21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Scary and nasty beasts: Self‐reported fear and disgust of common phobic animals

      1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 3
      British Journal of Psychology
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d16301781e115">Animal phobias are one of the most prevalent mental disorders. We analysed how fear and disgust, two emotions involved in their onset and maintenance, are elicited by common phobic animals. In an online survey, the subjects rated 25 animal images according to elicited fear and disgust. Additionally, they completed four psychometrics, the Fear Survey Schedule II (FSS), Disgust Scale - Revised (DS-R), Snake Questionnaire (SNAQ), and Spider Questionnaire (SPQ). Based on a redundancy analysis, fear and disgust image ratings could be described by two axes, one reflecting a general negative perception of animals associated with higher FSS and DS-R scores and the second one describing a specific aversion to snakes and spiders associated with higher SNAQ and SPQ scores. The animals can be separated into five distinct clusters: (1) non-slimy invertebrates; (2) snakes; (3) mice, rats, and bats; (4) human endo- and exoparasites (intestinal helminths and louse); and (5) farm/pet animals. However, only snakes, spiders, and parasites evoke intense fear and disgust in the non-clinical population. In conclusion, rating animal images according to fear and disgust can be an alternative and reliable method to standard scales. Moreover, tendencies to overgeneralize irrational fears onto other harmless species from the same category can be used for quick animal phobia detection. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism.

              Many researchers have claimed that the emotion of disgust functions to protect us from disease. Although there have been several discussions of this hypothesis, none have yet reviewed the evidence in its entirety. The authors derive 14 hypotheses from a disease-avoidance account and evaluate the evidence for each, drawing upon research on pathogen avoidance in animals and empirical research on disgust. In all but 1 case, the evidence favors a disease-avoidance account. It is suggested that disgust is evoked by objects/people that possess particular types of prepared features that connote disease. Such simple disgust are directly disease related, are acquired during childhood, and are able to contaminate other objects/people. The complex disgust, which emerge later in development, may be mediated by several emotions. In these cases, violations of societal norms that may subserve a disease-avoidance function, notably relating to food and sex, act as reminders of simple disgust elicitors and thus generate disgust and motivate compliance. The authors find strong support for a disease-avoidance account and suggest that it offers a way to bridge the divide between concrete and ideational accounts of disgust. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                British Journal of Psychology
                Br J Psychol
                Wiley
                0007-1269
                2044-8295
                June 11 2019
                June 11 2019
                Affiliations
                [1 ]National Institute of Mental Health Klecany Czech Republic
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts Charles University Prague Czech Republic
                [3 ]Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic
                Article
                10.1111/bjop.12409
                31183857
                35f76fc8-8505-499d-9444-79717e5294f6
                © 2019

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article