8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Reappraisal mitigates overestimation of remembered pain in anxious individuals

      ,
      Cognition and Emotion
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Anxiety sensitivity, a trait characterised by fear of anxiety-related body sensations, has been linked to heightened attention to pain, appraising body sensations as threatening, and remembering threat-related information. We assessed whether individuals with greater anxiety sensitivity overestimate in remembering pain. We also assessed whether emotion regulation strategies that direct attention away from pain (distraction), or alter appraisals of pain (reappraisal), alleviate memory bias. Participants (N = 137) were randomly assigned to one of two emotion regulation conditions or to a control condition before taking part in a cold pressor task. Greater anxiety sensitivity was associated with overestimation in remembering pain. Engaging in reappraisal mitigated this memory bias but engaging in distraction did not. This is the first study to examine the relations among anxiety sensitivity, emotion regulation and memory for pain. The findings suggest that health-care practitioners can encourage reappraisal to promote more positive memories of procedural pain, particularly in patients high in anxiety sensitivity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          WHEN MORE PAIN IS PREFERRED TO LESS:. Adding a Better End

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patients' memories of painful medical treatments: real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures.

            Patients' memories of painful medical procedures may influence their decisions about future treatments, yet memories are imperfect and susceptible to bias. We recorded in real-time the intensity of pain experienced by patients undergoing colonoscopy (n = 154) and lithotripsy (n = 133). We subsequently examined patients' retrospective evaluations of the total pain of the procedure, and related these evaluations to the real-time recording obtained during the experience. We found that individuals varied substantially in the total amount of pain they remembered. Patients' judgments of total pain were strongly correlated with the peak intensity of pain (P < 0.005) and with the intensity of pain recorded during the last 3 min of the procedure (P < 0.005). Despite substantial variation in the duration of the experience, lengthy procedures were not remembered as particularly aversive. We suggest that patients' memories of painful medical procedures largely reflect the intensity of pain at the worst part and at the final part of the experience.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: Evidence for two judgment processes.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cognition and Emotion
                Cognition and Emotion
                Informa UK Limited
                0269-9931
                1464-0600
                July 20 2015
                August 17 2016
                July 20 2015
                August 17 2016
                : 30
                : 6
                : 1222-1231
                Article
                10.1080/02699931.2015.1049937
                26192160
                355687c8-1d34-4f80-a4eb-24a7f1d60492
                © 2016
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article