78
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Diagnostic value of plasma phosphorylated tau181 in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration

      research-article
      , MS 1 , 2 , , PhD 1 , , BS 1 , , BS 1 , , MS 1 , , PhD 1 , , BA 1 , , PhD 1 , , PhD 1 , , MD, PhD 1 , , MD, PhD 1 , , MD 3 , , BS 3 , , PhD 3 , , PhD 3 , , PhD 3 , , MD 3 , , MD, PhD 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , , MD, PhD 4 , 5 , , BA 1 , , PhD 2 , , PsyD 1 , , MD, PhD 1 , 8 , , MD 1 , 8 , , MD 1 , , MD 9 , , MD 1 , , MD 1 , 10 , , PhD 3 , , MD, PhD 1 , , MD, PhD 1 , a
      Nature medicine

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          With the potential development of new disease-modifying Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) therapies, simple, widely available screening tests are needed to identify which individuals who are experiencing symptoms of cognitive or behavioral decline should be further evaluated for initiation of treatment. A blood-based test for AD would be a less invasive and less expensive screening tool than the currently approved CSF or amyloid β-PET diagnostic tests. We examined whether plasma phosphorylated tau at residue 181 (pTau181) could differentiate between clinically diagnosed or autopsy confirmed AD and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD). Plasma pTau181 concentrations were increased by 3.5 fold in AD compared to controls and differentiated AD from both clinically diagnosed (Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve [AUC]=0.894) and autopsy confirmed FTLD (AUC=0.878). Plasma pTau181 identified amyloid β-PET positive individuals regardless of clinical diagnosis and correlated with cortical tau protein deposition measured by 18F-Flortaucipir PET. Plasma pTau181 may be useful to screen for tau pathology associated with AD.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease

          The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association charged a workgroup with the task of revising the 1984 criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia. The workgroup sought to ensure that the revised criteria would be flexible enough to be used by both general healthcare providers without access to neuropsychological testing, advanced imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid measures, and specialized investigators involved in research or in clinical trial studies who would have these tools available. We present criteria for all-cause dementia and for AD dementia. We retained the general framework of probable AD dementia from the 1984 criteria. On the basis of the past 27 years of experience, we made several changes in the clinical criteria for the diagnosis. We also retained the term possible AD dementia, but redefined it in a manner more focused than before. Biomarker evidence was also integrated into the diagnostic formulations for probable and possible AD dementia for use in research settings. The core clinical criteria for AD dementia will continue to be the cornerstone of the diagnosis in clinical practice, but biomarker evidence is expected to enhance the pathophysiological specificity of the diagnosis of AD dementia. Much work lies ahead for validating the biomarker diagnosis of AD dementia. Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes

            Eighty-three brains obtained at autopsy from nondemented and demented individuals were examined for extracellular amyloid deposits and intraneuronal neurofibrillary changes. The distribution pattern and packing density of amyloid deposits turned out to be of limited significance for differentiation of neuropathological stages. Neurofibrillary changes occurred in the form of neuritic plaques, neurofibrillary tangles and neuropil threads. The distribution of neuritic plaques varied widely not only within architectonic units but also from one individual to another. Neurofibrillary tangles and neuropil threads, in contrast, exhibited a characteristic distribution pattern permitting the differentiation of six stages. The first two stages were characterized by an either mild or severe alteration of the transentorhinal layer Pre-alpha (transentorhinal stages I-II). The two forms of limbic stages (stages III-IV) were marked by a conspicuous affection of layer Pre-alpha in both transentorhinal region and proper entorhinal cortex. In addition, there was mild involvement of the first Ammon's horn sector. The hallmark of the two isocortical stages (stages V-VI) was the destruction of virtually all isocortical association areas. The investigation showed that recognition of the six stages required qualitative evaluation of only a few key preparations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease

              The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association charged a workgroup with the task of developing criteria for the symptomatic predementia phase of Alzheimer's disease (AD), referred to in this article as mild cognitive impairment due to AD. The workgroup developed the following two sets of criteria: (1) core clinical criteria that could be used by healthcare providers without access to advanced imaging techniques or cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and (2) research criteria that could be used in clinical research settings, including clinical trials. The second set of criteria incorporate the use of biomarkers based on imaging and cerebrospinal fluid measures. The final set of criteria for mild cognitive impairment due to AD has four levels of certainty, depending on the presence and nature of the biomarker findings. Considerable work is needed to validate the criteria that use biomarkers and to standardize biomarker analysis for use in community settings. Copyright © 2011 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9502015
                8791
                Nat Med
                Nat. Med.
                Nature medicine
                1078-8956
                1546-170X
                14 January 2020
                02 March 2020
                March 2020
                02 September 2020
                : 26
                : 3
                : 387-397
                Affiliations
                [1. ]Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
                [2. ]Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Neuroscience, The Netherlands
                [3. ]Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
                [4. ]Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
                [5. ]Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
                [6. ]Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
                [7. ]UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, United Kingdom
                [8. ]Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
                [9. ]Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
                [10. ]Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
                Author notes
                [a ]To whom correspondence should be addressed: 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Suite 190, MC 1207, San Francisco, CA, 94158, adam.boxer@ 123456ucsf.edu

                Author contributions:

                E.H.T. and J.C.R. had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

                Concept and design: E.H.T., J.L.D, J.C.R., A.L.B.

                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

                Drafting of the manuscript: E.H.T.

                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: E.H.T., R.L.J., J.L.D., J.C.R., A.L.B.

                Statistical analysis: E.H.T., R.L.J., P.W., D.C.A., J.C.R.

                Obtained funding: A.L.B., B.F.B., H.R., B.L.M., G.D.R., J.H.K., J.L.D.

                Supervision: J.L.D., J.C.R., A.L.B.

                Article
                NIHMS1549223
                10.1038/s41591-020-0762-2
                7101073
                32123386
                3b763d7a-2299-40e9-9336-d81c41c1179c

                Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article