23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      GIS-based groundwater potential mapping using boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and random forest machine learning models in Iran.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Groundwater is considered one of the most valuable fresh water resources. The main objective of this study was to produce groundwater spring potential maps in the Koohrang Watershed, Chaharmahal-e-Bakhtiari Province, Iran, using three machine learning models: boosted regression tree (BRT), classification and regression tree (CART), and random forest (RF). Thirteen hydrological-geological-physiographical (HGP) factors that influence locations of springs were considered in this research. These factors include slope degree, slope aspect, altitude, topographic wetness index (TWI), slope length (LS), plan curvature, profile curvature, distance to rivers, distance to faults, lithology, land use, drainage density, and fault density. Subsequently, groundwater spring potential was modeled and mapped using CART, RF, and BRT algorithms. The predicted results from the three models were validated using the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC). From 864 springs identified, 605 (≈70 %) locations were used for the spring potential mapping, while the remaining 259 (≈30 %) springs were used for the model validation. The area under the curve (AUC) for the BRT model was calculated as 0.8103 and for CART and RF the AUC were 0.7870 and 0.7119, respectively. Therefore, it was concluded that the BRT model produced the best prediction results while predicting locations of springs followed by CART and RF models, respectively. Geospatially integrated BRT, CART, and RF methods proved to be useful in generating the spring potential map (SPM) with reasonable accuracy.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Environ Monit Assess
          Environmental monitoring and assessment
          Springer Nature
          1573-2959
          0167-6369
          Jan 2016
          : 188
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Watershed Management Engineering, College of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Mazandaran, Iran.
          [2 ] Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Engineering, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. hr.pourghasemi@shirazu.ac.ir.
          [3 ] Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Geography, University of South Florida, Saint Petersburg, FL, USA.
          Article
          10.1007/s10661-015-5049-6
          10.1007/s10661-015-5049-6
          26687087
          3f3ef7b9-149b-4668-acef-3a6afc738bc8
          History

          Spring potential mapping,Random forest,Iran,GIS,Classification and regression tree,Boosted regression tree

          Comments

          Comment on this article