17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Iconicity in Word Learning and Beyond: A Critical Review

      research-article
      ,
      Language and Speech
      SAGE Publications
      Iconicity, learning, communication, comprehension, bootstrapping

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Interest in iconicity (the resemblance-based mapping between aspects of form and meaning ) is in the midst of a resurgence, and a prominent focus in the field has been the possible role of iconicity in language learning. Here we critically review theory and empirical findings in this domain. We distinguish local learning enhancement (where the iconicity of certain lexical items influences the learning of those items) and general learning enhancement (where the iconicity of certain lexical items influences the later learning of non-iconic items or systems). We find that evidence for local learning enhancement is quite strong, though not as clear cut as it is often described and based on a limited sample of languages. Despite common claims about broader facilitatory effects of iconicity on learning, we find that current evidence for general learning enhancement is lacking. We suggest a number of productive avenues for future research and specify what types of evidence would be required to show a role for iconicity in general learning enhancement. We also review evidence for functions of iconicity beyond word learning: iconicity enhances comprehension by providing complementary representations, supports communication about sensory imagery, and expresses affective meanings. Even if learning benefits may be modest or cross-linguistically varied, on balance, iconicity emerges as a vital aspect of language.

          Related collections

          Most cited references133

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review.

          In many everyday situations, our senses are bombarded by many different unisensory signals at any given time. To gain the most veridical, and least variable, estimate of environmental stimuli/properties, we need to combine the individual noisy unisensory perceptual estimates that refer to the same object, while keeping those estimates belonging to different objects or events separate. How, though, does the brain "know" which stimuli to combine? Traditionally, researchers interested in the crossmodal binding problem have focused on the roles that spatial and temporal factors play in modulating multisensory integration. However, crossmodal correspondences between various unisensory features (such as between auditory pitch and visual size) may provide yet another important means of constraining the crossmodal binding problem. A large body of research now shows that people exhibit consistent crossmodal correspondences between many stimulus features in different sensory modalities. For example, people consistently match high-pitched sounds with small, bright objects that are located high up in space. The literature reviewed here supports the view that crossmodal correspondences need to be considered alongside semantic and spatiotemporal congruency, among the key constraints that help our brains solve the crossmodal binding problem.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas.

              Information about the affective meanings of words is used by researchers working on emotions and moods, word recognition and memory, and text-based sentiment analysis. Three components of emotions are traditionally distinguished: valence (the pleasantness of a stimulus), arousal (the intensity of emotion provoked by a stimulus), and dominance (the degree of control exerted by a stimulus). Thus far, nearly all research has been based on the ANEW norms collected by Bradley and Lang (1999) for 1,034 words. We extended that database to nearly 14,000 English lemmas, providing researchers with a much richer source of information, including gender, age, and educational differences in emotion norms. As an example of the new possibilities, we included stimuli from nearly all of the category norms (e.g., types of diseases, occupations, and taboo words) collected by Van Overschelde, Rawson, and Dunlosky (Journal of Memory and Language 50:289-335, 2004), making it possible to include affect in studies of semantic memory.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lang Speech
                Lang Speech
                LAS
                splas
                Language and Speech
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                0023-8309
                1756-6053
                20 April 2020
                March 2021
                : 64
                : 1
                : 52-72
                Affiliations
                [1-0023830920914339]Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Netherlands
                [2-0023830920914339]Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*]Mark Dingemanse, Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Houtlaan 4, Nijmegen, 6500 HD, Netherlands. Email: m.dingemanse@ 123456let.ru.nl
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3290-5723
                Article
                10.1177_0023830920914339
                10.1177/0023830920914339
                7961653
                32308121
                32b8ed11-00bc-4f47-8461-9e53f479550c
                © The Author(s) 2020

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100003246;
                Award ID: 016.vidi.185.205
                Funded by: Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100003246;
                Award ID: 016.154.087
                Funded by: Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science, ;
                Categories
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                iconicity,learning,communication,comprehension,bootstrapping

                Comments

                Comment on this article