0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography point-of-care testing to determine antibiotic prescription in patients with lower respiratory tract infection in primary care: pragmatic cluster randomised trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To assess whether point-of care procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography can safely reduce unnecessary antibiotic treatment in patients with lower respiratory tract infections in primary care.

          Design

          Three group, pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial from September 2018 to March 2020.

          Setting

          60 Swiss general practices.

          Participants

          One general practitioner per practice was included. General practitioners screen all patients with acute cough; patients with clinical pneumonia were included.

          Interventions

          Randomisation in a 1:1:1 of general practitioners to either antibiotics guided by sequential procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography point-of-care tests (UltraPro; n=152), procalcitonin guided antibiotics (n=195), or usual care (n=122).

          Main outcomes

          Primary outcome was proportion of patients in each group prescribed an antibiotic by day 28. Secondary outcomes included duration of restricted activities due to lower respiratory tract infection within 14 days.

          Results

          60 general practitioners included 469 patients (median age 53 years (interquartile range 38-66); 278 (59%) were female). Probability of antibiotic prescription at day 28 was lower in the procalcitonin group than in the usual care group (0.40 v 0.70, cluster corrected difference −0.26 (95% confidence interval −0.41 to −0.10)). No significant difference was seen between UltraPro and procalcitonin groups (0.41 v 0.40, −0.03 (−0.17 to 0.12)). The median number of days with restricted activities by day 14 was 4 days in the procalcitonin group and 3 days in the usual care group (difference 1 day (95% confidence interval −0.23 to 2.32); hazard ratio 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.58 to 0.97)), which did not prove non-inferiority.

          Conclusions

          Compared with usual care, point-of-care procalcitonin led to a 26% absolute reduction in the probability of 28 day antibiotic prescription without affecting patients’ safety. Point-of-care lung ultrasonography did not further reduce antibiotic prescription, although a potential added value cannot be excluded, owing to the wide confidence intervals.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03191071.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap) is a novel workflow methodology and software solution designed for rapid development and deployment of electronic data capture tools to support clinical and translational research. We present: (1) a brief description of the REDCap metadata-driven software toolset; (2) detail concerning the capture and use of study-related metadata from scientific research teams; (3) measures of impact for REDCap; (4) details concerning a consortium network of domestic and international institutions collaborating on the project; and (5) strengths and limitations of the REDCap system. REDCap is currently supporting 286 translational research projects in a growing collaborative network including 27 active partner institutions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections - Full version

              This document is an update of Guidelines published in 2005 and now includes scientific publications through to May 2010. It provides evidence-based recommendations for the most common management questions occurring in routine clinical practice in the management of adult patients with LRTI. Topics include management outside hospital, management inside hospital (including community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD), acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis) and prevention. Background sections and graded evidence tables are also included. The target audience for the Guideline is thus all those whose routine practice includes the management of adult LRTI.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: senior registrar
                Role: professor
                Role: professor
                Role: senior statistician
                Role: senior lecturer
                Role: professor
                Role: professor
                Role: senior lecturer
                Journal
                BMJ
                BMJ
                BMJ-UK
                bmj
                The BMJ
                BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
                0959-8138
                1756-1833
                2021
                21 September 2021
                : 374
                : n2132
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Infectious Diseases Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
                [2 ]Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
                [3 ]Medix General Practice, Bern, Switzerland
                [4 ]Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
                [5 ]Department of Education, Research, and Innovation, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
                [6 ]Department of Family Medicine, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
                [7 ]Digital Global Health Department, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
                [8 ]Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: N Boillat-Blanco noemie.boillat@ 123456chuv.ch
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5546-801X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8861-4538
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2490-8174
                Article
                lhol063784
                10.1136/bmj.n2132
                9083102
                34548312
                394ef184-86c4-4029-858e-ef199d64dd7d
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 23 August 2021
                Categories
                Research

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article