91
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources.

      BMJ : British Medical Journal
      Data Collection, methods, standards, Information Storage and Retrieval, Review Literature as Topic

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To describe where papers come from in a systematic review of complex evidence. Method Audit of how the 495 primary sources for the review were originally identified. Only 30% of sources were obtained from the protocol defined at the outset of the study (that is, from the database and hand searches). Fifty one per cent were identified by "snowballing" (such as pursuing references of references), and 24% by personal knowledge or personal contacts. Systematic reviews of complex evidence cannot rely solely on protocol-driven search strategies.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          16230312
          1283190
          10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68

          Chemistry
          Data Collection,methods,standards,Information Storage and Retrieval,Review Literature as Topic

          Comments

          Comment on this article