage of patients treated between racial or ethnic minority (Black, Asian, Other for race; Hispanic ethnicity) and majority (White; non-Hispanic) groups divided by the percentage treated in the majority groups for each month. ††† The grand means (means of relative monthly treatment disparities) were calculated, and t-tests for statistical difference from zero, with p-values indicated as pt, were used to assess presence of overall relative treatment disparities. Results were considered statistically significant for p-values <0.05. GraphPad Prism software (version 9.3.0; GraphPad Software, Inc) was used for analyses and visualization. This activity was reviewed by CDC and conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy. §§§ During March 2020–August 2021, a total of 5,918,199 patients in PCORnet health care systems were tested ¶¶¶ for SARS-CoV-2, and 805,276 (13.6%) test results were positive (Table 1), representing approximately 3.0% of all positive results reported to CDC (Supplementary Table, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/113252). These patients are similar demographically to those included in CDC case data by age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Geographically, patients in the Census Pacific division are underrepresented whereas those in the Mountain division are overrepresented. Among patients with a positive test result, 2.9% were Asian, 15.7% Black, 61.2% White, and 10.9% Other race; 18.6% were Hispanic and 71.7% were non-Hispanic ethnicity (Table 1). Compared with all persons with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result, a higher proportion of patients with high-risk comorbidities**** were treated with mAb. Critical care †††† was required by 3.4% of all persons with positive test results compared with 1.8% of those treated with mAb. TABLE 1 Demographic and medical risk characteristics of patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results, by clinical setting and medications received — 41 health care systems in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, United States, March 2020–August 2021 Characteristic No. (%)* All patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 test result Patients receiving monoclonal antibodies Inpatients with positive SARS-CoV-2 test result Patients receiving dexamethasone Patients receiving remdesivir No. of unique patients 805,276 12,539 120,204 40,685 35,315 Demographics Age group, yrs 20–39 312,680 (38.8) 1,639 (13.1) 20,966 (17.4) 4,966 (12.2) 3,354 (9.5) 40–54 209,202 (26.0) 2,933 (23.4) 23,296 (19.4) 8,285 (20.4) 6,885 (19.5) 55–64 128,550 (16.0) 3,045 (24.3) 24,025 (20.0) 8,874 (21.8) 7,779 (22.0) 65–74 86,848 (10.8) 3,075 (24.5) 24,267 (20.2) 9,124 (22.4) 8,257 (23.4) 75–84 47,047 (5.8) 1,425 (11.4) 18,016 (15.0) 6,420 (15.8) 6,056 (17.1) ≥85 20,949 (2.6) 422 (3.4) 9,634 (8.0) 3,016 (7.4) 2,967 (8.4) Sex Female 437,651 (54.3) 6,709 (53.5) 59,583 (49.6) 19,262 (47.3) 16,607 (47.0) Male 367,359 (45.6) 5,828 (46.5) 60,603 (50.4) 21,416 (52.6) 18,704 (53.0) Other†/Missing§ 264 (0.0) 3 (0.0) 17 (0.0) 8 (0.0) 3 (0.0) Race Asian 22,968 (2.9) 206 (1.6) 4,396 (3.7) 1,219 (3.0) 1,003 (2.8) Black or African American 126,166 (15.7) 1,904 (15.2) 28,403 (23.6) 8,879 (21.8) 8,172 (23.1) White 493,181 (61.2) 9,366 (74.7) 59,212 (49.3) 22,910 (56.3) 19,318 (54.7) Other¶ 88,026 (10.9) 773 (6.2) 20,729 (17.2) 6,151 (15.1) 5,366 (15.2) Missing§ 74,935 (9.3) 280 (2.2) 7,449 (6.2) 1,511 (3.7) 1,443 (4.1) Ethnicity Hispanic 149,565 (18.6) 1,006 (8.0) 25,953 (21.6) 7,557 (18.6) 6,895 (19.5) Non-Hispanic 577,394 (71.7) 11,189 (89.2) 88,007 (73.2) 31,627 (77.7) 27,147 (76.9) Other** 5,553 (0.7) 20 (0.2) 273 (0.2) 84 (0.2) 104 (0.3) Missing§ 72,764 (9.0) 318 (2.5) 5,955 (5.0) 1,410 (3.5) 1,161 (3.3) Medical conditions associated with high risk†† Anemia 72,830 (9.0) 2,187 (17.4) 33,072 (27.5) 9,762 (24.0) 8,553 (24.2) Arrythmia 73,318 (9.1) 2,527 (20.2) 39,255 (32.7) 12,235 (30.1) 10,828 (30.7) Asthma 60,080 (7.5) 1,890 (15.1) 16,045 (13.3) 5,301 (13.0) 4,944 (14.0) COPD 26,636 (3.3) 879 (7.0) 15,330 (12.8) 5,551 (13.6) 5,513 (15.6) Cancer 37,027 (4.6) 1,641 (13.1) 12,869 (10.7) 4,716 (11.6) 3,605 (10.2) Chronic kidney disease 50,580 (6.3) 1,795 (14.3) 30,206 (25.1) 9,269 (22.8) 8,418 (23.8) Chronic pulmonary disorders 100,625 (12.5) 3,219 (25.7) 32,617 (27.1) 11,282 (27.7) 10,582 (30.0) Coagulopathy 33,374 (4.1) 985 (7.9) 23,070 (19.2) 7,442 (18.3) 6,469 (18.3) Congestive heart failure 40,179 (5.0) 1,344 (10.7) 24,627 (20.5) 7,868 (19.3) 7,329 (20.8) Coronary artery disease 54,051 (6.7) 2,074 (16.5) 28,799 (24.0) 9,305 (22.9) 8,607 (24.4) Diabetes type 2 107,527 (13.4) 3,890 (31.0) 47,963 (39.9) 15,462 (38.0) 14,706 (41.6) Hypertension 209,848 (26.1) 7,265 (57.9) 78,700 (65.5) 25,653 (63.1) 23,633 (66.9) Mental health disorders 97,046 (12.1) 2,728 (21.8) 26,443 (22.0) 8,015 (19.7) 7,044 (19.9) Peripheral vascular disorders 31,930 (4.0) 1,250 (10.0) 16,496 (13.7) 5,373 (13.2) 4,596 (13.0) Severe obesity (BMI ≥40 kg/m2) 60,052 (7.5) 2,430 (19.4) 20,271 (16.9) 7,781 (19.1) 6,891 (19.5) Outcome §§ Critical care 27,585 (3.4) 225 (1.8) 21,412 (17.8) 10,675 (26.2) 8,244 (23.3) Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; CDM = common data model; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PCORnet = National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network. * Percentages are simple summary numbers (column percentages) out of the total in each category. Strata are not expected to sum to the total because the small cell masking by the data partners before submission of data. † For sex stratifications, Other includes all remaining PCORnet CDM values that are not male or female. § For sex, race, and ethnicity stratifications, Missing includes PCORnet CDM values of Refuse to answer, No Information, Unknown, and missing values. ¶ For race stratifications, Other includes PCORnet CDM values of Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska Native, Multiple races, and Other. ** For ethnicity stratifications, Other includes PCORnet CDM values of Other. †† Recorded history of the diagnoses in electronic health record (outpatient or inpatient) within 3 years before a positive test. Patients can have more than one condition. §§ Fourteen days before to 30 days after a positive test result. Mean monthly mAb use among all patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results who were White, Black, Asian, or Other race was 4.0%, 2.8%, 2.2%, and 2.2%, respectively; among patients of Hispanic or non-Hispanic ethnicity, mAb use was 1.8% and 4.0%, respectively. Patients who were Black, Asian, or Other race received mAb 22.4%, 48.3%, and 46.5%, respectively, less often than did White patients (Table 2); systematic temporal differences in mAb receipt were observed by race (all pw<0.01) (Figure). SARS-CoV-2 positive patients of Hispanic ethnicity received mAb 57.7% less often (pt<0.001) than did non-Hispanic patients; systematic temporal differences in mAb receipt were observed by ethnicity (pw = 0.002). TABLE 2 Average monthly frequency and relative disparity in receipt of medications for treatment of COVID-19, by race and ethnicity — 41 health care systems in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, United States, March 2020–August 2021 Treatment/Race and ethnicity Total no. eligible for treatment* Total no. (%) treated Mean of monthly percentage treated† pw † Mean of monthly relative disparity,§ % (95% CI) pt § Monoclonal antibodies (November 2020–August 2021) Race White 334,472 9,366 (2.8) 4.0 — Ref. — Black 73,853 1,904 (2.6) 2.8 0.004 −22.4 (−38.7 to −6.1) 0.0125 Asian 14,744 206 (1.4) 2.2 0.002 −48.3 (−63.1 to −33.6) <0.0001 Other 45,521 773 (1.7) 2.2 0.002 −46.5 (−51.1 to −41.9) <0.0001 Ethnicity Non-Hispanic 577,394 11,189 (1.9) 4.0 — Ref. — Hispanic 149,565 1,006 (0.7) 1.8 0.002 −57.7 (−66.6 to −48.9) <0.0001 Dexamethasone (March 2020–August 2021) Race White 59,212 22,910 (38.7) 35.8 — Ref. — Black 28,403 8,879 (31.3) 33.8 0.024 −1.9 (−7.8 to 3.9) 0.498 Asian 4,396 1,219 (27.7) 31.4 0.020 −2.0 (−17.3 to 13.2) 0.782 Other 20,729 6,151 (29.7) 34.2 0.106 −1.3 (−9.1 to 6.6) 0.735 Ethnicity Non-Hispanic 88,007 31,627 (35.9) 35.4 — Ref. — Hispanic 25,953 7,557 (29.1) 32.5 0.005 −6.2 (−11.7 to −0.6) 0.032 Remdesivir (March 2020–August 2021) Race White 59,212 19,318 (32.6) 29.0 — Ref. — Black 28,403 8,172 (28.8) 31.2 0.028 9.3 (0.9 to 17.7) 0.032 Asian 4,396 1,003 (22.8) 26.2 0.200 −15.1 (−30.3 to 0.1) 0.052 Other 20,729 5,366 (25.9) 30.6 0.323 1.7 (−9.4 to 12.8) 0.748 Ethnicity Non-Hispanic 88,007 27,147 (30.8) 29.3 — Ref. — Hispanic 25,953 6,895 (26.6) 30.4 0.423 8.8 (−0.4 to 18.0) 0.060 Abbreviation: Ref. = referent group. * For monoclonal antibody therapy, all patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result were considered eligible for treatment. For dexamethasone and remdesivir, inpatients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result were considered eligible for treatment. † Mean of monthly treated time series tested for differences using pairwise Wilcoxon signed rank tests with p value given as pw. Mean of monthly percent treated = [(n treated / n eligible)March 2020 + (n treated / n eligible)April 2020 + . . . (n treated / n eligible)August 2021] / n total no. months. § The difference in percentage of patients treated among racial (Black, Asian, or Other races) or ethnic minority (Hispanic) and majority (White or non-Hispanic) groups divided by the percentage treated in the majority groups for each month. Assessed as nonzero using t tests with p-value given as pt. Total number of months for dexamethasone and remdesivir = 18 and for monoclonal antibodies = 10. Mean of monthly relative disparity, % = [(Minority − majority / Majority)March2020 + (minority − majority / Majority)April 2020 . . . + (Minority − majority / Majority)August 2021] / Total no. of months. FIGURE Monthly* percentage of COVID-19 patients (n = 805,276) receiving monoclonal antibody treatment,† by race§ and ethnicity¶ — 41 health care systems in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network — United States, November 2020–August 2021 * Systematic temporal differences in medication receipt by race and ethnicity were assessed by pairwise Wilcoxon signed rank test. † mAbs require administration by intravenous infusion or subcutaneous injection. § White race is the referent group; p-values for Black, Asian, and Other races are 0.004, 0.002, and 0.002, respectively. ¶ Non-Hispanic ethnicity is the referent group; p = 0.002 for Hispanic ethnicity. The figure comprises two line graphs illustrating the monthly percentage of COVID-19 patients receiving monoclonal antibody treatment, stratified by race and ethnicity, according to 41 health care systems participating in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network in the United States during March 2020–August 2021. Mean monthly dexamethasone use among inpatients who were White, Black, Asian, or Other race was 35.8%, 33.8%, 31.4%, and 34.2%, respectively; among patients of Hispanic or non-Hispanic ethnicity, dexamethasone use was 32.5% and 35.4%, respectively. Relative disparities in dexamethasone receipt by race were not statistically significant (Table 2); however, small but systematic temporal differences in dexamethasone receipt were observed among White inpatients and Black, and Asian inpatients (both pw<0.05) (Supplementary Figure, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/113252). Hispanic inpatients were treated with dexamethasone 6.2% less often than were non-Hispanic inpatients and systematic temporal treatment differences were also observed (pw = 0.005). Mean monthly remdesivir use among inpatients who were White, Black, Asian, or Other race was 29.0%, 31.2%, 26.2%, and 30.6%, respectively; among patients of Hispanic or non-Hispanic ethnicity, remdesivir use was 30.4% and 29.3%, respectively. Black inpatients received remdesivir 9.3% more often (pt = 0.03) than did White inpatients; systematic temporal differences were also observed (pw = 0.03). Asian, Other race, and Hispanic inpatients did not experience significant relative disparities or systematic temporal differences in remdesivir treatment compared with White and non-Hispanic inpatients. Discussion This large-scale study from 41 U.S. health care systems found disparate mAb treatment of COVID-19 in Hispanic, Black, Asian, and Other race patients relative to non-Hispanic and White patients. Large relative differences were noted for mAb treatment, yet absolute differences were small. Relative differences in treatment with dexamethasone and remdesivir were less apparent in hospital settings, which might be attributed to ease of medication access. mAb treatment must be administered by intravenous infusion or subcutaneous injection by a health care provider, typically in outpatient settings, soon after receipt of a positive test result and within 10 days of symptom onset. The finding of mAb treatment disparities is consistent with previous studies. A single-center study of kidney transplant patients found that Black and Hispanic patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 were less likely to receive mAb and more likely to be hospitalized ( 5 ). The current study did not identify the underlying causes for the observed disparities. mAb treatment disparities might reflect systemic factors such as limited access to testing and care because of availability constraints, inadequate insurance coverage, and transportation challenges; lack of a primary care provider to recommend treatment; variations in treatment supply and distribution; potential biases in prescribing practices; and limited penetration of messaging in some communities about mAb availability and effectiveness to prevent disease progression. Additional reasons might include hesitancy about receiving treatment; a previous study found patients who were non-Hispanic White and English-speaking accepted mAb treatment more often than did those who were non-White and Hispanic ( 6 ). In inpatient settings, Black inpatients received remdesivir more often, and Black, Asian, and Hispanic inpatients received dexamethasone less often than did comparison groups. This could indicate racial and ethnic differences in clinical indications for medication use (e.g., age distribution and prevalence of comorbidities) or could be reflective of varying prescribing practices, protocols, and drug access by institutions that serve populations of different racial and ethnic distributions ( 7 ). mAbs are authorized for use in persons at high-risk for severe COVID-19 with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results and as postexposure prophylaxis. In this study, a larger percentage of patients who received mAb had high-risk medical conditions, in accordance with current treatment guidelines. However, this study also found mAb treatments have been used relatively less commonly in racial and ethnic minority groups, amplifying the increased risk for severe COVID-19–associated outcomes, including death among these groups, as a consequence of their higher prevalence of preexisting conditions. §§§§ Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 treatment requires patient and clinician awareness of the problem and its solutions; resources; and action from government, private entities, and community- and faith-based organizations to implement effective interventions. Bringing health care to populations facing barriers in access to mAb via a mobile infusion unit or via telehealth providers has been shown to increase mAb use, decrease severe outcomes, and reduce costs ( 8 , 9 ). These examples of meeting persons in community venues can be helpful in delivering outpatient treatments, addressing pandemic disparities, and managing underlying chronic conditions affected by social determinants of health. ¶¶¶¶ Moreover, disparities in COVID-19 treatment are the latest example of longstanding unequal treatment of many medical conditions.***** Multicomponent, multisystem programs and policies can support health equity. ††††† One such program is the COVID Response and Resilient Communities initiative, which places community health workers in communities to reduce long-standing disparities and deliver interventions to manage COVID-19. §§§§§ Future studies of COVID-19 treatment disparities should account for persons with high-risk conditions and include newer medications, such as the oral antiviral agents Paxlovid and molnupiravir, as well as sotrovimab, ¶¶¶¶¶ which is the only mAb treatment currently available for early treatment of patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant.****** The findings in this report are subject to at least five limitations. First, the aggregate data structure did not allow for adjustment of demographic or clinical factors that might be correlated with race and ethnicity. Second, all patients with a positive test result were used as the denominator for calculations of mAb treatment proportions because persons at risk for progression to severe illness could not be identified in aggregate data. Percentage use might be higher and relative disparities might be different if the denominator were specific to mAb prescribing guidelines. Third, missing race and ethnicity was more common among all patients with positive test results than among those treated; more work is needed to fully understand the implications of missing or inaccurate data ( 10 ). Fourth, mAb use was captured solely from electronic health records; disparities noted here might be restricted to patients who received mAb within a health care system because treatment received in non–health care settings (e.g., government-run infusion sites) is not likely to be recorded. Finally, PCORnet data are derived from a convenience sample of health care facilities, limiting generalizability to the U.S. population. The COVID-19 pandemic has magnified and amplified inequities that must be addressed to achieve equitable health outcomes. The United States has surpassed 800,000 deaths from COVID-19 and is experiencing another case surge caused by Omicron. †††††† Vaccines and preventive measures are the best defense against infection; postinfection, COVID-19 medications reduce morbidity and mortality and relieve strain on hospitals. A lower proportion of persons of racial and ethnic minority groups received mAb outpatient treatment for preventing severe COVID-19. This finding highlights disparities as a priority for intervention and can guide strategies aimed at more equitable COVID-19 outcomes. Policies, resources, and programs addressing the specific needs of served populations, institutions, and places can accelerate progress towards health equity ( 4 ). Strategizing the equitable receipt of current and emerging outpatient treatments §§§§§§ by reducing barriers to accessing treatment might prevent disparities in severe COVID-19 outcomes. Efforts to reduce racial and ethnic disparities with equitable outpatient COVID-19 treatment access, practices, and supportive systems are urgently needed. Summary What is already known about this topic? Racial and ethnic disparities in SARS-CoV-2 infection risk and death from COVID-19 have been well documented. What is added by this report? Analysis of data from 41 health care systems participating in the PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, found lower use of monoclonal antibody treatment among Black, Asian, and Other race and Hispanic patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results, relative to White and non-Hispanic patients. Racial and ethnic differences were smaller for inpatient administration of remdesivir and dexamethasone. What are the implications for public health practice? Equitable receipt of COVID-19 treatments by race and ethnicity along with vaccines and other prevention practices are essential to reduce inequities in severe COVID-19–associated illness and death.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19 — Preliminary Report

          Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is associated with diffuse lung damage. Glucocorticoids may modulate inflammation-mediated lung injury and thereby reduce progression to respiratory failure and death. Methods In this controlled, open-label trial comparing a range of possible treatments in patients who were hospitalized with Covid-19, we randomly assigned patients to receive oral or intravenous dexamethasone (at a dose of 6 mg once daily) for up to 10 days or to receive usual care alone. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Here, we report the preliminary results of this comparison. Results A total of 2104 patients were assigned to receive dexamethasone and 4321 to receive usual care. Overall, 482 patients (22.9%) in the dexamethasone group and 1110 patients (25.7%) in the usual care group died within 28 days after randomization (age-adjusted rate ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 0.93; P<0.001). The proportional and absolute between-group differences in mortality varied considerably according to the level of respiratory support that the patients were receiving at the time of randomization. In the dexamethasone group, the incidence of death was lower than that in the usual care group among patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (29.3% vs. 41.4%; rate ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.81) and among those receiving oxygen without invasive mechanical ventilation (23.3% vs. 26.2%; rate ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94) but not among those who were receiving no respiratory support at randomization (17.8% vs. 14.0%; rate ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.55). Conclusions In patients hospitalized with Covid-19, the use of dexamethasone resulted in lower 28-day mortality among those who were receiving either invasive mechanical ventilation or oxygen alone at randomization but not among those receiving no respiratory support. (Funded by the Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research and others; RECOVERY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04381936; ISRCTN number, 50189673.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Rates of COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization, Intensive Care Unit Admission, and In-Hospital Death in the United States From March 2020 to February 2021

            Question Are rates of COVID-19–associated hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or in-hospital death higher among individuals who belong to racial and ethnic minority groups compared with those who identify as non-Hispanic White? Findings In this cross-sectional study of 143 342 individuals hospitalized with COVID-19, non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native, Hispanic or Latino, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander persons were more likely to have a COVID-19-associated hospitalization, ICU admission, or in-hospital death compared with non-Hispanic White individuals during the first year of the pandemic. Meaning In this study, US residents who belong to racial and ethnic minority groups experienced severe COVID-19–associated outcomes disproportionately; equitable access to preventive measures, such as COVID-19 vaccines, is needed for these populations. This cross-sectional study evaluates whether rates of COVID-19–associated hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, or in-hospital death are higher among racial and ethnic minority groups compared with non-Hispanic White persons. Importance Racial and ethnic minority groups are disproportionately affected by COVID-19. Objectives To evaluate whether rates of severe COVID-19, defined as hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or in-hospital death, are higher among racial and ethnic minority groups compared with non-Hispanic White persons. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study included 99 counties within 14 US states participating in the COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network. Participants were persons of all ages hospitalized with COVID-19 from March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021. Exposures Laboratory-confirmed COVID-19–associated hospitalization, defined as a positive SARS-CoV-2 test within 14 days prior to or during hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures Cumulative age-adjusted rates (per 100 000 population) of hospitalization, ICU admission, and death by race and ethnicity. Rate ratios (RR) were calculated for each racial and ethnic group compared with White persons. Results Among 153 692 patients with COVID-19–associated hospitalizations, 143 342 (93.3%) with information on race and ethnicity were included in the analysis. Of these, 105 421 (73.5%) were 50 years or older, 72 159 (50.3%) were male, 28 762 (20.1%) were Hispanic or Latino, 2056 (1.4%) were non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native, 7737 (5.4%) were non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander, 40 806 (28.5%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 63 981 (44.6%) were White. Compared with White persons, American Indian or Alaska Native, Latino, Black, and Asian or Pacific Islander persons were more likely to have higher cumulative age-adjusted rates of hospitalization, ICU admission, and death as follows: American Indian or Alaska Native (hospitalization: RR, 3.70; 95% CI, 3.54-3.87; ICU admission: RR, 6.49; 95% CI, 6.01-7.01; death: RR, 7.19; 95% CI, 6.47-7.99); Latino (hospitalization: RR, 3.06; 95% CI, 3.01-3.10; ICU admission: RR, 4.20; 95% CI, 4.08-4.33; death: RR, 3.85; 95% CI, 3.68-4.01); Black (hospitalization: RR, 2.85; 95% CI, 2.81-2.89; ICU admission: RR, 3.17; 95% CI, 3.09-3.26; death: RR, 2.58; 95% CI, 2.48-2.69); and Asian or Pacific Islander (hospitalization: RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06; ICU admission: RR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.83-1.98; death: RR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.55-1.74). Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional analysis, American Indian or Alaska Native, Latino, Black, and Asian or Pacific Islander persons were more likely than White persons to have a COVID-19–associated hospitalization, ICU admission, or in-hospital death during the first year of the US COVID-19 pandemic. Equitable access to COVID-19 preventive measures, including vaccination, is needed to minimize the gap in racial and ethnic disparities of severe COVID-19.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Use of anti‐spike monoclonal antibodies in kidney transplant recipients with COVID‐19: Efficacy, ethnic and racial disparities

              Organ transplant recipients may not mount an adequate immune response to COVID‐19 infection and therefore may benefit greatly from passive immunization with anti‐spike monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which have been shown to decrease hospitalization rates in the general outpatient population. We evaluated the efficacy of mAb therapy in decreasing hospitalizations or emergency room (ER) visits among kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with COVID‐19. We identified KTR with COVID‐19 between March 1, 2020 and April 30, 2021. Patients were excluded if they had multi‐organ transplant or hospital‐acquired COVID‐19. We studied 95 KTR; 20 received mAb. mAb administration was associated with a significant decrease in hospitalizations or ER visits (15% vs. 76%, p  < 0.001). This association remained significant after adjustment for potential confounders, and analysis of mAb administration as a time‐dependent variable, with day of symptom onset as day 1 (adjusted HR 0.216, p  = 0.04). Black or Hispanic patients were less likely to receive mAb and more likely to be admitted to the hospital or visit the ER. In our KTR population, mAb therapy for COVID‐19 may have helped decrease hospitalizations and ER visits. Healthcare inequities, including access to investigational treatments, have been exacerbated by the COVID‐19 pandemic. Antiviral mAbs are a promising therapeutic modality, especially for immunocompromised patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                WR
                Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
                Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                0149-2195
                1545-861X
                21 January 2022
                21 January 2022
                : 71
                : 3
                : 96-102
                Affiliations
                CDC COVID-19 Response Team; Department of Infectious Diseases, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, Jefferson, Louisiana; Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Louisiana Public Health Institute, New Orleans, Louisiana; College of Medicine and College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Center for Health Equity and Innovation, Cook County Health, Chicago, Illinois; Section of Pulmonary Diseases, Critical Care, and Environmental Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana; Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Jennifer L. Wiltz, igc2@ 123456cdc.gov .
                Article
                mm7103e1
                10.15585/mmwr.mm7103e1
                8774154
                35051133
                3f527fed-de8c-4fba-9206-2763ea99cc17

                All material in the MMWR Series is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated.

                History
                Categories
                Full Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article