1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The effects of real-time waveform analysis software on patient ventilator synchronization during pressure support ventilation: a randomized crossover physiological study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patient-ventilator asynchrony commonly occurs during pressure support ventilation (PSV). IntelliSync + software (Hamilton Medical AG, Bonaduz, Switzerland) is a new ventilation technology that continuously analyzes ventilator waveforms to detect the beginning and end of patient inspiration in real time. This study aimed to evaluate the physiological effect of IntelliSync + software on inspiratory trigger delay time, delta airway (P aw) and esophageal (P es) pressure drop during the trigger phase, airway occlusion pressure at 0.1 s (P 0.1), and hemodynamic variables.

          Methods

          A randomized crossover physiologic study was conducted in 14 mechanically ventilated patients under PSV. Patients were randomly assigned to receive conventional flow trigger and cycling, inspiratory trigger synchronization (I-sync), cycle synchronization (C-sync), and inspiratory trigger and cycle synchronization (I/C-sync) for 15 min at each step. Other ventilator settings were kept constant. P aw, P es, airflow, P 0.1, respiratory rate, SpO 2, and hemodynamic variables were recorded. The primary outcome was inspiratory trigger and cycle delay time between each intervention. Secondary outcomes were delta P aw and P es drop during the trigger phase, P 0.1, SpO 2, and hemodynamic variables.

          Results

          The time to initiate the trigger was significantly shorter with I-sync compared to baseline (208.9±91.7 vs. 301.4±131.7 msec; P = 0.002) and I/C-sync compared to baseline (222.8±94.0 vs. 301.4±131.7 msec; P = 0.005). The I/C-sync group had significantly lower delta P aw and P es drop during the trigger phase compared to C-sync group (-0.7±0.4 vs. -1.2±0.8 cmH 2O; P = 0.028 and − 1.8±2.2 vs. -2.8±3.2 cmH 2O; P = 0.011, respectively). No statistically significant differences were found in cycle delay time, P 0.1 and other physiological variables between the groups.

          Conclusions

          IntelliSync + software reduced inspiratory trigger delay time compared to the conventional flow trigger system during PSV mode. However, no significant improvements in cycle delay time and other physiological variables were observed with IntelliSync + software.

          Trial registration

          This study was registered in the Thai Clinical Trial Registry (TCTR20200528003; date of registration 28/05/2020).

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-024-03039-0.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evolution of mortality over time in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

          Baseline characteristics and management have changed over time in patients requiring mechanical ventilation; however, the impact of these changes on patient outcomes is unclear. To estimate whether mortality in mechanically ventilated patients has changed over time. Prospective cohort studies conducted in 1998, 2004, and 2010, including patients receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 12 hours in a 1-month period, from 927 units in 40 countries. To examine effects over time on mortality in intensive care units, we performed generalized estimating equation models. We included 18,302 patients. The reasons for initiating mechanical ventilation varied significantly among cohorts. Ventilatory management changed over time (P < 0.001), with increased use of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (5% in 1998 to 14% in 2010), a decrease in tidal volume (mean 8.8 ml/kg actual body weight [SD = 2.1] in 1998 to 6.9 ml/kg [SD = 1.9] in 2010), and an increase in applied positive end-expiratory pressure (mean 4.2 cm H2O [SD = 3.8] in 1998 to 7.0 cm of H2O [SD = 3.0] in 2010). Crude mortality in the intensive care unit decreased in 2010 compared with 1998 (28 versus 31%; odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.94), despite a similar complication rate. Hospital mortality decreased similarly. After adjusting for baseline and management variables, this difference remained significant (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.92). Patient characteristics and ventilation practices have changed over time, and outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients have improved. Clinical trials registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01093482).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation.

            The incidence, pathophysiology, and consequences of patient-ventilator asynchrony are poorly known. We assessed the incidence of patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation and we identified associated factors. Sixty-two consecutive patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 24 h were included prospectively as soon as they triggered all ventilator breaths: assist-control ventilation (ACV) in 11 and pressure-support ventilation (PSV) in 51. Gross asynchrony detected visually on 30-min recordings of flow and airway pressure was quantified using an asynchrony index. Fifteen patients (24%) had an asynchrony index greater than 10% of respiratory efforts. Ineffective triggering and double-triggering were the two main asynchrony patterns. Asynchrony existed during both ACV and PSV, with a median number of episodes per patient of 72 (range 13-215) vs. 16 (4-47) in 30 min, respectively (p=0.04). Double-triggering was more common during ACV than during PSV, but no difference was found for ineffective triggering. Ineffective triggering was associated with a less sensitive inspiratory trigger, higher level of pressure support (15 cmH(2)O, IQR 12-16, vs. 17.5, IQR 16-20), higher tidal volume, and higher pH. A high incidence of asynchrony was also associated with a longer duration of mechanical ventilation (7.5 days, IQR 3-20, vs. 25.5, IQR 9.5-42.5). One-fourth of patients exhibit a high incidence of asynchrony during assisted ventilation. Such a high incidence is associated with a prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation. Patients with frequent ineffective triggering may receive excessive levels of ventilatory support.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The application of esophageal pressure measurement in patients with respiratory failure.

              This report summarizes current physiological and technical knowledge on esophageal pressure (Pes) measurements in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. The respiratory changes in Pes are representative of changes in pleural pressure. The difference between airway pressure (Paw) and Pes is a valid estimate of transpulmonary pressure. Pes helps determine what fraction of Paw is applied to overcome lung and chest wall elastance. Pes is usually measured via a catheter with an air-filled thin-walled latex balloon inserted nasally or orally. To validate Pes measurement, a dynamic occlusion test measures the ratio of change in Pes to change in Paw during inspiratory efforts against a closed airway. A ratio close to unity indicates that the system provides a valid measurement. Provided transpulmonary pressure is the lung-distending pressure, and that chest wall elastance may vary among individuals, a physiologically based ventilator strategy should take the transpulmonary pressure into account. For monitoring purposes, clinicians rely mostly on Paw and flow waveforms. However, these measurements may mask profound patient-ventilator asynchrony and do not allow respiratory muscle effort assessment. Pes also permits the measurement of transmural vascular pressures during both passive and active breathing. Pes measurements have enhanced our understanding of the pathophysiology of acute lung injury, patient-ventilator interaction, and weaning failure. The use of Pes for positive end-expiratory pressure titration may help improve oxygenation and compliance. Pes measurements make it feasible to individualize the level of muscle effort during mechanical ventilation and weaning. The time is now right to apply the knowledge obtained with Pes to improve the management of critically ill and ventilator-dependent patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nuttapol.rit@mahidol.ac.th
                Journal
                BMC Pulm Med
                BMC Pulm Med
                BMC Pulmonary Medicine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2466
                1 May 2024
                1 May 2024
                2024
                : 24
                : 212
                Affiliations
                Division of Respiratory Diseases and Tuberculosis, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, ( https://ror.org/01znkr924) Bangkok, Thailand
                Article
                3039
                10.1186/s12890-024-03039-0
                11064376
                38693506
                35aec863-1ba7-436e-aa67-a84a8d8b2ce7
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 22 November 2023
                : 26 April 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: Mahidol University
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Respiratory medicine
                asynchrony,esophageal pressure,pressure support ventilation,patient-ventilator interaction

                Comments

                Comment on this article