3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The place where only gays go: constructions of queer space in the narratives of sexually diverse refugees

      Journal of Place Management and Development
      Emerald

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The purpose of this paper is to develop an understanding of how gay and lesbian spaces are constructed and deployed within the context of asylum claims by sexually diverse people. Through doing this, the author details the ways in which the present deployment of place, as a form of evidence for a relatively fixed conception of sexual difference, does not correspond to the self-conceptions of sexually diverse asylum seekers.

          Design/methodology/approach

          This article draws on the experiences of eight sexually diverse refugees who agreed to participate in semi-structured interviews. Deploying a queer narrative analysis approach, these experiences are explored to develop a detailed understanding of how sexually diverse spaces are constructed within refugee status determinations. This interview-led approach is combined with a critical epistemology informed by the queer theory to understand the role of place in the construction of sexual identity.

          Findings

          The central finding of this article is that engagement/attendance with/in particular places and spaces is overdetermined as a form of evidence of LGBTIQA+ identity within refugee status determination. Further findings relate to the relationship between places and sexual identities more generally. The paper helps to shed light on how sexually diverse identities are conceived in essentially ontological and fixed terms, with the result that places are often flattened, with the diversity and tensions within them being ignored and occluded.

          Originality/value

          The originality of this study emerges from the analysis of new qualitative data. This originality is strengthened by the successful combination of empirical research, queer theoretical insights and the application of this combination to policy. This remaining a relatively rare combination. In addition, in contrast to the existing literature, the paper looks specifically at how LGBTIQA+ or queer spaces are conceptualised within refugee status determination processes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Mapping US Homonormativities

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            'The Ring of Truth': A Case Study of Credibility Assessment in Particular Social Group Refugee Determinations

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The UK’s hostile environment: Deputising immigration control

              In 2012, Home Secretary Theresa May told a newspaper that she wanted to create a ‘really hostile environment’ for irregular migrants in the UK. Although the phrase has since mutated to refer to generalised state-led marginalisation of immigrants, this article argues that the hostile environment is a specific policy approach, and one with profound significance for the UK’s border practices. We trace the ‘hostile environment’ phrase, exposing its origins in other policy realms, charting its evolution into immigration, identifying the key components and critically reviewing the corresponding legislation. The article analyses the impact and consequences of the hostile environment, appraising the costs to public health and safety, the public purse, individual vulnerability and marginalisation, and wider social relations. We conclude by identifying the fundamental flaws of the policy approach, arguing that they led to the 2018 Windrush scandal and risk creating similar problems for European Economic Area nationals after Brexit.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Place Management and Development
                JPMD
                Emerald
                1753-8335
                1753-8335
                July 17 2023
                May 15 2024
                July 17 2023
                May 15 2024
                : 17
                : 2
                : 171-185
                Article
                10.1108/JPMD-11-2022-0108
                3956ec22-fd53-4d7d-b461-c176e217f70d
                © 2024

                https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article