17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How to Manage COVID-19 Vaccination in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: An Expert Opinion by IMIDs Study Group

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 1 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 7 , 18 , 19 , 11 , 20 , 21 , 11 , 12 , 11 , 19 , 16 , 6 , 15 , 1
      Frontiers in Immunology
      Frontiers Media S.A.
      COVID-19, Sars-CoV-2, vaccine, IMIDs, chronic disease, prevention

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Since March 2020, the outbreak of Sars-CoV-2 pandemic has changed medical practice and daily routine around the world. Huge efforts from pharmacological industries have led to the development of COVID-19 vaccines. In particular two mRNA vaccines, namely the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and a viral-vectored vaccine, i.e. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca), have recently been approved in Europe. Clinical trials on these vaccines have been published on the general population showing a high efficacy with minor adverse events. However, specific data about the efficacy and safety of these vaccines in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) are still lacking. Moreover, the limited availability of these vaccines requires prioritizing some vulnerable categories of patients compared to others. In this position paper, we propose the point of view about the management of COVID-19 vaccination from Italian experts on IMIDs and the identification of high-risk groups according to the different diseases and their chronic therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references118

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

          Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have afflicted tens of millions of people in a worldwide pandemic. Safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. Methods In an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned persons 16 years of age or older in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses, 21 days apart, of either placebo or the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate (30 μg per dose). BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine that encodes a prefusion stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein. The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety. Results A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo; BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). Similar vaccine efficacy (generally 90 to 100%) was observed across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, ethnicity, baseline body-mass index, and the presence of coexisting conditions. Among 10 cases of severe Covid-19 with onset after the first dose, 9 occurred in placebo recipients and 1 in a BNT162b2 recipient. The safety profile of BNT162b2 was characterized by short-term, mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups. Conclusions A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine

            Abstract Background Vaccines are needed to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) and to protect persons who are at high risk for complications. The mRNA-1273 vaccine is a lipid nanoparticle–encapsulated mRNA-based vaccine that encodes the prefusion stabilized full-length spike protein of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes Covid-19. Methods This phase 3 randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 99 centers across the United States. Persons at high risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection or its complications were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two intramuscular injections of mRNA-1273 (100 μg) or placebo 28 days apart. The primary end point was prevention of Covid-19 illness with onset at least 14 days after the second injection in participants who had not previously been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Results The trial enrolled 30,420 volunteers who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either vaccine or placebo (15,210 participants in each group). More than 96% of participants received both injections, and 2.2% had evidence (serologic, virologic, or both) of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline. Symptomatic Covid-19 illness was confirmed in 185 participants in the placebo group (56.5 per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 48.7 to 65.3) and in 11 participants in the mRNA-1273 group (3.3 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.7 to 6.0); vaccine efficacy was 94.1% (95% CI, 89.3 to 96.8%; P<0.001). Efficacy was similar across key secondary analyses, including assessment 14 days after the first dose, analyses that included participants who had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline, and analyses in participants 65 years of age or older. Severe Covid-19 occurred in 30 participants, with one fatality; all 30 were in the placebo group. Moderate, transient reactogenicity after vaccination occurred more frequently in the mRNA-1273 group. Serious adverse events were rare, and the incidence was similar in the two groups. Conclusions The mRNA-1273 vaccine showed 94.1% efficacy at preventing Covid-19 illness, including severe disease. Aside from transient local and systemic reactions, no safety concerns were identified. (Funded by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; COVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04470427.)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              OpenSAFELY: factors associated with COVID-19 death in 17 million patients

              COVID-19 has rapidly impacted on mortality worldwide. 1 There is unprecedented urgency to understand who is most at risk of severe outcomes, requiring new approaches for timely analysis of large datasets. Working on behalf of NHS England we created OpenSAFELY: a secure health analytics platform covering 40% of all patients in England, holding patient data within the existing data centre of a major primary care electronic health records vendor. Primary care records of 17,278,392 adults were pseudonymously linked to 10,926 COVID-19 related deaths. COVID-19 related death was associated with: being male (hazard ratio 1.59, 95%CI 1.53-1.65); older age and deprivation (both with a strong gradient); diabetes; severe asthma; and various other medical conditions. Compared to people with white ethnicity, black and South Asian people were at higher risk even after adjustment for other factors (HR 1.48, 1.29-1.69 and 1.45, 1.32-1.58 respectively). We have quantified a range of clinical risk factors for COVID-19 related death in the largest cohort study conducted by any country to date. OpenSAFELY is rapidly adding further patients’ records; we will update and extend results regularly.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                15 April 2021
                2021
                15 April 2021
                : 12
                : 656362
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC) L. Sacco, Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan, Italy
                [2] 2 Rheumatology Unit, S. Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Azienda USL-Toscana Centro , Florence, Italy
                [3] 3 Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC) L. Sacco, Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan, Italy
                [4] 4 Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea , Lecco, Italy
                [5] 5 Surgery Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC) L. Sacco, Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan, Italy
                [6] 6 Pediatric Department, Ospedale dei Bambini, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC) L. Sacco, Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan, Italy
                [7] 7 Division of Endocrinology, ASST Fatebenefratelli - Sacco , Milan, Italy
                [8] 8 International Center for T1D, Pediatric Clinical Research Center Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi, DIBIC, Università Degli Studi di Milano , Milan, Italy
                [9] 9 Nephrology Division, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, United States
                [10] 10 Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC) L. Sacco, Università degli Studi di Milano, III Infectious Diseases unit, University Hospital “Luigi Sacco” , Milan, Italy
                [11] 11 Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC) L. Sacco, Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan, Italy
                [12] 12 Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, “L. Sacco” Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco , Milano, Italy
                [13] 13 Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan, Italy
                [14] 14 Dermatology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan, Italy
                [15] 15 Rheumatology Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC) L. Sacco, Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan, Italy
                [16] 16 Eye Clinic, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Luigi Sacco, Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan, Italy
                [17] 17 The University of Sydney, Save Sight Institute, Discipline of Ophthalmology, Sydney Medical School , Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [18] 18 Pathology Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC) L. Sacco, Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan, Italy
                [19] 19 Division of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale L. Sacco, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco , Milan, Italy
                [20] 20 Department of Infectious Diseases, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan, Italy
                [21] 21 School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg, South Africa
                Author notes

                Edited by: Angelo A. Manfredi, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Italy

                Reviewed by: Roberto Caricchio, Temple University, United States; Christof Specker, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Germany

                *Correspondence: Francesca Ferretti, francesca.ferretti01@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first and senior authorship

                ‡These authors have contributed equally to this work and share last authorship

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2021.656362
                8082137
                33936084
                341786d4-36c6-426e-b588-0c435a1a59ae
                Copyright © 2021 Ferretti, Cannatelli, Benucci, Carmagnola, Clementi, Danelli, Dilillo, Fiorina, Galli, Gallieni, Genovese, Giorgi, Invernizzi, Maconi, Maier, Marzano, Morpurgo, Nebuloni, Radovanovic, Riva, Rizzardini, Sabiu, Santus, Staurenghi, Zuccotti, Sarzi-Puttini and Ardizzone

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 20 January 2021
                : 25 March 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 131, Pages: 14, Words: 7003
                Categories
                Immunology
                Hypothesis and Theory

                Immunology
                covid-19,sars-cov-2,vaccine,imids,chronic disease,prevention
                Immunology
                covid-19, sars-cov-2, vaccine, imids, chronic disease, prevention

                Comments

                Comment on this article