4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Chronic Diseases and Associated Risk Factors Among Adults in Puerto Rico After Hurricane Maria

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          What was the prevalence of chronic diseases and their associated risk factors among adults living in Puerto Rico before and after Hurricane Maria?

          Findings

          This cross-sectional study using data from 825 participants in 2 studies conducted in 2015 and 2019 found statistically significantly higher prevalence of unhealthy lifestyle behaviors and multiple chronic conditions among adults in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria. Higher social support, lower depressive symptoms, and lower perceived stress were observed after the hurricane.

          Meaning

          These findings suggest that as public health emergencies upsurge, continuous efforts will be necessary to sustain healthy behaviors, positive emotional health, and low rates of chronic diseases.

          Abstract

          This cross-sectional study assesses the prevalence of chronic diseases and their associated risk factors among adults living in Puerto Rico before vs after Hurricane Maria.

          Abstract

          Importance

          As public health emergencies become more prevalent, it is crucial to identify adverse physical and mental health conditions that may be triggered by natural disasters. There is a lack of data on whether Hurricane Maria in 2017 influenced the disease burden of adults in Puerto Rico.

          Objective

          To estimate the prevalence of chronic diseases and their associated risk factors among adults living in Puerto Rico before and after Hurricane Maria in 2017.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This cross-sectional study used data from 2 previous cross-sectional studies, including the pre–Hurricane Maria Puerto Rico Assessment on Diet, Lifestyles and Disease (PRADLAD) study, conducted in 2015, and the post–Hurricane Maria Puerto Rico Observational Study of Psychosocial, Environmental, and Chronic Disease Trends (PROSPECT), conducted in 2019. Participants included adults aged 30 to 75 years residing in Puerto Rico. Data were analyzed from April to October 2020.

          Exposures

          Self-reported data were obtained on sociodemographic, lifestyle, and psychosocial factors and medically diagnosed conditions using validated questionnaires. Anthropometrics were measured in triplicate.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Data were obtained using similar protocols in both studies. Characteristics were contrasted for all participants across studies and for 87 PRADLAD participants who returned to PROSPECT.

          Results

          A total of 825 participants from both cohorts were included, with 380 PRADLAD participants and 532 PROSPECT participants. In the 2019 PROSPECT study, the mean (SD) age was 53.7 (10.8) years, and 363 participants (68.2%) were assigned female at birth and 169 participants (31.8%) were assigned male at birth. In the 2019 cohort, 360 participants (67.7%) had college education or higher, 205 participants (38.5%) reported annual income greater than $20 001, and 263 participants (49.5%) were employed. Most sociodemographic variables were similar between studies, except for higher income and employment after the hurricane. In the main analysis, participants in 2019, compared with participants in 2015, had higher abdominal obesity (389 participants [73.2%] vs 233 participants [61.3%]), sedentarism (236 participants [44.4%] vs 136 participants [35.8%]), binge drinking (95 participants [17.9%] vs 46 participants [12.1%]), and social support (mean [SD] score, 26.9 [7.2] vs 24.7 [7.1]) but lower depressive symptoms (169 participants [31.7%] vs 200 participants [52.6%]) and perceived stress (mean [SD] score, 19.3 [9.5] vs 21.7 [7.7]). In 2019, compared with 2015, there were higher rates of hypertension (252 participants [47.3%] vs 149 participants [39.2%]), arthritis (172 participants [32.3%] vs 97 participants [25.6%]), high cholesterol (194 participants [36.4%] vs 90 participants [23.8%]), high triglycerides (123 participants [23.1%] vs 56 participants [14.7%]), eye disease (94 participants [17.6%] vs 48 participants [12.7%]), fatty liver disease (68 participants [12.8%] vs 29 participants [7.5%]), and osteoporosis (74 participants [13.9%] vs 20 participants [5.2%]). Secondary analysis for the 87 returning participants showed similar results.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this cross-sectional study, a higher prevalence of unhealthy behaviors and chronic conditions was noted among adults in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria, warranting long-term studies. Psychosocial factors were better, but still need attention. As natural disasters intensify, efforts should focus on continuous surveillance of health outcomes and promoting healthy behaviors, positive emotional health, and disease control, particularly in populations with higher risk for poor health.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population

          L Radloff (1977)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Global Measure of Perceived Stress

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Mental Health Consequences of Disasters

              We present in this review the current state of disaster mental health research. In particular, we provide an overview of research on the presentation, burden, correlates, and treatment of mental disorders following disasters. We also describe challenges to studying the mental health consequences of disasters and discuss the limitations in current methodologies. Finally, we offer directions for future disaster mental health research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                12 January 2022
                January 2022
                12 January 2022
                : 5
                : 1
                : e2139986
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
                [2 ]Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
                [3 ]FDI Clinical Research of Puerto Rico, San Juan
                [4 ]McLaren Health Care, Graduate Medical Education, Grand Blanc, Michigan
                [5 ]College of Fine Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Lowell
                [6 ]Department of Biomedical and Nutritional Sciences and Center for Population Health, University of Massachusetts, Lowell
                [7 ]Department of Biochemistry, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: October 22, 2021.
                Published: January 12, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39986
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 Mattei J et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Josiemer Mattei, PhD, MPH, Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Ave, Boston MA 02115 ( jmattei@ 123456hsph.harvard.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Mattei and Tamez had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs Mattei and Tamez contributed equally to the manuscript as co–first authors.
                Concept and design: Mattei, O’Neill, Lopez-Cepero, Tucker, Rodriguez-Orengo.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Mattei, Tamez, O’Neill, Haneuse, Mendoza, Orozco, Lopez-Cepero, Rios-Bedoya, Falcon, Tucker.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Mattei, Tamez, O’Neill.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Tamez, Haneuse, Orozco.
                Obtained funding: Mattei, Rios-Bedoya, Falcon, Rodriguez-Orengo.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Mattei, O’Neill, Mendoza, Rodriguez-Orengo.
                Supervision: Mattei, Mendoza, Rodriguez-Orengo.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Mattei reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation during the conduct of the study and providing professional services for Dove Self-Esteem Project, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, and Ponce Medical School Foundation outside the submitted work. Dr Mendoza reported receiving grants from NIH outside the submitted work. Dr Rios-Bedoya reported receiving grants from FDI Clinical Research during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: PRADLAD was supported by private anonymous donations to Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, a Dry Bean Health Research Program Incentive Award from the Northarvest Bean Growers Association, institutional funds from FDI Clinical Research, and NIH National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (grant No. K01-HL120951 [Dr Mattei]). PROSPECT was supported by the NIH National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (grant No. R01-HL143792 and K01-HL120951 [Dr Mattei]) and National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (grant No. R21-MD013650 [Dr Mattei]) and a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Culture of Health Leaders Award (Dr Mattei). Dr. Tamez received grant support from the NIH (grant No. T32-HL098048).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Article
                zoi211123
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39986
                8756309
                35019984
                3cc6f534-61f8-42b5-80a9-c03986b779af
                Copyright 2022 Mattei J et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 23 July 2021
                : 22 October 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Public Health

                Comments

                Comment on this article