7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Multidisciplinary Approach to the Transfection of Plasmid DNA by a Nonviral Nanocarrier Based on a Gemini–Bolaamphiphilic Hybrid Lipid

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A multidisciplinary strategy, including both biochemical and biophysical studies, was proposed here to evaluate the potential of lipid nanoaggregates consisting of a mixture of a gemini–bolaamphiphilic lipid (C 6C 22C 6) and the well-known helper lipid 1,2-dioleoyl- sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE) to transfect plasmid DNA into living cells in an efficient and safe way. For that purpose, several experimental techniques were employed, such as zeta potential (phase analysis light scattering methodology), agarose gel electrophoresis (pDNA compaction and pDNA protection assays), small-angle X-ray scattering, cryo-transmission electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, fluorescence-assisted cell sorting, luminometry, and cytotoxicity assays. The results revealed that the cationic lipid and plasmid offer only 70 and 30% of their nominal positive ( ) and negative charges ( ), respectively. Upon mixing with DOPE, they form lipoplexes that self-aggregate in typical multilamellar L α lyotropic liquid-crystal nanostructures with sizes in the range of 100–200 nm and low polydispersities, very suitably fitted to remain in the bloodstream and cross the cell membrane. Interestingly, these nanoaggregates were able to compact, protect (from the degrading effect of DNase I), and transfect two DNA plasmids (pEGFP-C3, encoding the green fluorescent protein, and pCMV-Luc, encoding luciferase) into COS-7 cells, with an efficiency equal or even superior to that of the universal control Lipo2000*, as long as the effective +/– charge ratio was maintained higher than 1 but reasonably close to electroneutrality. Moreover, this transfection process was not cytotoxic because the viability of COS-7 cells remained at high levels, greater than 80%. All of these features make the C 6C 22C 6/DOPE nanosystem an optimal nonviral gene nanocarrier in vitro and a potentially interesting candidate for future in vivo experiments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Nonviral vectors for gene delivery.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Breaking down the barriers: siRNA delivery and endosome escape.

            RNA interference (RNAi)-based technologies offer an attractive strategy for the sequence-specific silencing of disease-causing genes. The application of small interfering (si)RNAs as potential therapeutic agents requires safe and effective methods for their delivery to the cytoplasm of the target cells and tissues. Recent studies have shown significant progress in the development of targeting reagents that facilitate the recognition of and siRNA delivery to specific cell types. However, most of these delivery approaches are not optimized to enable the intracellular trafficking of the siRNAs into the cytoplasm where they must associate with the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) to direct the cleavage of mRNAs bearing complementary binding sites. In particular, the trafficking of siRNAs from endosomes into the cytoplasm represents a major rate-limiting step for many delivery approaches. This Commentary focuses on novel strategies designed to enhance endosomal escape and thereby increase the efficacy of siRNA-mediated gene silencing.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              siRNA vs. shRNA: similarities and differences.

              RNA interference (RNAi) is a natural process through which expression of a targeted gene can be knocked down with high specificity and selectivity. Using available technology and bioinformatics investigators will soon be able to identify relevant bio molecular tumor network hubs as potential key targets for knockdown approaches. Methods of mediating the RNAi effect involve small interfering RNA (siRNA), short hairpin RNA (shRNA) and bi-functional shRNA. The simplicity of siRNA manufacturing and transient nature of the effect per dose are optimally suited for certain medical disorders (i.e. viral injections). However, using the endogenous processing machinery, optimized shRNA constructs allow for high potency and sustainable effects using low copy numbers resulting in less off-target effects, particularly if embedded in a miRNA scaffold. Bi-functional design may further enhance potency and safety of RNAi-based therapeutics. Remaining challenges include tumor selective delivery vehicles and more complete evaluation of the scope and scale of off-target effects. This review will compare siRNA, shRNA and bi-functional shRNA.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ACS Omega
                ACS Omega
                ao
                acsodf
                ACS Omega
                American Chemical Society
                2470-1343
                08 January 2018
                31 January 2018
                : 3
                : 1
                : 208-217
                Affiliations
                []Departamento de Química Física I, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid , 28040 Madrid, Spain
                []Centro Singular de Investigación en Química Biolóxica e Materiais Moleculares (CIQUS) and Departamento de Química Física, Universidade de Santiago , 15782 Santiago, Spain
                [§ ]Departamento de Farmacia, Tecnología Farmacéutica y Fisicoquímica, Facultad de Farmacia y Ciencia de Los Alimentos, Universitat de Barcelona, and Institut de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia IN2UB , Barcelona, Catalonia 08028, Spain
                []Departamento de Farmacia y Tecnología Farmacéutica, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra , 31008 Pamplona, Spain
                Author notes
                [* ]E-mail: junquera@ 123456quim.ucm.es . Phone: +34913944131. Fax: +34913944135 (E.J.).
                Article
                10.1021/acsomega.7b01657
                6044976
                30023772
                3623d427-e467-4e97-b38c-43a0df93a22f
                Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society

                This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.

                History
                : 27 October 2017
                : 26 December 2017
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                ao7b01657
                ao-2017-01657z

                Comments

                Comment on this article