13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      From small holes to grand narratives: the impact of taphonomy and sample size on the modernity debate in Australia and New Guinea.

      Journal of human evolution
      Animals, Anthropology, Cultural, methods, Australasia, Data Collection, Environment, Fossils, Hominidae, Humans, Population Density, Sample Size

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Our knowledge of early Australasian societies has significantly expanded in recent decades with more than 220 Pleistocene sites reported from a range of environmental zones and depositional contexts. The uniqueness of this dataset has played an increasingly important role in global debates about the origins and expression of complex behaviour among early modern human populations. Nevertheless, discussions of Pleistocene behaviour and cultural innovation are yet to adequately consider the effects of taphonomy and archaeological sampling on the nature and representativeness of the record. Here, we investigate the effects of preservation and sampling on the archaeological record of Sahul, and explore the implications for understanding early cultural diversity and complexity. We find no evidence to support the view that Pleistocene populations of Sahul lacked cognitive modernity or cultural complexity. Instead, we argue that differences in the nature of early modern human populations across the globe were more likely the consequence of differences in population size and density, interaction and historical contingency. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          21489603
          10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.03.002

          Chemistry
          Animals,Anthropology, Cultural,methods,Australasia,Data Collection,Environment,Fossils,Hominidae,Humans,Population Density,Sample Size

          Comments

          Comment on this article