3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Implementation of the Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety Program to Improve Infection Prevention and Control Practices in Four Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Pune, India

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective: To implement the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP) in four neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Pune, India, to improve infection prevention and control (IPC) practices.

          Design: In this quasi-experimental study, we implemented CUSP in four NICUs in Pune, India, to improve IPC practices in three focus areas: hand hygiene, aseptic technique for invasive procedures, and medication and intravenous fluid preparation and administration. Sites received training in CUSP methodology, formed multidisciplinary teams, and selected interventions for each focus area. Process measures included fidelity to CUSP, hand hygiene compliance, and central line insertion checklist completion. Outcome measures included the rate of healthcare-associated bloodstream infection (HA-BSI), all-cause mortality, patient safety culture, and workload.

          Results: A total of 144 healthcare workers and administrators completed CUSP training. All sites conducted at least 75% of monthly meetings. Hand hygiene compliance odds increased 6% per month [odds ratio (OR) 1.06 (95% CI 1.03–1.10)]. Providers completed insertion checklists for 68% of neonates with a central line; 83% of checklists were fully completed. All-cause mortality and HA-BSI rate did not change significantly after CUSP implementation. Patient safety culture domains with greatest improvement were management support for patient safety (+7.6%), teamwork within units (+5.3%), and organizational learning—continuous improvement (+4.7%). Overall workload increased from a mean score of 46.28 ± 16.97 at baseline to 65.07 ± 19.05 at follow-up ( p < 0.0001).

          Conclusion: CUSP implementation increased hand hygiene compliance, successful implementation of a central line insertion checklist, and improvements in safety culture in four Indian NICUs. This multimodal strategy is a promising framework for low- and middle-income country healthcare facilities to reduce HAI risk in neonates.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process

          Since the publication of Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this manuscript, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) semistructured interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) two face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasises the reporting of three key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value and safety of healthcare: the use of formal and informal theory in planning, implementing and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve healthcare, recognising that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (http://www.squire-statement.org).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Access to effective antimicrobials: a worldwide challenge.

            Recent years have seen substantial improvements in life expectancy and access to antimicrobials, especially in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, but increasing pathogen resistance to antimicrobials threatens to roll back this progress. Resistant organisms in health-care and community settings pose a threat to survival rates from serious infections, including neonatal sepsis and health-care-associated infections, and limit the potential health benefits from surgeries, transplants, and cancer treatment. The challenge of simultaneously expanding appropriate access to antimicrobials, while restricting inappropriate access, particularly to expensive, newer generation antimicrobials, is unique in global health and requires new approaches to financing and delivering health care and a one-health perspective on the connections between pathogen transmission in animals and humans. Here, we describe the importance of effective antimicrobials. We assess the disease burden caused by limited access to antimicrobials, attributable to resistance to antimicrobials, and the potential effect of vaccines in restricting the need for antibiotics.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU.

              Catheter-related bloodstream infections occurring in the intensive care unit (ICU) are common, costly, and potentially lethal. We conducted a collaborative cohort study predominantly in ICUs in Michigan. An evidence-based intervention was used to reduce the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections. Multilevel Poisson regression modeling was used to compare infection rates before, during, and up to 18 months after implementation of the study intervention. Rates of infection per 1000 catheter-days were measured at 3-month intervals, according to the guidelines of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. A total of 108 ICUs agreed to participate in the study, and 103 reported data. The analysis included 1981 ICU-months of data and 375,757 catheter-days. The median rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection per 1000 catheter-days decreased from 2.7 infections at baseline to 0 at 3 months after implementation of the study intervention (P< or =0.002), and the mean rate per 1000 catheter-days decreased from 7.7 at baseline to 1.4 at 16 to 18 months of follow-up (P<0.002). The regression model showed a significant decrease in infection rates from baseline, with incidence-rate ratios continuously decreasing from 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.81) at 0 to 3 months after implementation of the intervention to 0.34 (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.50) at 16 to 18 months. An evidence-based intervention resulted in a large and sustained reduction (up to 66%) in rates of catheter-related bloodstream infection that was maintained throughout the 18-month study period. Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pediatr
                Front Pediatr
                Front. Pediatr.
                Frontiers in Pediatrics
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2360
                06 January 2022
                2021
                : 9
                : 794637
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD, United States
                [2] 2Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD, United States
                [3] 3Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD, United States
                [4] 4Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins Medicine , Baltimore, MD, United States
                [5] 5Byramjee-Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College-Johns Hopkins University Clinical Research Site , Pune, India
                [6] 6Department of Pediatrics, Byramjee-Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College , Pune, India
                [7] 7Department of Neonatology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to Be University Medical College , Pune, India
                [8] 8Department of Pediatrics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to Be University Medical College , Pune, India
                [9] 9Department of Pediatrics, King Edward Memorial Hospital , Pune, India
                [10] 10Department of Pediatrics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College , Pune, India
                [11] 11Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control, Johns Hopkins Hospital , Baltimore, MD, United States
                [12] 12Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA, United States
                [13] 13Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, GA, United States
                [14] 14Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, MD, United States
                [15] 15Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD, United States
                [16] 16Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Shi Yuan, Children‘s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China

                Reviewed by: Tuuli Metsvaht, University of Tartu, Estonia; Shan He, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, China

                *Correspondence: Julia Johnson jjohn245@ 123456jhmi.edu

                This article was submitted to Neonatology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics

                Article
                10.3389/fped.2021.794637
                8772032
                35071137
                34314dc5-3916-4c2d-b7f8-db88f9b1fb3d
                Copyright © 2022 Johnson, Latif, Randive, Kadam, Rajput, Kinikar, Malshe, Lalwani, Parikh, Vaidya, Malwade, Agarkhedkar, Curless, Coffin, Smith, Westercamp, Colantuoni, Robinson, Mave, Gupta, Manabe and Milstone.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 13 October 2021
                : 13 December 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 38, Pages: 14, Words: 9157
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health, doi 10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: 1R01AI43748-01A1
                Award ID: K23HD100594
                Award ID: K24AI141580
                Award ID: UM1AI068632
                Award ID: UM1AI068636
                Award ID: UM1AI069465
                Award ID: UM1AI069465-13
                Award ID: UM1AI104681
                Funded by: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, doi 10.13039/100000030;
                Categories
                Pediatrics
                Original Research

                neonate,healthcare-associated infection,patient safety,hand hygiene,aseptic technique,patient safety culture,multimodal strategy,bloodstream infection

                Comments

                Comment on this article