20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Optical flow models as an open benchmark for radar-based precipitation nowcasting (rainymotion v0.1)

      , ,
      Geoscientific Model Development Discussions
      Copernicus GmbH

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Quantitative precipitation nowcasting (QPN) has become an essential technique in various application contexts, such as early warning or urban sewage control. A common heuristic prediction approach is to track the motion of precipitation features from a sequence of weather radar images, and then to extrapolate that motion to the imminent future (minutes to hours), assuming that the intensity of the features remains constant (<q>Lagrangian persistence</q>). In that context, <q>optical flow</q> has become one of the most popular tracking techniques. Yet, the present landscape of computational QPN models still struggles with producing open software implementations. Focusing on this gap, we have developed and extensively benchmarked a stack of models based on different optical flow algorithms for the tracking step, and a set of parsimonious extrapolation procedures based on image warping and advection. We demonstrate that these models provide skillful predictions comparable with or even superior to state-of-the-art operational software. Our software library (<q>rainymotion</q>) for precipitation nowcasting is written in Python programming language, and openly available at GitHub (<a href="https://github.com/hydrogo/rainymotion"target="_blank">https://github.com/hydrogo/rainymotion</a>). That way, the library may serve as a tool for providing fast, free and transparent solutions that could serve as a benchmark for further model development and hypothesis testing &amp;ndash; a benchmark that is far more advanced than the conventional benchmark of Eulerian persistence commonly used in QPN verification experiments.</p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Geoscientific Model Development Discussions
          Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss.
          Copernicus GmbH
          1991-962X
          September 10 2018
          : 1-23
          Article
          10.5194/gmd-2018-166
          35607f53-e2ae-400d-aff9-0ef460774b12
          © 2018

          https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article